Get Real! His Religious Beliefs Say No Condoms, But I Need Them. What Do I Do?

Published in partnership with Scarleteen

sapphire12758 asks:

The guy I’m sleeping with really wants to have PIV sex with me, but he won’t wear a condom because he’s Roman Catholic. Everything else we’ve done has been amazing and I really want to do it, but I’m terrified of getting pregnant and I’ve already had a scare that I haven’t told him about. I’m on the pill now, but I know that it isn’t 100% effective. Would it be really wrong to try and get him to change his mind about condoms? I’m religious too and I’d hate to make him do anything that would go against his faith, but the idea of getting pregnant scares me so much that I have nightmares about it, and since we’re not really together I don’t know what he’d do.

Heather Corinna replies:

He doesn’t want to engage in sex with condoms (or, I assume, anything that would reduce your risks of pregnancy or sexually transmitted infections).

You don’t want to engage in sex without those things.

So, your limit, a limit you need to make clear to him, is that you won’t engage in sex without the things that reduce the risks you aren’t comfortable with: that includes condoms.

You can say something like, I respect your beliefs, wants, and limits here, but this is what I need in order to feel OK engaging in that kind of sex, just like you’re saying going without condoms is what you need. I know your limit, and now you know mine. Now let’s talk about where we both want to go from here.”

Then he gets to decide what he wants to do, and what is or isn’t in alignment with his own limits.

It may be that he feels it’s more important to him to have sex without condoms or other risk-reduction than it is to have sex with you—whether or not that’s based on his faith. I say that because Roman Catholicism doesn’t support sex (of any kind, not just intercourse) outside of marriage, sex for purposes besides procreation, or engaging in sex when someone is using the pill, so it’s hard for me to tell how much this all really is or isn’t about religious doctrine, since he’s being awfully inconsistent here.

Regardless, if he decides he’d rather hold his line about sex with no condoms than compromise with that so he can have sex with you, that’s OK (and it’s OK no matter what his desire to not use condoms is based in). He gets to feel that way, and he gets to decide to only have sex with people who don’t want to use condoms or other forms of contraception and risk reduction.

Or, it may be that he decides that his desire to have sex with you takes bigger precedence over his belief that it’s not within the bounds of his religion to engage in sex using condoms, and he may decide he’d rather use condoms than not have sex with you. He gets to do that too, if that’s how he feels and what he finds he feels best about.

(I’d also say that you should figure that someone who insists on not using condoms with a partner probably poses higher sexually transmitted infection (STI) risks. Because if they have had any other partners before, they probably did not use condoms with them. So, with someone like this, I’d say just from an STI-safety standpoint alone, going without condoms for any oral, vaginal, or anal sex is probably a bad idea. Personally, in a situation like this, I’d just be graciously saying it was time for me and someone like this not to continue to be sexual, since what I needed for emotional and physical safety obviously isn’t compatible with what they believe in and want to do. No harm, no foul, everyone is still awesome, but I’m going to just exempt myself from the whole situation and move along.)

No matter what he decides, you can both set your own lines and not make anyone do anything they’re not uncomfortable with when you’re just clear that, like they have given lines, so have you, and you want and intend to respect both of them. In other words, he’s set his, now you’re going to set yours. And so long as you both respect what the other decides, and neither of you attempts to change the other’s mind about each of your limits, it’s all good here.

So if you’re going to hold your limit with condoms, but you also understand and respect he may continue to hold his, what’s most likely is that you’ll be at an impasse. What that probably means is that sex between the two of you isn’t going to be something either one of you will choose to move forward with. Here, it sounds like what he wants and what you want just really aren’t a fit; it sounds like you two just aren’t a good choice for being partners together.

If that’s what winds up happening, that gets to be OK too. In fact, when any two (or more) people find that to engage in sex together, one of them would have to do something they really don’t want to do, or take risks they don’t want to take that scare the beejeezus out of them, and that don’t need to even be taken? Not having sex together is usually the best choice for everyone involved.

After all, it’s not like you’re the only two people in the world. He can find partners who also don’t want to use condoms, and you can find partners who also want to use them.

The world goes on when that happens. It truly keeps right on turning, even if we’re bummed out about not having a sexual relationship with someone we wanted to have one with.

Being disappointed like that sucks, but it passes, and it also usually feels a whole lot better than doing things with sex we don’t want to do and really aren’t OK with. You probably know this already just from being in the position where you don’t feel like you can tell him you had a pregnancy scare, and that’s something you had to go through alone. With a partner that was a better fit for you? You wouldn’t have had to do that—you could have been honest and gotten some emotional support you probably really wanted.

Not only does the world keep right on turning when we choose not to have sex with a partner who isn’t compatible for us in some ways, our sexual lives and the way we feel about them are usually far better for it when we are only choosing sexual partners who are truly a good fit for us. They’re usually much, much better when we don’t do sexual things, or do them in ways we really don’t want to, without the safeties we need to stay well and to feel safe and sound. When we only do them with partners where we’re both able to have sex involve the things we really want and need—where those wants and needs are at peace, not in combat.

I don’t think the fact that his belief around this is apparently religious really changes anything, nor makes this any different than if his desire not to use condoms had nothing to do with religion.

