Not the ‘Illuminati’: How Fundamentalist Christians Are Infiltrating State and Federal Government


Imagine that a little-known but increasingly powerful group of ideologues had hatched a plan to transform the United States into a Christian theocracy harkening back to the Dark Ages of Europe, a time when society was governed by the laws and officials of the Catholic Church.

Suppose further that this plan had a scary simple strategy: Recruit bright, young law students; put them through an intensive indoctrination program; place them in plum internships across the country; and watch as they swim upstream until they reach the top of the legal system, where they can create, enforce, and interpret laws according to a legal philosophy infused with fundamentalist Christian theology.

Welcome to the world of the Blackstone Legal Fellowship, an annual program established in 2000 by the Alliance Defending Freedom, an Arizona-based nonprofit that is swiftly emerging as a major behind-the-scenes player in many of the nation’s most controversial legal cases involving reproductive rights, sexual justice, and a vast range of other moral and social disputes.

“[T]he Blackstone Fellowship inspires a distinctly Christian worldview in every area of law, and particularly in the areas of public policy and religious liberty,” states the Alliance’s public tax filing. “With this ongoing program, it’s [the Alliance’s] goal to train a new generation of lawyers who will rise to positions of influence and leadership as legal scholars, litigators, judges—perhaps even Supreme Court Justices—who will work to ensure that justice is carried out in America’s courtrooms.”

While participants hail from various denominations, they all commit to using their legal careers to “reorder society” according to a “christendomic” worldview, in which there is no separation between church and state.

“The Blackstone Legal Fellowship renewed my conviction that working for cultural change is not polishing brass on a sinking ship,” wrote Alana Hake on the Blackstone website. “Victories in the area of pro-life, religious liberty, and family values not only have the potential to preserve individuals’ lives and enable them to hear of salvation, but also to glorify God as society is reordered bit by bit according to His design.”

That means no abortion rights, no marriage equality, and a view of the First Amendment so radical and expansive that merely asserting a religious objection to state or federal laws—be they health insurance laws, or anti-discrimination statutes—would permit individuals to be exempt.

Blackstone Fellows have yet to make it to the U.S. Supreme Court, but based on the progress of the 1,351 alumni so far, the plan appears to be succeeding.

Blackstone alumni have risen to positions of influence in state and federal courts, federal government agencies, and congressional committees and offices, as well as positions at the United Nations and other intergovernmental agencies, a review of public documents, online profiles, and public records requests by RH Reality Check shows.

In Missouri, a former Blackstone Fellow, Kevin Corlew, is running for the state’s 14th congressional district in this year’s elections. Another, Bradley Cowan, is the chief of the administrative law division at the 101st Airborne Division at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, according to his profile on LinkedIn. And based on our review of public records, the offices of attorneys and solicitors general in at least eight states—Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Michigan, Oklahoma, Texas, and Virginia—have hosted Blackstones as interns, jobs in which fellows help draft memos and pleadings for the most powerful lawmakers in their states and, more importantly, forge the contacts that will propel them to their own positions of power.

Advocates for the separation of church and state told RH Reality Check that placing Blackstones in secular positions with the power to write, enforce, and apply laws was worrisome, because “any attempt to merge church and state is dangerous because it leads us down the path to theocracy.”

“They [members of the Alliance] don’t want there to be any legal abortion because they say that violates the Bible. They don’t want gays and lesbians to have rights because they think that violates their interpretation of the Bible. … They want our public institutions, including our school system, to be saturated with their religious beliefs,” said Rob Boston, communications director for Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, who researched the Alliance Defending Freedom for his recently published book. “When you add all that up, that, to me, looks like a church-state union. It looks like a Middle Ages nation with modern-day technology. And that scares me.”

Not the “Illuminati”

Since 1994, the Alliance Defending Freedom has been building a network of lawyers in public and private practice, “to keep the door open for the spread of the Gospel by transforming the legal system,” according to its website.

Today, the Alliance has more than $40 million in assets, according to its most recent auditor’s report, and is becoming an increasing force in the conservative legal arena.

Through legal actions and its various legal training programs, the nonprofit focuses on fighting for the criminalization of abortion; against the rights of LGBT people; for so-called religious liberty (which often comes in the form of defending clients who wish to discriminate against gay people based on their religious beliefs); and for organized Christian prayer in government or public-school settings, such as its most recent victory—last week’s Supreme Court ruling upholding legislative prayer in Town of Greece v. Galloway, in which the Alliance represented the plaintiffs.

