A Denver TV station attempts to dissect truth in advertising from the opposition group to Colorado’s proposed Personhood Amendment but makes the point, unknowingly, that the initiative’s impacts are so vague as to put voters on the spot.
Self-described “pro-life” Catholic Gov. Bill Ritter has announced his opposition a Colorado ballot initiative that would define fertilized eggs as legal persons. Coloradans will vote on the amendment this November.
An anti-abortion protester attempted to shout down Gov. Bill Ritter, who was speaking on the steps of the Capitol in opposition to the proposed state constitutional amendment that would confer legal rights on fertilized eggs.
Voters in Colorado, South Dakota and California will have the opportunity to restrict or protect women’s reproductive rights this November. What effect would each of these initiatives have, and who’s behind them?