What Happens to the Federal Courts in a Government Shutdown?


Click here for all our coverage of the government shutdown.

With extremist Republicans in Congress insisting on shutting down the federal government over the contraception benefit in the Affordable Care Act, it’s looking increasingly likely the federal judiciary will be dragged into the crisis as well.

In an attempt to help prepare members of the judiciary for what could be coming, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts circulated a memo to its members warning a shutdown would result in widespread court furloughs and would worsen the “grave judicial crisis” that exists thanks to the $350 million Congress already stripped from the judiciary’s budget this year. According to the memo, the federal courts have enough reserve funds to run for about ten business days before shutting down all but their most essential functions. The effects of the shutdown would vary among judicial districts, the memo explained, since districts make their own independent budget decisions based on local considerations, such as distribution of case loads and labor needs. That gives each court some leeway in defining essential work, which is broadly defined to include all “activities necessary to support the exercise of the Article III judicial power and emergency activities necessary for the safety of human life and the protection of property.”

Meanwhile, the U.S. Supreme Court announced it will continue to operate through the end of this week, but offered no detail on what will happen to the Court beginning October 5. “In the event of a lapse of appropriations, the Court will continue to conduct its normal operations through October 4,” the Court says on its website. “The Court building will be open to the public during its usual hours. Further notice will be provided in the event a lapse of appropriations continues beyond October 4.”

The Supreme Court’s term is set to begin on Monday, October 7, with oral arguments scheduled for Tuesday, October 8, in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, a case that challenges individual limits to campaign contributions and is considered by many to be one of the most significant cases on the Court’s already high-profile docket. According to reports, there are no plans as of yet to delay the start of the Supreme Court’s term.

Even if Congress comes to some kind of funding resolution, it will do nothing to fix the ongoing funding crisis of the federal courts. And with judicial nominations languishing, case load burdens have reached catastrophic levels in some jurisdictions. Things are so bad, even Chief Justice John Roberts has pleaded with Congress to end the political game-playing with the federal court. But those requests continue to be ignored, which means at best our federal courts come out of this latest political stunt as hobbled as ever.

There was a good argument to be made before the shutdown threat that conservatives had unintentionally created a constitutional crisis by failing to confirm President Obama’s judicial nominees in a timely fashion and by decimating the federal courts’ budget. Now, there’s a good argument to be made that conservatives are intentionally creating one.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Follow Jessica Mason Pieklo on Twitter: @hegemommy

To schedule an interview with Jessica Mason Pieklo please contact Communications Director Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • expect_resistance

    Nope, I’m pretty much blaming the GOP.

    A good read about the root of the shutdown from “Think Progress”
    “The effort to block business as usual began back in 2010, when Republicans started using the country’s debt limit as a bargaining chip to try to get spending reductions. That same year, without bipartisan consensus on a budget, Congress had to pass something called a “continuing resolution” that funds the government for a short period of time at existing levels, but doesn’t manage long-term budgetary concerns, or create a real spending strategy. Continuing resolutions, rather than real budgets, have been passed ever since. In 2011, Republicans once again tried to hold the debt limit hostage, saying they would not approve an increase in the nation’s borrowing power unless the government first passed spending cuts. Lawmakers cut a deal which eventually triggered sequestration — across-the-board cuts on all federal programs — and closed head start programs for kids and cut back other vital services.

    On Monday, just hours before a shutdown, the GOP refused to pass a 6-week continuing resolution that did not roll back the Affordable Care Act — a law they voted to repeal 43 times.”

  • HeilMary1

    Because the Dems won’t throw women and children under the GOP bus. Would you like to volunteer yourself as GOP roadkill?