The group also runs a legal academy, which gives practicing attorneys free training in defending cases involving same-sex marriage, abortion, and church/state issues. In return, participants must provide 450 hours of “pro bono/dedicated legal work on behalf of the Body of Christ.”

While these are the public stances of the Alliance, as we reported, the group has also played a growing and crucial behind-the-scenes role in sculpting and coordinating briefs from state attorneys general in the Hobby Lobby case that was argued in the U.S. Supreme Court in March.

And when it comes to the Blackstone Fellowship, the group is decidedly secretive.

In answers provided to RH Reality Check, the Alliance’s spokesperson, Greg Scott, said that there have been 1,351 Blackstone Fellows to date, with 154 in this year’s class. He said that about a third of applicants were accepted and that the Alliance “hopes all students who go through Blackstone establish lifelong friendships and achieve lifetime success at every level in every area of the legal profession.”

But that is where the transparency stopped.

The Alliance does not appear to publicize the relationship between the Blackstone Legal Fellowship and state attorneys general, and Scott told us that “recruiting efforts rely primarily on word-of-mouth referrals through Blackstone Fellows who have enjoyed their experience and encourage others to apply.”

Scott declined to break down the demographics of the Blackstone alumni, saying only that “women and men of many races and ethnicities have been accepted into Blackstone.”

“We don’t share specific names, demographic information, or detailed personal information of students and faculty without express permission,” he said.

That position appears to be in keeping with the Alliance’s secrecy surrounding the Blackstone Fellowship.

During a 2012 radio interview, Jordan Lorence, senior counsel at the Alliance, appeared to acknowledge that there are some “pretty high-level people that participate” in Blackstone, but declined to name them. He then reassured the host, Tom Brown, that there was no clandestine plot at work.

“There’s not some hidden conspiracy or something like that going on here,” Lorence said. “There’s no dark Illuminati or something like that.”

Despite the high degree of secrecy, using public records requests, LinkedIn, and other online resources, RH Reality Check was able to locate more than 130 Blackstone alumni, from the 2001 cohort until present. Our research indicates that many of these individuals have clerked for multiple state judges, federal judges, state attorneys general, and are in the midst of working their way upwards in the echelons of government.

While there does appear to be a fair gender balance amongst known Blackstone alumni, of the ones we were able to identify, they are overwhelmingly white and, of course, exclusively Christian.

That is in keeping with the Blackstone Legal Fellowship’s website, which says that fellows are selected based on their “demonstrated Christian commitment, motivation to engage popular legal culture, leadership potential in a legal context, evidence of oral and written communication skills, and academic achievement.”

Throughout the Blackstone Legal Fellowship website, in tax forms, on YouTube videos, and in radio interviews, the Alliance Defending Freedom has described the mission of the fellowship program to indoctrinate law students with a specific worldview.

“One of the greatest blessings of my life as leader in the Alliance Defense Fund ministry is the Blackstone Legal Fellowship,” said Alan Sears, the Alliance’s president, CEO, and general counsel, in a video published to YouTube on January 14, 2010. “This is the time when we see the brightest and best law students in America, who love Jesus, come together for nine weeks to learn how to serve Him effectively, how to integrate their faith and the law.”

Indeed, part of the nine-week program includes a rigorous reading guide that lists tomes by scholars widely considered to hold radical religious views—a reality openly acknowledged by the Alliance, which warns that:

Some materials may even contain assertions that may be construed (or misconstrued) to be unnecessarily sectarian, or even offensive to one’s particular theological or ecclesiastical tradition. No offense and certainly, no proselytizing, is intended. Rather, Alliance Defending Freedom seeks to recover the robust Christendomic theology of the 3rd, 4th, and 5th centuries.

The list includes Gary DeMar, Andrew P. Sandlin, and the late Dr. D. James Kennedy and Greg L. Bahnsen, advocates and former leaders of the once-resurgent and controversial Christian Reconstructionism movement, a fundamentalist Calvinist movement that advocates for a theocratic national government combined with libertarian economic principles.

