Another appellate court weighs in on the birth control benefit, and in doing so makes clearer the issues the Supreme Court will be asked to resolve. But a powerful dissenting opinion underscores the real issues.
The federal government may be moving forward with the birth control benefit, but the real action in reproductive rights remains in the states.
I would argue that the new proposed rules don’t change anything for women. At all. They don’t restrict contraception access, nor do they take away contraception access previously available.
The anniversary of Roe v. Wade is a reminder that the battle for women’s rights is far from over.
Another ruling in the more than forty legal challenges to the contraception mandate in Obamacare shows the fight is far from over.
Yet another federal court seems sympathetic to the argument that corporations have religious exercise rights.
Billionaire Thomas Monaghan doesn’t need to provide employees insurance that covers contraception, a federal court ruled Sunday.