Rachel Maddow discusses the resurfacing argument that rape victims cannot get pregnant– one that is easily and frequently disproved– as being a reasoning device for politicians who wish to completely outlaw abortion without feeling immoral.
A woman with a pregnancy as the result of rape is facing one of the most difficult and confusing situations imaginable. Indeed, the larger problem remains, which is that Rep. Akin and his conservative allies in Congress and state legislatures stand by their desire to limit the health care options a pregnant woman has available to her.
Is the right about to have its first major splintering?
Rachel traces the most recent history of Republican politicians making arguments about the legitimacy of rape victims’ rights and shows that extreme positions are no longer contained in the party’s fringe.
If you are curious who is worried about their reelections, watch who is publicly denouncing the Missouri congressman’s “legitimate rape” remarks.
Calls are mounting for Missouri Representative Todd Akin to resign. But is it really best for women’s rights if he does so?
So, does a pregnancy as a result from sexual assault mean somehow she wanted it?
Missouri Tea Party Senate Candidate doesn’t think abortion in cases of rape is really necessary. Why? Because in cases of “legitimate rape” women’s bodies know how to prevent a pregnancy from happening in the first place.
Missouri Tea Party Senate Candidate Todd Akin doesn’t think abortion after rape is necessary because in cases of “legitimate rape” women’s bodies can prevent a pregnancy.
There’s nothing worse than a bunch of freeloading hungry elementary school kids, right?