DeMar, who runs The American Vision, a “Biblical Worldview Ministry,” has a history of making extreme comments in his writings and on his radio program, the Gary DeMar Show. After Hillary Clinton and Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH) expressed their support for same-sex marriage last year (Portman’s son had recently come out of the closet), DeMar compared being gay to being a pedophile, murderer, and slave owner, reported Right Wing Watch.

“Would Senator Rob Portman throw his support behind pedophilia if he had learned that his son was a pedophile?” DeMar blogged. “Would he support adultery if his son was an adulterer? Would he support slavery if he found out that one of his relatives was a slave owner and argued persuasively that owning slaves was legitimate? Would the Senator Rob Portman support his son if he learned that he was selling drugs to children? Would he support contract killing if he learned that his son was a contract killer for the mob? Senator Rob Portman’s son has made a bad moral choice. There is no need to compound that bad moral choice by capitulating to it and softening the moral barriers for young men and women who are struggling with their sexuality and helping to pass laws that will affect millions of people.”

And, of course, there’s Sir William Blackstone himself, an 18th century English judge and Oxford University law professor, whose Commentaries on the Laws of England laid the basis of the idea of “natural law”—considered to be God’s law—and who is credited with laying the foundation for university legal education in England and North America.

Greg Scott said in an email that the Alliance Defending Freedom’s employees do not necessarily fit the mold of the “right-wing fundamentalist” Christian. He said that the Alliance’s staff members practice a wide range of Christian denominations—“Catholics, Baptists, Presbyterians, Anglicans, Lutherans, Nazarene, and more.” He also noted that some employees oppose the death penalty and support environmental causes. However, these issues are not generally represented in the organization’s legal practice.

Rob Boston, of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, told RH Reality Check that he was surprised when he first came across the reference to ancient Christendomic theology on Blackstone’s website.

“It just struck me as so incredible that anyone would just say that openly, that that was their goal for a model society,” he said.

The Alliance Defending Freedom covers the bulk of Blackstone Fellows’ expenses, including airfare, lodging, and “most meals” for two out of the program’s three phases that take place in Phoenix, and usually students’ lodging during the internship phase. Fellows can also apply for a $6,300 scholarship.

Employees in State AG Offices Seek to “Help” Extreme Christian Agenda

Earlier this year, RH Reality Check received a slate of internal emails from the West Virginia Office of the Attorney General, in response to a public records request.

One piece of correspondence that is particularly curious is a set of emails from Julie Marie Blake—who was then a law clerk with the solicitor general—from the fall of 2013. The emails comprise a series of correspondence between Blake and multiple Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys.

Blake explained that she had recently moved to West Virginia and had taken up her new post, and asked for prayers from the Alliance officials that she would pass her state bar exam.

Blake then proceeded to ask the Alliance attorneys whether the West Virginia solicitor general could “help” the Alliance.

“Please let me know if I can ever do anything to help your efforts – the SG [solicitor general] is always looking for new suits to bring or amicus ideas,” Blake emailed Alliance Defending Freedom senior counsel Gregory S. Baylor on September 19, 2013.

In the same email, she mentioned the Blackstone Fellowship program.

“I’ve been speaking with Colene—she is going to try to place a Blackstone here with us next summer,” Blake wrote, presumably referring to Colene Lewis, Blackstone’s director of alumni.

Neither Blake nor the Alliance would confirm with us whether or not she previously worked or interned with the Alliance or whether she participated in the Blackstone Legal Fellowship. A spokesperson for the attorney general’s office declined to comment. However, Blake’s familiarity with many of the directors and legal counsel at the Alliance and Blackstone suggests that could be the case.

And that would be problematic, according to Greg Lipper, a senior litigation counsel at Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which often appears on opposing sides of the same cases as the Alliance Defending Freedom.

“I think that does raise especially significant concern, both the apparent recruiting of lawyers on the basis of their religious beliefs or their religious training on the one hand and the fact that she’s so eager to have [the Alliance] sort of supply its increasingly retrograde ideas as a basis for government policy,” Lipper said in an interview.

In response, the Alliance’s spokesperson said he was “not aware of any constitutional principle prohibiting students from a particular ideological, philosophical, or religious background from applying for governmental internships. In fact, such a prohibition could very well violate constitutional and federal law provisions that protect against discrimination.”

Lipper and other critics emphasized that their concerns dealt not with the idea of Christian lawyers interning or working in government but that such lawyers would serve the government with a particular religious-focused agenda.

