North Carolina Lawmakers Propose Employer Veto on Birth Control Coverage


This year, the North Carolina legislature has proposed multiple abortion restrictions, a bill that could close many clinics, another that will force students to learn inaccurate medical information to frighten them out of seeking an abortion, and yet another that could make it impossible for many teens to access reproductive health care like birth control, pregnancy testing, and diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections. Now, the state house is preparing to debate HB 730, a “conscience clause” bill that would allow health-care practitioners to opt out of anything that could be characterized as “assisting” in an abortion, and also would offer employers the option of cutting off their employees’ birth control coverage in the company insurance plan if the employer finds contraception “immoral.”

The bill, which was first filed in April, reads:

As used in this subsection, the term “religious employer” includes any employer, including, but not limited to, a corporation, LLC, partnership, or sole proprietorship, whether on a for profit or nonprofit basis, that has a religious, moral, or ethical objection to arranging for, paying for, facilitating, or providing health benefits plan coverage for contraceptive drugs or methods, including, but not limited to, any and all contraceptive drugs and methods approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration.

The language is similar to that of other state bills aimed at restricting birth control access that have cropped up since the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate went into effect last August. Since then, dozens of non-profit and for-profit groups have sued to be excluded from the mandate, and those actions have been encouraged by conservative legal and anti-choice advocacy groups icluding the Thomas More Society to the Susan B. Anthony List.

The theme of North Carolina’s legislative session may be “Who is allowed to consent to their own medical care?” Just as teens may potentially be cut off from accessing birth control without parental consent, women are being subjected to contraception restrictions unless they get permission from their employers.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Follow Robin Marty on Twitter: @robinmarty

To schedule an interview with Robin Marty please contact Communications Director Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • http://www.facebook.com/julia.howell.73 Julia Howell

    Allowing the moral concerns of an employer to do an end run around the law is a slippery slope coated with baby oil.

    So what next? Your employer has a moral objection to single women who live without their parents?

    How about a moral concern about mixing of the races?

    What is an employer feels it’s immoral to have more than 2 children and fires anyone who is having or planning for a third?

    Moral objection to divorce? Fire anyone who is getting a divorce?

    Incorperating a company allows protections, now coparations want more special privilages with their protections.

  • colleen2

    Why should employers even have the right to knowledge about an employee’s private medical decisions and records? Why should employers have more power over a woman’s medical decisions than a family member? Why is the decision to use effective contraception any of an employer’s business? Why should an employer have the right to force his religious beliefs down the throats of his female employees?
    OTOH, it’s good to see that the historical pissing contest between North and South Carolina to see who can produce the most repulsive cesspool. And to think that I thought it ended with the deaths of Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms. Now South Carolina can return Mark Sanford to Congress to lecture us on family values one week and the next week North Carolina can treat all fertile women in the state like breeding livestock with no privacy or conscience rights at all and call that result “moral”. Fuck them.

    • HeilMary1

      Reporters should grill Sanford and the mistress on what kind of birth control they use to prevent out-of-wedlock pregnancies.