Last Abortion Clinic in Toledo May Be Forced to Close

Roughly two months after one of Toledo, Ohio’s two abortion clinics closed, the second clinic has been informed that its license will be suspended and it could be forced to close as well. In both cases, the clinics were unable to secure a hospital transfer agreement at a facility that meets new state criteria.

On June 30, Republican Gov. John Kasich signed the state’s 2014 budget, which included several anti-choice restrictions, among them an amendment forbidding hospitals that accept public funding from having transfer agreements with clinics that provide abortions.

The Capital Care Network clinic in Toledo received a notice from the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) on July 30 informing the clinic that its transfer agreement with the University of Toledo Medical Center was set to expire the following day, on August 1. On the 1st, ODH representatives visited and called Capital Care asking the clinic to produce a current agreement; the department cited the clinic with a violation for continuing to see patients while not having a finalized transfer agreement in place. On its “summary statement of deficiencies,” the department noted that a clinic staffer reported that the clinic does “have another transfer agreement with another hospital although it has not been signed into agreement yet. A transfer agreement was presented that did not have the name of the hospital or the appropriate signatures.”

The following day, August 2, ODH sent a follow-up letter to the clinic noting that the department proposes to “issue an Order revoking and refusing to renew Capital Care Network of Toledo’s health care license (ambulatory surgical facility),” because the clinic did not have a current transfer agreement on file.

As of Thursday morning, the Toledo Capital Care clinic was open and continuing to see patients, the Toledo Blade reports.

The Center for Choice, which had been Toledo’s other legal abortion clinic, closed in May when the University of Toledo Medical Center announced it would discontinue negotiations regarding a transfer agreement with the abortion provider, amid news that the transfer agreement rule was being considered.

Another Capital Care clinic in Ohio closed in April after being cited by the DOH for violations including a lapsed pharmacy license, poor clerical documentation, lack of transfer agreement, and issues surrounding its controlled substances.

Mike Gonidakis, president of Ohio Right to Life, told the Toledo Blade that the potential closure of the city’s last legal abortion clinic is “a great opportunity for women with unexpected pregnancy to go to Toledo pregnancy centers, get some real health care, and find ways to keep the child, raise the child, or put the child up for adoption. The key is to offer more options. … Abortion isn’t the answer.”

Correction: A version of this article incorrectly noted that the Center for Choice closed three months ago. It closed roughly two months ago. We regret the error.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact

Follow Robin Marty on twitter: @robinmarty

  • fiona64

    Wait. Let me understand this. All clinics have to have a hospital transfer agreement, but no hospital that accepts Medicare patients (which is where the Federal funding part comes in) can have hospital transfer agreements with clinics?

    Well, if that isn’t a classic Catch-22, I don’t know what else to call it.

    • L-dan

      It also makes no sense. The only reason to ban hospitals accepting public funds (pretty much all of them) from transfer agreements with abortion clinics is because somehow, providing emergency care in the rare cases of complications after an abortion is somehow seen as using public funds *for* abortion.

      Following this logic, they’ll also be refusing emergency care to those showing up at emergency rooms after botched ‘do it yourself’ abortions now that there are no clinics in the state. Right? /sarcasm

      • fiona64


        I had some numbskulled anti-choicer over on LieActionNews tell me that these barriers to care are “for women’s safety” and not at all about preventing access.

        It’s amazing what lies people will tell themselves …