West Virginia is far from the only state that has accepted interns from the Alliance Defending Freedom.

Our public records requests disclosed that Blackstone Fellows have worked in at least eight other states: Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Michigan, Oklahoma, Texas, and Virginia.

In early December 2012, Sumi Thomas, the director of recruitment for the Blackstone Legal Fellowship, reached out to the Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General, emailing a contact given to her by Aaron Stewart, a Blackstone Fellow who had been interning with the AG’s office earlier that year. In her email Thomas explained that, at that time, Blackstone interns were also placed in attorneys general offices in Alabama, Indiana, Michigan, Texas, and Virginia. RH Reality Check has also found that the Alliance’s legal interns have served in attorneys general offices in Arizona and Georgia.

In its description of the program emailed to the Oklahoma AG’s office, the Alliance refers to the office as an “allied organization.”

Stewart was eventually hired to work for the AG’s office full time and currently serves as an assistant attorney general, according to his LinkedIn profile and emails between Stewart and a Blackstone recruiter obtained by RH Reality Check through public records requests.

The following fall, the Alliance’s Thomas again reached out to the Oklahoma attorney general’s office about hiring Blackstone interns.

On September 20, 2013, Oklahoma’s first assistant attorney general, Tom Bates, responded positively to Thomas’ inquiry.

“We were extremely pleased with Jared and hope he will consider joining us as an AAG [assistant attorney general] upon graduation,” wrote Bates, referring to Jared Haines, a Blackstone Fellow who served in the AG’s office in the summer of 2013. “So, we would definitely welcome another intern next summer.”

Haines’ LinkedIn profile currently lists him as a JD candidate at the University of Chicago Law School.

In the same email thread, Bates explained the general scope of the work given to legal interns, which included assisting with cases currently in litigation.

“This interns [sic] works directly with the AG, First Assistant, Chief of Staff, and Solicitor General,” Bates said. “Work includes legal research and drafting of memos, legal documents, and opinions on issues of importance to the executive staff. This intern will also assist the First Assistant and Solicitor General with cases in litigation.”

The Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General did not respond to multiple requests for comment regarding its relationship with the Alliance Defending Freedom and the Blackstone Legal Fellowship.

Brady Henderson, the legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma, said in an interview that Blackstone’s religious mission—for fellows to integrate their faith with the law—presents a potential conflict of interest when they’re put to work for government.

“These interns, in theory, if they’re interning for the state, they’re not supposed to be doing something with a religious purpose,” Henderson said. “In other words, they’re not there to proselytize. They’re also not there to create a certain religious outcome. And yet their fellowship or internship may have that exact purpose. So in a sense, what it creates is a conflict of interest.”

Representatives of other state attorneys general told RH Reality Check they accept Blackstone fellows but do not give them preferential treatment.

Indiana’s attorney general’s office has accepted five Blackstone Fellows since 2012, according to public information officer Erin Reece, who noted that the state AG’s office employs 60 interns annually. The fifth Blackstone Fellow is scheduled to serve Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller this summer.

In an email sent to representatives of the Indiana AG’s office in September 2013, upon thanking them for accepting three Blackstone Fellows in 2013, the Alliance’s Sumi Thomas asked the AG’s solicitor general office to consider accepting a Blackstone Fellow for the summer of 2014. “If the Solicitor General’s Office is willing to accept interns from the Blackstone Legal Fellowship for the summer of 2014, please let me know and I will call you to discuss details via phone,” Thomas wrote.

“All interns are hired based on their academic and legal qualifications,” Reece said in an email. “Our recruitment process includes attending diversity job fairs, conducting on-campus interviews at approximately eight law schools and receiving resumes from various clinical programs at law schools and legal fellowships such as the Blackstone and Steiger fellowships, among others. The recruitment and consideration process is similar for all schools, legal fellowships and entities with which we have a relationship.”

Reece said her office “follows the proper legal parameters of separation of church and state” in response to our question about Blackstone’s Christian mission, explaining that her office is prohibited from asking job or internship applicants about their religious views or affiliations. She also emphasized that interns are given “basic, entry-level legal work.”

