Supreme Court Considering Request to Extend Hobby Lobby Ruling to Nonprofits (Updated)


UPDATE, July 3, 5:05 p.m.: Late Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled Wheaton College could receive the religious accommodation to the birth control benefit. Like the Court did last year in the Little Sisters of the Poor case, the Court created an alternative to filling out the EBSA Form 700, which is at the heart of the nonprofits’ legal challenge.

Read more of our coverage on the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood cases here.

The Supreme Court is expected to rule soon on a request by a religiously affiliated nonprofit to find that even with its accommodation, the birth control benefit in the Affordable Care Act violates the organization’s religious liberties.

Wheaton College, a religiously affiliated college located in Illinois, filed the request in the wake of Monday’s ruling in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, asking the Roberts Court to issue an emergency ruling exempting the organization from complying with the law. Like other religiously affiliated nonprofits challenging the accommodation, Wheaton College argues that the process laid out by the Obama administration to receive the accommodation is too burdensome. In that process, an objecting institution files a form with the government to request the exemption on the grounds of a sincerely held religious belief. Once that form is filed, a third-party insurer steps in and coordinates coverage for those employees or students who want it.

But, according to Wheaton College and other nonprofits like Little Sisters of the Poor and the University of Notre Dame, the mere act of filing out the exemption form that triggers third-party administration of the coverage imposes a substantial burden on its religious beliefs.

On Monday, the Roberts Court granted Wheaton College a temporary delay of the July 1 deadline for the college to either take advantage of the accommodation or comply with the ACA’s coverage requirements. By midweek, the Obama administration responded to Wheaton College’s request in a brief filed with the Court, arguing its accommodation sufficiently protects any religious objections Wheaton College or other nonprofits have to the coverage requirements and urging the Supreme Court to reject Wheaton’s request.

The college is expected to file a brief replying to the administration’s arguments on Thursday. The Roberts Court has already indicated that its ruling in Burwell applies to the birth control benefit generally.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with contact director of communications Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

Follow Jessica Mason Pieklo on twitter: @hegemommy

  • kitler

    I love how signing a document is considered an undue burden. They dont want women using birth control, period.

    • Shan

      Nevermind all the extra research and paperwork anybody who needs BC is going to have to do to work around the exemption. None of that is an undue burden, of course.

  • TheBrett

    They can’t sign a document? Yeah, this is bullshit. They’re pretty clearly trying to blunt the ability of their employees to get access to contraception coverage, or at least trying to avoid having to pay for it (while still taking advantage of the tax deduction and their employees’ premiums).

  • Suba gunawardana

    Looks like they won’t be satisfied until this is officially a third world nation with standing room only and starving children roaming the streets (if there are any streets left).