• fiona64

    Another proposed law that makes diploid cells into persons while denying the humanity of the pregnant woman. There is something seriously wrong with the anti-choice.

  • vulgarism

    The folks at Personhood USA are morons. Drew Hymer of P.USA told me that a chimera is created when one person cannibalizes another. Yep. That stupid

    • Shan

      A what? WTF is that, even?

      • vulgarism

        Simple. If I eat you, half my body is suddenly composed of your DNA!

        • Shan

          Awesome! I ate shark once. I can hardly wait for my second row of teeth to come through!

          • vulgarism

            He is now denying that he even mentioned chimeras, has accused me of lying, and has now banned me from personhood USA

            So funny. What a tiny penis he has.

          • fiona64

            And boy, does he continue to embarrass himself.

        • BelligerentBruncher

          That would be a cool superpower.

      • vulgarism

        http://blog.secularprolife.org/2014/07/planned-parenthood-abortion-quotas.html#comment-1499942696

        He is complaining now that I made him look stupid, when he clearly said that chimerism = form of cannibalism

        • Shan

          Ack, I’m not going there! That’s one of THE most non-user friendly forums out there. Plus, ugh.

          • vulgarism

            You don’t need to. That is just proof of his lies.

  • StealthGaytheist

    Cell clusters and corporations are people. Women are not. Even Orwell couldn’t have predicted this sort of lunacy.

  • L-dan

    They keep saying this protects fetuses. how? In the case of Brady there, the drunk driver would have happened regardless of this law. It just means the driver can be charged with murder instead of (or in addition to) the other crimes that are already on the books. From an emotional standpoint, I suppose some parents will find it comforting have the magical word ‘murder’ applied, but that doesn’t ‘protect’ squat.

    Just like they’re lying when they claim TRAP laws are designed to ‘protect’ women, they’re lying when they claim that laws like this are about anything other than gaining the definition and rights of ‘personhood’ for fetuses. The law only protects them if you’re using it as a springboard toward restricting or banning abortion.

  • vulgarism
    • Shan

      That’s hilarious and sad at the same time.

Mobile Theme