Georgia’s attorney general’s office accepted one Blackstone Fellow last summer and will possibly have another Blackstone Fellow this summer, said Lauren Kane, the office’s communications director, who said the office primarily accepts applicants from law schools. “We do not have any sort of formal relationship with Blackstone by which we ‘host’ their participants, but will consider Blackstone applicants when they apply (and we do require them to go through the application process),” Kane said in an email.

Several state AG’s offices responding to RH Reality Check’s inquiry said they had never hired Blackstone interns, including offices in Idaho, Maryland, Oregon, and Rhode Island. AG offices in Connecticut and Wisconsin said they had never hired Blackstone Fellows and have no plans to. Many other states failed to reply to our requests in time for deadline.

“Heroes” or “Bigots”

In keeping with their religious and radical political views, Blackstone Fellows have helped shape many of the nation’s most famous recent lawsuits.

In the summer of 2012, two Blackstone Fellows—Matt Mellema and Jonathan Lee —interned for a conservative think tank and were at the time writing briefs and researching for cases involving constitutional challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and California’s ban on same-sex marriage, respectively, both of which were heard by the Supreme Court in 2013.

The Alliance Defending Freedom’s side would go on to lose these cases, but the two Blackstone Fellows expressed their delight at being involved in such high-stakes litigation.

“I didn’t think coming into law school that at this point I would be working on a case that everybody I know has heard of,” Mellema—currently a law student at Yale University Law School and a sometimes contributor to Slate—told sometimes Blackstone lecturer Hugh Hewitt on his Hugh Hewitt radio show in July 2012. “I’m either a hero or a bigot, depending on who you are.”

During the broadcast, Lee, then earning his law degree at the New York University School of Law, told Hewitt it was hard to learn the “Christian point of view” of legal concepts outside of the Blackstone program.

Of course, even when Blackstones find themselves on the losing side of a case, they are nevertheless building the personal and professional networks that could help propel their careers.

And that goal appears to be working. While the Alliance declined to name any alumni, the organization claims that 356 fellows had acted as clerks for state and federal judges as of 2013.

Through our use of public records and publicly available information, RH Reality Check has been able to identify 135 Blackstone alumni, representing around 10 percent of the total alumni pool. It’s an unscientific sample, but our results give some insight into the program’s success in having its graduates fan out throughout U.S. government posts. (Where we have been able to find the year in which an individual participated in the Blackstone program, we have included that information in the following summary.)

Among our other findings:

  • RH Reality Check’s research identified more than 40 individuals who have clerked for state and federal judges. Many of these people held more than one clerkship, and between them, they have filled nearly 60 of what are prestigious roles. See a full list in RHRC Data, our new interactive search tool.
  • Blackstones have worked in at least 26 roles in the federal government, including:
    • Carissa Mulder, 2007, special assistant/counsel at U.S. Commission on Civil Rights;
    • Brian Barnes, 2012, attorney advisor, Social Security Administration and formerly Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals;
    • S L Whitesell, 2012, law clerk, U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee, staff of Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) (currently, Whitesell is clerking for the Texas Office of the Attorney General);
    • Clayton Collins, 2012, legal extern on Judiciary Committee Legislation for Congressman Trent Franks (R-AZ.);
    • Esther Slater McDonald, counsel to the associate attorney general, U.S. Department of Justice.
  • Blackstones have filled at least 11 roles in state agencies, including in the Sacramento Public Defender’s Office, the Government and Consumer Frauds Bureau in Nassau County, New York; policy and program analyst at the huge teachers’ pension system, CalSTRS, in Sacramento, California; and in other roles everywhere from Tennessee to Virginia.
  • They have filled roles in the military:
    • Michael Berry, 2003, attorney with the U.S. Marine Corps; appellate defense attorney, 2009-2013; invited to serve as an adjunct professor of law at the United States Naval Academy; deployed to Afghanistan in 2008;
    • Peter Cairns, 2010, Defense in Support of Civilian Authorities (DSCA) Action Officer at National Guard Bureau;
    • Megan Jaye, 2007, Assistant Counsel for Legislation, Fiscal and General Law at U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
  • And they have held positions at the United Nations and other intergovernmental organizations:
    • David Allen, 2013, House of Commons research assistant in London
    • Lisa Giunta, 2009, judicial law clerk, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and formerly United Nations extern, International Development Law Organization, permanent observer to the UN;
    • Tania Soris, 2011, formerly Commonwealth Lawyers Association.

