West Virginia Sexting Law Likely to Harm Already-Victimized Girls

While I suspect most teen sexting is relatively harmless, most of us are rightly concerned about incidents in which naked pictures of teenagers get forwarded and distributed without their consent. In most cases, a girl shares a nude photo of herself with a boy (or man, in some cases) whom she trusts will behave appropriately with this vulnerable image, only to have him show it off to others, post it online, or otherwise try to shame her for it. In a couple of sad cases, the humiliated girl has even committed suicide. It’s a problem that needs fixing. Unfortunately, West Virginia’s approach—to outlaw sexting and charge those found “possessing, distributing or producing sexually inappropriate photos, videos or other media” with delinquency—is exactly the wrong way to go about this.

This law may be well-intentioned, but it will almost certainly serve mainly or even entirely to punish victims who are already enduring a public humiliation. After all, the only way that a “sext” will come to the government’s attention is if it’s being disseminated, usually without the person in the photograph’s permission. Private text messages that are kept private will, for obvious reasons, not draw legal attention.

I can confidently predict how the enforcement of this law will turn out most of the time: A girl will send a nude picture to a boy. He will forward it, publish it, and share it generally. Once it becomes known that the picture is out there, the girl, who is already suffering from a public shaming, will be charged with delinquency. The boy who originally forwarded the message may get charged, but in many or most cases, probably not. After all, it’s easier to prove that she was engaged in sexting, because of the image, than to bother to figure out who forwarded it first. They can’t charge everyone who shared the image, right? So she, the victim of this hateful behavior, will be the one punished. It’s tailor made for victim-blaming and abuse.

How do I know that’s how it will go down? Well, common sense should be good enough, but we also have actual real-world evidence. High schools have already experimented with punishing students for sexting, and the punishments often fall more heavily on the girl whose only crime was trusting too much, and not the boys who violated her trust. Jezebel reported in April about a teenage girl who sent a topless photo of herself to her male friends, and sure enough, she was the one who got expelled while the boys weren’t punished.

The American Civil Liberties Union shared a similar story from 2010 in which the girls in the sexts were charged with child pornography, even though the photos didn’t show nudity:

Only the girls who appeared in the photos were threatened with child porn charges. If the DA did in fact regard these photos as pornographic, why not file distribution charges against the boys? A clue may be found in their argument before the 3rd Circuit. In narrating the case, their attorney explained how, after the girls were photographed, “high school boys did as high school boys will do, and traded the photos among themselves.”

We have no reason to believe this law won’t be handled in a similar fashion, where girls are punished for creating sexts, but boys aren’t for sharing them. You could try to justify this by saying that the fear of legal consequences might make girls a little more cautious about who they trust with nude images of themselves, but that argument falls apart when you examine it at all. After all, the girls already know the risks of being humiliated if the image gets out there. If they didn’t already have misplaced trust in the recipients of the nude images, they wouldn’t be sending them. So adding more risks won’t likely change the calculation there.

The problem here is that adults all too frequently focus on the “sex” part of sexting, when the real issue is not sex, but misogyny and a violation of trust. It’s only natural that girls will be tempted to use digital technology to take nude photographs. Sexual experimentation is a normal part of adolescence, and human beings have used every kind of media technology throughout history to make erotic representations. It’s just what we do. The issue here is not that girls are experimenting with sex, but that so many boys think so little of girls’ humanity that they would subject girls to a massive public shaming just for the hell of it.

To be clear, most boys are not engaging in this shaming behavior. Preliminary research shows that only 11 to 12 percent of boys have shared private images with people who weren’t meant to see them. Still, that number is alarmingly high, suggesting that this kind of disrespect and misogynist belief that a woman deserves to be abused for daring be sexual is really widespread. This is the problem that needs to be dealt with. Boys need to be explicitly taught to respect girls’ privacy, and if they violate trust someone put in them to keep private images private, then they are the ones who need to be punished, not the girls.

After the Steubenville case, where boys filmed and photographed themselves raping a girl, you would think people would understand what the problem is: So many boys feel not only that it’s OK to humiliate and bully girls in this way, but that it makes them a hero in the eyes of their friends. Unfortunately, our massive cultural hang-ups about female sexuality make it hard to see this. Which is why laws like this one in West Virginia will absolutely be used to abuse already-victimized girls, while not doing anything productive to prevent the real problem, people forwarding sexual messages without permission.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact press@rhrealitycheck.org.

Follow Amanda Marcotte on twitter: @amandamarcotte

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1196615367 Tanya Nguyễn

    This law leaves me cold on a number of levels. The most obvious being some “it’s non of your damned busines what I say or who I say it to, or whom I share pictures of myself with”, but this article articulates the more real world issues at stake.

    well written!

  • http://twitter.com/FistyFisterson Fisty

    Or, now this is crazy, but they could accept personal responsibility for being the dumbass who actually believed a guy when he said he’d never show it to anyone. Seriously, we shouldn’t be making new laws for stupid shit like this. You send a nude picture of yourself out, congratulations, the internet will eventually be fapping to you.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000084339235 Shannon Slanina

    How but if the picture are taken without her consent with her phone in the hands of another. I.E. assault and or rape photos then what?

  • http://www.kizi1.org/ Kizi

    I do not see labels on the phones. Can you tell me more about it instead. thank you

    • http://twitter.com/JenGStarr Jennifer Starr

      Why would you need labels on the phones?

  • Sappho Girl

    Rape and sexual harassment laws are also enforced by a patriarchal state. Nor have the laws themselves stopped either of these practices. Are you saying we should not have laws against these as well?

    • DavidMHart

      I think the point is that we should not have laws that will predominantly be used to punish the victims of uncivil or aggressive behaviour.

      We do not criminalize people for being the victims of rape and sexual harassment, and to the extent that the legal system presents obstacles to victims to bring a case against a sex offender, that’s a problem with the way the legal system works, which needs to be addressed, not a problem with the principle of punishing the perpetrators of sex attacks.

      This law looks likely to be used as a watered-down version of the law that is actually applied in some countries, whereby the victim of a rape is held legally responsible and subjected to punishment.

      If we are genuinely worried about the wellbeing of girls naive enough to trust a teenage boy with a naked photo of herself, then it would be simple enough to criminalise the forwarding of such a photo provided that one was not the person pictured in it.

  • Lia

    If they are sharing someone’s photos without permission, isn’t there a way to get them for copyright infringement or something?