Anti-Choice Lawmakers Claim Affordable Care Act Will Result in Government Providing Abortion Coverage

Some anti-choice politicians who have long opposed the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are now focusing on the health insurance plans of Congress members, saying the federal health-care law will result in the government funding abortions.

Members of Congress and their staff will eventually use the same state-based health insurance programs that other people in the United States will be able to access under the ACA. Some of those state plans may offer customers the option of having abortion covered as a medical procedure. Conservative politicians argue that such a move would go against the Hyde Amendment, under which abortion can only be covered using federal funds if the pregnancy is the result of sexual assault or threatens a pregnant person’s health.

“Under this scheme, [the government] will be paying the administrative costs,” Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) told the Washington Post. “It’s a radical deviation and departure from current federal law, and it’s not for all federal employees but for a subset: Congress. Us.”

Allegations of the government inadvertently funding abortion procedures are also present in a new push against Planned Parenthood, with Congressional GOP leaders expressing “concern” over the reproductive health organization’s involvement in helping patients enroll in health insurance programs. For many uninsured Americans who don’t have a primary care provider, visiting Planned Parenthood clinics may be their only way to access health care, and the administration has allocated grant money for some affiliates to help enroll those patients into new open insurance plans.

According to some Republican lawmakers, that means the government is funding abortions. “Money is fungible,” Rep. Diane Black (R-TN) told Fox News. “And so how can we be assured that the money that is being given—when each of these affiliates are required to have abortion services in every one of their clinics—how do you separate that money?”

Planned Parenthood is regularly audited to ensure compliance with all restrictions, and as the International Business Times notes, it has been repeatedly investigated by anti-choice politicians, who have yet to find any instances in which the organization has used federal money to fund abortions. 

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact

Follow Robin Marty on twitter: @robinmarty

  • fiona64

    If they were as “concerned” with women’s health as they claim, they would be thrilled with PP’s work in ensuring that the underprivileged have access to well-woman checks, pre-natal and post-natal care, PAP smears, affordable and effective contraception, and breast cancer screenings.

    But they aren’t “concerned” with any of those things, as we can all see by their actions.

  • L-dan

    And this is why we need to get rid of the Hyde amendment. Screw all the arguments about ‘fungible’ funds. My tax dollars pay for things I’m less than thrilled with (current NSA headlines come to mind), the forced birthers can suck it up and deal with it like everyone else.

  • colleen2

    I believe it was Chuck Grassley who voiced the depths of Republican concern for women’s health when he announced that he would never need Ob-gyn care and did not see why he should have to pay for it.

  • Arachne646

    If these Congressmen really are determined to avoid doing their jobs, they could avoid obsessing over women’s reproductive tracts they don’t understand, and trying repeatedly to repeal the ACA, and other useless activities; by taking up some wholesome hobby like knitting.