And one, Kevin Corlew, a former Nevada Supreme Court clerk, is now running for Congress in Missouri’s 14th district.

Corlew did not reply to RH Reality Check’s emails or voicemails. However, Corlew has made known his position on at least one of the Alliance’s hot-button issues.

“Life at all stages must be respected,” reads a statement on his website. “I supported the Missouri Legislature in passing the late-term, post-viability abortion ban in 2011.”

Corlew is far from the only Blackstone to have advanced both his career and his views.

G. David Mathues completed the Blackstone Fellowship in 2005, according to his LinkedIn profile. He went on to serve in other high-influence positions, including a year as judicial clerk for Chief Judge Danny J. Boggs of the Sixth Circuit.

In 2009, Mathues published an article in Engage Magazine, in which he argued that courts should take a more expansive view of the U.S. Constitution’s “ministerial exception” which gives religious institutions “broad freedom in selecting their leaders.”

Mathues advocated widening the definition of who is a “minister” so that it included employees such as teachers at religious schools. And of course, in this context, “selecting” leaders is code for “firing” them due to religious issues.

Today, Mathues is an assistant state attorney in Cook County, Illinois. He did not return RH Reality Check’s call for comment.

Perhaps the most significant of the Blackstone Fellows RH Reality Check was able to locate was Michael Bowman, who is now senior counsel at the Alliance Defending Freedom.

Bowman completed the Blackstone Fellowship in 2001 and “clerked for several federal judges, including The Honorable Samuel A. Alito, Jr., at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit,” according to his Alliance biography.

Alito, of course, has since risen to become a justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.

The potential potency of these connections was apparent earlier this month when the Supreme Court issued its decision in Town of Greece v. Galloway, in which, as we noted earlier, the Alliance represented the winning party—the town.

Alito voted with the majority to uphold the town’s practice of saying a prayer before official meetings—a decision that has widely been interpreted as crumbling the separation between church and state.

At issue in the case was not that the town was holding prayers before town meetings, but that the prayers—delivered by mostly Christian clergy—were largely sectarian; thus it was perceived by the plaintiffs that the government was officially aligning with a particular faith: Christianity.

Alito also wrote a concurring opinion—in which Justice Antonin Scalia joined him—that fleshed out his views that the U.S. Constitution’s separation of church and state does not prevent governments from incorporating religious prayer into their government meetings, and ridiculed the idea that towns could “prescreen” those prayers.

As any lawyer knows, part of the value of serving as a clerk for a judge is the formation of a relationship of trust and familiarity, so that when you appear as a lawyer in that judge’s courtroom, your arguments are more likely to be given weight.

While the Alliance has yet to see one of its Blackstone alumni actually reach the Supreme Court, when it comes to Bowman and Alito, they have arguably achieved something very close to that.

“They’re not doing anything illegal,” said Rob Boston. “They’re training lawyers and urging them to go into court and push the law in a more conservative direction. If the American people are alarmed about that, they have to respond in ways to push back. But this is all part of a larger plan that the religious right has been building up for a long time.”

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Follow Sofia Resnick on twitter: @SofiaResnick

Follow Sharona Coutts on twitter: @sharonacoutts

  • purrtriarchy

    Dominionists!

    • fiona64

      Yep … and, oftentimes, Reconstructionists in the vein of Rushdoony … who want to go back to Biblical era *punishments,* such as being able to stone people to death. There is something fundamentally wrong with these people, you should pardon the pun.

  • http://hotdogandbun.com/ericsandoval/ Venom of the Day

    There is no greater threat to national security or global stability than THESE people. Fundamentalist Christians, who more often than not believe in an Antichrist character that is more Hollywood than Biblical, ARE the only Antichrist there will ever be. Nobody is more anti Christ than they are. PLUCK THEM!!

  • stevie1910

    This is not good.

  • bvocal

    At the end of the day I can not for the life of me figure out why anyone would even want to have Christian or another religion, government. (all the while screaming about how they want freedom….!)

