Why Men Should Be Taught Not to Rape—And What Rape Is


VIDEO: Zerlina Maxwell on Hannity: Giving Every Woman A Gun is Not Rape Prevention

Political analyst Zerlina Maxwell on Hannity talking about gun violence and rape prevention. Giving every woman a gun is not going to solve problem of rape. Teaching men about consent and how to respect women is where any conversation about prevention should begin.

Last week, Democratic strategist, writer, and rape survivor Zerlina Maxwell went on The Sean Hannity Show and argued that men and boys should be trained not to rape. Maxwell was viciously attacked by conservatives following her appearance. But if there’s any problem with Maxwell’s argument, it’s not that it went too far—it’s that it could have gone even further.

“I don’t think we should be telling women anything. I think we should be telling men not to rape women and start the conversation there for prevention,” Maxwell said on Hannity’s show. “You’re talking about it as if there’s some faceless, nameless criminal, when a lot of times it’s someone that you know and trust.”

“Women need to know that these situations arise,” responded Hannity, apparently unaware that women know all too well that rape is a constantly looming threat. It affects our decisions on a daily basis: when and where to jog, when to walk with our keys in between our knuckles, and when to hop out of a cab a block from home if the driver gives us the creeps.

Maxwell was on the show to address the newest twist in the ever-misinformed public conversation about rape. The subject was the role of firearms in rape prevention on college campuses—a hot topic since the Colorado state legislature has been wrestling with HB 1226, a proposed bill that would ban concealed weapons on campus. (The sponsor spiked the bill after the hubbub surrounding Maxwell’s appearance.)

Maxwell argued that, while problematic on a several levels, the argument that women can prevent rape by packing heat is primarily a failure because it is not rooted in the reality of campus rape.

“I want women to be able to protect themselves, yes, but I want women to not be in this situation,” said Maxwell.

“Knowing there are evil people, I want women protected, and they’ve got to protect themselves,” responded Hannity.

Maxwell doubled down: “Tell men not to rape.”

Glenn Beck’s The Blaze called her argument “bizarre.” But it’s disingenuous to suggest that women must choose between being armed or being raped. Saying that a woman should be able to pack heat for self-protection is one thing. But self-defense is not the same thing as rape prevention—and carrying a gun certainly doesn’t guarantee defense against rape.

“If firearms are the answer, then the military would be the safest place for women,” said Maxwell. “And it’s not.”

For her audacity, Maxwell received a torrent of abusive tweets. These Twitter users said she should be gang-raped and that her throat should be slit. They called her a “nigger.” Many others simply insisted on perpetuating a false, twisted representation of her argument: Zerlina Maxwell believes women should be raped instead of using a gun on a rapist.

So it’s come to this: We now must add carrying a gun to our victim-blaming checklist. “She wasn’t carrying a pistol; she must’ve wanted it.”

As if that list wasn’t already long enough.

Maxwell is right, of course. The only problem with her argument is that it didn’t go far enough. For men and boys to be taught not to rape, they have to first learn what rape is.

College women are more likely to be raped than their unenrolled counterparts, and the vast majority of college rapists are trusted acquaintances of the victim, not a man in a ski mask hiding in the bushes wielding a knife or a gun.

Freshmen are more likely to be raped than other students. College rape most often takes place in the victim’s home and is likely to be preceded by consensual kissing. It is almost never reported; fewer than 5 percent of rapes and attempted rapes on college campuses are reported to law enforcement officials, according the National College Women Sexual Victimization (NCWSV) study conducted by the National Institute of Justice.

When the NCWSV study asked rape survivors why they didn’t call the police, “the common answers included that the incident was not serious enough to report and that it was not clear that a crime was committed.”

The preferred weapon of choice in a typical campus rape is confusion. “Date rape” sounds like something that occurs after a candlelit dinner with a cracked crème brulee. In reality, it’s more like “passive-aggressive rape”; kissing precedes the attack, and orchestrated pleasantries may follow. The words coming out of the rapist’s mouth may sound like sex, while his physical actions feel like rape. Women are often left wondering if they could have been raped by such a “nice guy,” and they often conclude, at least in the short-term (the study only addressed incidents that took place in the previous six months), that they weren’t.

The study concludes that many women don’t characterize their sexual victimizations as crimes for a few main reasons: “not clearly understanding the legal definition of rape, or not wanting to define someone they know who victimized them as a rapist, or because they blame themselves for their sexual assault.”

So a survivor may answer yes to a behavior-specific screening question such as, “Has anyone made you have sexual intercourse by using force or threatening to harm you or someone close to you?” but answer no to, “Were you raped?”

The concept of grooming, or manufacturing emotional and psychological confusion in a victim, is easily understood when it comes to child victims of sexual abuse. But that understanding does not yet extend to the romantic realm, though the processes sound similar. We still have a hard time recognizing that a “nice” college guy who makes a woman pancakes after a disturbing and confusing sexual episode the previous night is a rapist—and the research shows he’s counting on it.

