The Susan B. Anthony List wants to be able to run ads claiming the ACA supports taxpayer funding for abortion, and today the Roberts Court took them one step closer to being able to do so.
A conservative legal advocacy organization has asked the Roberts Court to review a federal appeals court decision reinstating portions of New York City’s truth-in-advertising law regulating crisis pregnancy centers.
The Supreme Court’s historic Griswold v. Connecticut decision may have legalized contraception use between married couples, but with the Hobby Lobby case, the Roberts Court is poised to take us one giant step backward.
In a recent ruling by the Supreme Court, which paved the way for similar state-level legislation, five justices voted in favor of weakening the separation of church and state; but the implications of Justice Anthony Kennedy’s libertarian jurisprudence are the most dangerous and far-reaching.
The deeply divided court held that even prayers that seem to favor one faith over others can be constitutional.
The high court denied a request to review the suspension of the former Kansas attorney general’s law license.
There’s a good chance the Roberts Court will make it easier for anti-choice advocates to influence elections by misleading the public.
What does “choice” mean in an age of targeted restrictions on abortion providers?
If the petition is granted, the Supreme Court could dramatically limit how abortion restrictions are challenged.
Ultimately, it may not be the conservative justices’ animosity toward reproductive rights and women’s health care generally that sinks the birth control benefit, but rather the Obama administration’s refusal to vigorously defend it.