    • lady_black

      They fall into two categories. Those with ambitions of power and oppression, and the merely “dim bulbs.” I went to the Alliance website and found out one of my friends “likes” these people on Facebook. Let me tell you about her. She’s a nice enough person, but definitely not the sharpest knife in the drawer. She once made a comment on her “wall” that we “needed to get ‘god’ back in the schools.” My reply was “Who’s ‘god’?” She didn’t really have an answer. I’d like to believe I made her think, if only temporarily. I don’t think most people know how dangerous religious extremists really are. They talk a good “line.” Family values, protecting marriage, sanctity of life, religious freedom, etc. They all sound like good ideas until you get into the specifics of what they REALLY mean, which is the antithesis of good ideas. They mean harming gay families, depriving people of the right to marry based on sexual orientation, sanctity of life only for embryos and fetuses (women, not so much… lives taken in wars, not so much), and freedom of THEIR religion to be imposed on YOU.

      • L-dan

        The ‘dim bulbs’ all seem to be about having God in his rightful place in society, like when they were growing up, not thinking about the fact that putting ‘God’ back into things means putting ‘Gods/Goddesses’ back into things unless they’re willing to go the route of Theocracy. Most of them at least back down a bit when you ask if they really think their non-Christian neighbors should be shut out of public life.

  • FranktheMc

    Well, I’m Roman Catholic. If these people get into power, I’ll be on the first death camp train.

    • Nicko Thime

      Not to worry. The catholic church will fund rise off of your death. They need it for gold decorations and silk vestments. Those weird hats must be expensive.

    • Carleton MacDonald

      I’m an Episcopalian. They’ll come for us first, before you.

    • Chris Candide

      Wow.That’s interesting. Especially since their CEO is a Roman Catholic.

    • colleen2

      Please. The coalition formed by the religious right is composed of the leadership of the Roman Catholic church, the LDS church, the Southern Baptist convention, about 85% of Evangelicals. Likewise, a majority of Opus Dei Catholics form our current SCOTUS. Which is to say that it’s your Church trying to impose it’s demeaning dogma about the place and role of women onto all women. Because to the religious right we are nothing more than breeding livestock and chattel. So, please stop pretending that your church is an ally to women or that real problem is that Catholics will be persecuted. It’s the Catholic church doing the persecuting and killing people on the “death camp train”.
      Y’all need to man up and acknowledge the truth about what your church has done and continues to do politically. They are a force of evil.

  • https://soundcloud.com/injektofficial Andreas George

    Behold, the people who are destroying America.

  • aought

    I believe history shows that a minority with power has often ruled over a majority.

  • Richard La France

    They are working in tandem with the politicians who have infiltrated both state and federal governments. Declaring this a Christian nation is a part of the corporate takeover agenda. They will never admit to being White Supremacists but that’s exactly what they are. Sure, they have a few persons of other races planted here and there but once the takeover has been completed (that will come with the President’s sign-off on the TPP) their law will be the new law and our Democracy and our Constitution will be dead.

    We don’t need more prisons, especially not the prisons for profit types. We need more mental health hospitals and these people, including their partners in the Tea Party, need to be pinned to the rubber walls forever. I will be sending the link to this article to Senator Bernie Sanders. My representatives have rejected me because I did what I was told all my life I should do: I wrote to my representatives. And mine are Democrats.

  • Tothiwim

    Religion is the criminal abandonment of reason. Our future depends on enough people who see religion as a stigma to get off the couch and vote.

  • Arekushieru

    Who cares? Quite frankly, I am Christian and White. I could care less if either population disappears from the planet, entirely.

  • ORAXX

    The spirit of the inquisition lives on.

  • fiona64

    And so what? It’s a pluralistic, secular nation. If you want to live in a theocracy, I understand that Afghanistan is lovely.

  • grantal

    Much of this insanity is being caused by climate change. When the climate heats up or there are natural disasters, flooding ,droughts, fires, earthquakes, people must move which causes conflicts among them and their differences. In other words, there are too damned many of us on this planet and we all really do not get along well with others. Sad but true. the irony of it al is that agriculture and companies like Monsanto which say they are doing good by feeding all these people are actually the most to blame. Growing monocrops to feed this many is stripping land of trees and depleting the top soil. In animal agriculture (the worst culprit) water and land are even more abused. It is a no win situation and the nuts are really coming out of the woodwork at a rapid pace . Their hate will kill them and the climate disasters will kill the rest of us off.

  • L-dan

    Can’t happen soon enough. The sooner these retrograde, anti-intellectual creeps find themselves without the power to influence society, the better off we’ll all be.

  • Nicko Thime

    History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes.

