In today’s New York Times, William Saletan offers a misguided prescription for ending the “culture” wars and perpetuates the myths of “moral” versus “practical.”
This year candidates who formerly fell victim to a caricature of being “pro-abortion” are returning fire. Some have turned the tables by exposing their opponents as not only anti-abortion, but, more radically, anti-contraception.
The presidential candidates have been challenged with the same question again and again: In our unprecedented economic crisis, what programs or services will you cut? If they cut family planning services, other reproductive health costs are sure to spiral leaving “Jane the plumber” without the critical health services she needs.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has a filed a comment objecting to HHS’s new provider conscience regulations.
The 2004 abortion rate in the United States is the lowest it has been since national legalization, but the overall rate masks stark disparities in the abortion rate among different racial and ethnic groups.
There are only 13 days left to comment on the HHS regulations that allow physician’s to opt out of providing services like contraception and family planning to which they object – even if it’s in the best interest of the patient.
A continuing education program for nurses in California indoctrinates providers with anti-contraception ideology — part of the larger project to stock health care professions with anti-choicers who hide behind religion to refuse health care.
An administration that has done everything in its power to oppose abortion is now going after the very thing that can best prevent unintended pregnancies.
According to new HHS regulations, you can have an “abortion” without even being pregnant.
At the International AIDS Conference, a broad global consensus supports the integration of reproductive health services in HIV prevention, while the U.S. government remains reluctant to acknowledge these crucial linkages.