Procedural Vote Blocks Gillibrand’s Military Sexual Assault Bill


After a year of focused debate, advocates for changing a culture of rampant sexual assault within the military were rebuked by a 55-45 procedural vote in the Senate Thursday that did not allow the measure to advance to a full vote.

The Military Justice Improvement Act (S. 1752), sponsored by Sen. Kristen Gillibrand (D-NY), would remove the chain of command from the adjudication process for military sexual assault. Supporters of the blocked measure said the bill would make it more likely that victims would report crimes and see justice.

Upon its failure to proceed to a general vote on Gillibrand’s proposal, the Senate voted to advance the Victims Protection Act (S. 1917), sponsored by Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), which would retain the authority of the commanders to deal with sexual assault within their ranks and introduce other, more moderate, reforms designed to lessen the occurrence of sexual assault within the military.

The floor debate Thursday was polite yet passionate, and focused more on support or opposition to Gillibrand’s proposal rather than the merits of one approach over the other. McCaskill’s supporters spent most of their floor time describing why they opposed the Military Justice Improvement Act rather than why they supported the reforms proposed in the Victims Protection Act. Speaking to her measure shortly before the vote, Gillibrand implored the chamber to “listen to the victims” and characterized arguments on the floor against her measure as technical in focus.

As covered extensively by Adele Stan for RH Reality Check, Gillibrand has tenaciously pursued her measure. The senator went into the floor debate with 55 known supporters of her bill, including not just reliable advocates for improving conditions for women in the military, such as Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), but also more conservative members, including Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Rand Paul (R-KY), and David Vitter (R-LA).

Speaking on the floor against Gillibrand’s measure, Sen. McCaskill said, “We cannot let the commanders walk away.” She was joined by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who spoke to the matter of sexual assault in the military with a view likely not shared by the scores of those victimized. “The worst thing that could happen in a unit is for the commander to say that this is no longer my problem,” he said. Also opposing the Gillibrand measure and supporting the McCaskill proposal was Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK), who serves as ranking member on the Armed Services Committee.

The Pentagon estimated in a report for the 2012 fiscal year that there were 26,000 incidents of sexual assault within the military, with fewer than 3,400 of them reported.

Having failed to proceed to a general vote, the Military Justice Improvement Act has been returned to the full Senate calendar.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Follow Erin Matson on Twitter: @erintothemax

To schedule an interview with Erin Matson please contact Communications Director Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • L-dan

    How does removing reporting from the chain of command make it no longer those commander’s problem? Don’t they think convictions would reflect rather poorly upon those commanders?

    Oh wait, you mean that we prefer to continue making it the commander’s problem in that they’ll still have control over an issue that it benefits them to minimize and cover up? Well, I can see why the commanders might prefer that. I really don’t.

  • fiona64

    McCaskill’s bill won’t help anything.

    My source: primary. When I was backed into a corner by a soldier who then committed frottage on me, the chain of command gave me a letter of reprimand for yelling at him to “get the f*** away from me,” and my own boss made jokes about sexual harassment constantly.

    When that soldier left the unit, the JAG officer brought the unit’s copy of my LoR to my desk and tore it up in front of me, saying “this bullshit never happened.” The unit hadn’t wanted to ‘destroy the reputation of a good soldier’ … despite their stated “zero tolerance for sexual harassment” policy.

    I guess we really *didn’t* learn anything from Tailhook. /showing my age

    • fiona64

      And … from what I read today, the McCaskill bill was passed unanimously. Which means that nothing will change.

  • Arona

    Is there a way to see how each Senator voted?