    -Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt, Dec. 6, 1813.

    Fundamentalism is a mental disease. It is a disease whether it be applied to religion, politics(see tea baggers), or economics (see trickle down).
    Religious fundamentalism compounds the problem by combining two forms of mental illness. It should be avoided as one avoids the plague, STD’s, or poisons.
    Our founders INTENTIONALLY left gawd and religion out of our government for extremely good reasons.
    “The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe in blood for centuries.” Madison

    Mr. Madison sought a “PERFECT SEPARATION”much to the dismay of religio-freaks who claim otherwise. We should honor his wishes and do everything we can to keep religion from infecting our government because theocracy is just a form of totalitarianism, no matter which magical being you claim is real.

  • Nicko Thime

    GREAT NEWS. Makes my day to hear it. The sooner we leave belief in magical beings behind, the better.

  • Anon rust

    Fuck.

    This is difficult to read and try to overcome the PASSIONATE DESIRE to herd these people inside an electrified fence.

  • Brian

    Umm. I don’t think you understand that pro-choice means. It means supporting the right of people to make their own choice. You seem to think it means your right to choose for everyone. No thanks.

  • 503me

    The American Taliban in the making and their intended goal is to make our country a corporate owned theocracy. The only way to shop or is to shine the light on everything they do.

  • Kevin Schmidt

    Of course there are financial benefits, as well as legal benefits, with gay marriage, just like there are with heterosexual marriages. Your homophobia is clouding your fearful mind.

  • Suba gunawardana

    And yet they claim to hate the Moslems. “Our oppression is better than yours”, except that it’s exactly the same.

  • LaurenceQuint

    Hail Hydra.

    Fuck these people.

  • john649

    @johnny – this is an IDIOTIC comment!
    Why do ‘christians’ even bother to have children. They all just end up being indoctrinated into this cult where they allow pedophiles running the churches to control them who in turn spend all their time destroying this country for everyone.

  • john649

    ahhh, so you want to the American Taliban to hurry up and turn the USA into another Afghanistan. What a beautiful human you are.

  • john649

    Further proof that RELIGION is the root of all evil. Their churches are filled with pedophiles, child abusers and their mind-controlled dogma is turning their soldiers into zombie extremists. Watch out for our Supreme Court male extremists to slow push this agenda.

  • SeattleJeff

    Back to FoxNation for you.

  • colleen2

    That would be lovely. I particularly look forward to the day when the USA is not majority white. The folks who think that is important make me sick to my stomach

  • Humfree1859@yahoo.com

    This article is a very fine exposition of a large piece of a gigantic tapestry of intrigue and subversive Fundamentalist activity. These machinations are designed to replace the principals and practices set in place by the founders of this nation, with a theocracy of terrible dimensions. I have been looking at the parameters of this envelopment for many years, and sometimes wondered if I fit the characteristics of a conspiracy theorist. In the last several years, I decided I didn’t and that I could see patterns and organizations working to destroy the values I really hold dear: individual freedom and the right to maximize my potentials within a fair and egalitarian society ordered by an impartial justice system. Sometimes, it appears that the secular groups opposing the constitutional encroachments of Fundamentalism, are simply nibbling around the edges and that the radical religionists have been achieving their goals despite a few loses of public prayer, public display of religious symbols, and official rejection of creationism and ID in education. I have read a large number of your comments, and find that you seem aware and very concerned about the dangers these people represent. However, I also found you have no concrete answers as to how we move to squash and nullify the actions taken by Fundamentalists. Part of the solution has to be in the political arena with selection of political issues and candidates. Another part has to do with childhood and adult education in thinking, skepticism, and scientific inquiry. As the number of citizens grow who claim a religious unaffiliated status, we need to find paths to tell other people how we feel and how we arrived at our conclusions. Similarly, the religious among us who believe in the separation of church and state have to come forward in every venue to exclaim the virtue of keeping supernatural dogma out of government. If you’ve read this far, thank you!

  • Jennifer Starr

    Flagged for off-topic spam of your atrociously written article and website.

  • Jennifer Starr

    Actually, ending a pregnancy is responsible. And if you don’t believe in gay marriage, you don’t have to have one. Problem solved.

  • Jennifer Starr

    Is there actual sense to be made out of your word salad?

  • Jennifer Starr

    None of which is a bad thing, at least not to sane persons.