It’s time to put the old weapons away and start investing in the upcoming generation of pro-choice, reproductive justice leaders.
![[img src]](http://rhrealitycheck.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/../../files/teaser-images/2012-02-27-rinker2-187x125.jpeg)
It looks like the South Dakota legislature has built upon its last unconstitutional, litigated piece of anti-choice legislation and in its infinite wisdom passed an even more egregious piece of anti-choice legislation.
![[img src]](http://rhrealitycheck.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/../../files/teaser-images/2012-01-17-marty2-187x125.jpeg)
Crisis pregnancy centers say they’re all about helping women and children, but their legal justification says otherwise.
![[img src]](http://rhrealitycheck.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/../../files/teaser-images/2011-12-19-marty2-187x125.jpg)
The state already has numerous abortion restrictions being defending in court. Will next year’s legislative session add even more?
![[img src]](http://rhrealitycheck.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/../../files/teaser-images/2011-12-13-marty2-187x125.jpg)
The governor has requested an additional $1 million be added to the legal budget.
_0-187x125.jpg)
As if they don’t have enough restrictions in the court, the state wants to retry one that was already settled.
-187x125.jpg)
The legislative fund meant to pay for the state to defend anti-choice laws just got a $25,000 donation.
-187x125.jpg)
Today the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals threw out important provisions of a South Dakota law that literally forced doctors to lie to their patients.
A local Republican legislator uses her public office to raise money for the state to defend its unconstitutional “informed consent” law.
The state attorney general has decided not to appeal the injunction while the case is waiting to be heard in court.
