Women’s private and public spheres converged in the bathroom of a bar in Mankato, MN with the recent installation of a pregnancy test vending machine.
Trevor MacDonald, a trans father in Canada who has breastfed his son for over a year, was rejected by La Leche League as a volunteer leader because of his gender identity.
Recent conversations have focused on the question of whether home birth is safe. Here is why it’s the wrong question to be asking.
The Indiana woman accused of killing her fetus by ingesting rat poison has rejected the state’s offer to let her plea down to feticide from murder.
Although the veto of the so-called “partial birth abortion” ban was over-turned, the Governor’s veto of H.B. 217 was not.
Myths about the Asian American community — commonly referred to as the “model minority” — often contribute to challenges in uncovering the very real health disparities that exist within the diverse populations that fall under the same statistical umbrella.
While more and more trans people are considering pregnancy and birth, very few providers in that field are equipped to provide adequate care.
From a tragic case in Massachusetts has emerged a rule affirming women’s fundamental personhood: “All births, regardless of venue, carry inherent risks; in the ordinary course, competent women who are pregnant may weigh these risks themselves and make decisions about the course of their own pregnancies and childbirths.”
We in North Carolina are enduring yet another vicious attack on the rights of pregnant and childbearing individuals. Women seeking home births may have the legal right to do so, but just like the women seeking abortion care, these laws do nothing to protect access.
Race-based maternal health disparities are no longer a concern of the minority — they are a concern of the majority. And they should be a top priority. If Medicaid doesn’t make room for alternative, potentially life saving maternal health models, we risk endangering the health of generations to come.