Again, it might not really have anything to do with religion, given how it sounds like he wants to do and does do things that are just as far outside that doctrine in terms of sex anyway. Even if it did, it’s not like because something is about religion, it gets to automatically trump or be held higher than someone’s boundaries or personal safety needs. Plus, I have to tell you, I’m not convinced this isn’t just someone trying to wheedle their way out of using condoms with you by using religion as an excuse, especially given the inconsistencies with his beliefs and behaviors. It’s not like he’d be the first person to do that.

But ultimately, he wants a thing that doesn’t work for you; you want a thing that sounds like it won’t work for him. So you both just put those things out there, as limits, hopefully each with care and respect for each other, and make your decisions about them accordingly, understanding that no one has to do anything they don’t want to do here, or aren’t comfortable with. And the simplest, and probably soundest, way to make sure that’s not what happens? It’s probably just to nix sex together altogether, and maybe even just both move away from this sexual relationship, so you both can seek out different partners who fit you both a whole lot better.

Here are a few links that I think will give you some extra help with some of this:

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact

Follow Heather Corinna on twitter: @Scarleteen

  • Amy

    I don’t agree with Heather Corinna here, even though she’s the bomb 99% of the time.
    I really don’t believe it’s a good idea to put a young girl, clearly under a lot of pressure by her partner, under even more pressure, and only give her “neutral” advise.

    What I can assume having interacted a lot with adolescents is that right now, she is reading Heather Corinna’s response as “everyone’s right, everyone has a choice, if you don’t give up on your sensible request for condoms he will leave you. And you know, your needs and risks are equal to his”. Well they aren’t! And he is not right!

    What this boy here is doing is sexually irresponsible. No matter what kind of religious beliefs behind his reasoning, I think it should be made clear here that having sex without a condom with a new partner is not okay, and never is. Neither is having sex without contraception, unless you both are committed to having a baby. His needs and risks are NOT equal to any girl he ends up giving an STI/ impregnating. Their risks are much greater – thus it is never okay to tell a young girl who’s facing some difficult choices that he’s a great guy, you TWO are just not compatible, ie. you are at fault as well. He’s the one who’s not compatible to have sexual relations right now, with anyone! All the girls he sleeps with are in risk of an unwanted baby and an STI, while he waltzes away, having complied with his “religious beliefs”.

    Please, at least tell the girl “you ROCK for wanting to protect yourself, never give that up!”

    • HeilMary1

      She should tell Mr. “Catholic” that priests use condoms when they bang hookers and married women.

  • dagobarbz

    Sounds like he’s using religion as an excuse to demand bareback sex. If he’s saying it to her, he could be saying it to others as well. Eww. Sharing.

  • Beatrix S.L

    The boy is a cherry-picking hypocrite. Last time I checked, premarital sex was also against Roman Catholic beliefs.

  • Miska123

    Kick him to the curb. Your body, your choice. He can indulge in pre-marital sex but can’t use a condom because he’s Catholic? The first is called fornacation, the second hyprocacy.
    Kick him to the curb.

  • disqus_I9ERiegRth

    this reply is too long. try “you are in a relationship with a liar and a hypocrite. he is manipulating and using you. get rid of him and then get tested for diseases because he probably gave you one”

  • Arakiba

    His religion also says that sex outside of marriage is bad, but he’ll ignore that little Catholic rule and just stick to the no-condom one. This woman should dump this man.

  • Susan Lowe

    Dump him, honey. If he doesn’t respect your needs in this area, he won’t respect your needs in other areas.

  • colleen2

    I hope she dumps this guy soon.

  • Jonathan Kuperberg

    Amen to everyone posting here, just upvoted the lot of you! Fornication is a MUCH worse sin than putting a condom on would be. God damn hypocrisy, and every other vice- what this hypocritical shitbag’s trying to play is something like being offered a Sunday job for five hours at $10/hr and saying: “I’m a Catholic, I don’t like working on the Sabbath because it’s against my religion… so I’ll just steal the extra $50 from an old lady instead.”

    • colleen2

      The problem isn’t the ‘fornication’ or lack of the same and we really are not interested in your notions of what is and is not ‘sin’. This is not a religious blog.

      • Jonathan Kuperberg

        Scare quotes AGAIN? Pathetic. Nothing to be scared of. BTW- this is not an atheist blog.

        • colleen2

          The quotes do not to
          indicate a direct quotation or fear, they are placed there to suggest that the expression ‘fornication’ is
          somehow inappropriate or misleading.
          This is a pro-choice blog. It is not an appropriate place to browbeat women or proselytize. now go away.

          • Jonathan Kuperberg

            The expression is not misleading. It refers to the immoral practice of engaging in illicit sex, that is without marriage. I am not browbeating any woman because I am speaking out against the MALE cafeteria Catholic with his hypocritical fornicating; it is him who is being anti-woman because the woman will have to go through the pregnancy resulting from his hypocrisy.

          • colleen2

            the expression(s) were inappropriate.

          • HeilMary1

            And what about disfigured, proudly EX-Christian spinsters like me who will never get marriage proposals because of abuse from your misogynist Christian Taliban? I’m through with suffering for your heretic psychotic tyranny.