Psychologist David Lisak, a forensic consultant, leading expert on non-stranger rape, and rape survivor, has conducted groundbreaking research on “undetected rapists” (as in, “nice-guy” rapists who routinely get away with acquaintance rape). He found that college men are just as confused as women; they answer yes to having committed behaviors graphically describing rape, yet no to being a rapist.

“They shared the very widespread belief that rapists were knife-wielding men in ski masks who attacked strangers; since they did not fit that description, they were not rapists and their behavior was not rape,” wrote Lisak.

Can education campaigns targeting men and boys prevent all rape? Of course not. Flagrant criminals interested in violently attacking strangers will only be stopped the old-fashioned way: with arrest, injury, or death.

But we can reduce instances of the most common type of college rape by teaching men and women, boys and girls, what rape actually is. We can help prevent rapes perpetuated by boys and men who are totally OK with being jerks about getting laid, but not necessarily fine with being rapists—or, at the very least, not OK with winding up behind bars.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with contact director of communications Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

Follow Tara Murtha on twitter: @taramurtha

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=620465035 facebook-620465035

    Zerlina Maxwell’s article, expanding on what she said on Fox News, makes the same point re consent:
    http://www.ebony.com/news-views/5-ways-we-can-teach-men-not-to-rape-456#axzz2NLjh6Srl

    This is a good time to stand by Zerlina Maxwell, not to argue that she “doesn’t go far enough” (when, in fact, she already made the same point you’re making).

    • http://www.facebook.com/juliet.wayne Juliet Hope Wayne

      I don’t see this writer arguing against Zerlina Maxwell at all. She IS standing by her. This is a good time to stand by the people standing by Zerlina Maxwell.

  • AMH

    Oh no! Let’s not tear down Maxwell – she was hardly allowed to speak in this video, and she does make the same point about education in her writing. We really need to stand together on this, rather than engage in one-up-womanship.

    • http://www.facebook.com/juliet.wayne Juliet Hope Wayne

      did we all read the same article???? “One up woman-ship?” Are you serious? This article is building Zerlina Maxwell’s argument when the right is trying to tear it down in the most absurd ways possible.

  • http://twitter.com/lifepostepic Cade DeBois

    I’m not sure why people are reading an attack on Maxwell into this article, but I agree with the author. Even in the article provided by another commenter, I find it frustrating that whenever we try to talk about teaching boys and men what rape is and that THEY can be rapists if they don’t understand what rape it, we suddenly run beind arguments about “consent”. It’s like we are scared to tell men and boys that, hey, you could do a truly horrible thing that hurts another person if you don’t get this straight in your head. And that’s exactly what I think they need to hear because they are hearing lots of other things about rape, sex and women that do anything but make the line between consensual sex and rape clear for them

    Yes, consent in a big part of it, but as Murtha points out here, the way we are *groomed* about sex and rape creates confusion and doubt in many people’s minds, even to where you may have sex forced onto you without your consent but you’re still unsure if you should call it rape. This issue isn’t quite covered in the idea of “consent education” that Maxwell advocates. In fact, I think the notion that consent is something easy to understand is a bit naive precisely from how we are cultured in our sexual attitudes. It isn’t so simple as two people getting intimate and then one deciding it needs to stop. Both individuals are bringing cultural baggage into that moment that may very easily clutter one or the other’s ability to ask for, to give or to refuse consent. We need to address the ways our culture confuses us whenever we talk about rape, like Murtha does here, in order to make it clear to people what rape is.

    • sophie

      Excellent comment!

  • sheba4567@aol.com

    why are you chastizing MsMaxwell

  • Lavender

    Murtha is 100% right. We as a society need to clarify and reiterate our boundaries – both legally and culturally – around rape. If women are sometimes confused about whether to call rape what it is, we can’t expect all men to be clear on it either. I know it seems black and white to people like Hannity who boil it down to people being “evil”, but a rudimentary understanding of psychology dictates that it’s much easier to do something immoral or harmful when we have a lack of appreciation for what it is exactly that we’re doing, how it truly affects others and why it’s wrong. When you allow a grey area to grow around an issue such as this one, as we have done, you’re creating opportunities for people to make excuses (consciously or subconsciously) for taking advantage of situations when they’re not exactly thinking clearly. Fundamental change can only occur when all those involved and affected are part of the solution.

  • Pingback: Why Zerlina Maxwell Is Almost Right About Teaching Men Not to Rape | BirchIndigo

  • kate de braose

    It’s the same old story. People don’t believe anyone they know could be victims of rape so when some other poor woman is raped, they believe there must be something wrong with HER.
    Isn’t it obvious that it’s just easier (less frightening) to blame the victim than some guy who could be a danger to you and yours?
    Too bad that their decision to believe there is no danger of rape for an upright female is the most futile and dangerous defence of rapists anyone could choose.

  • http://twitter.com/donnadara Ayinde Flores

    I’m not understanding why people refuse to see the attack on Zerlina Maxwell. The title says that she’s almost right. That is certainly not a ringing endorsement. I have to wonder if this is one of those situations where race and gender meet and white women are unable or unwilling to recognize a real offense.

    • http://www.facebook.com/singdammit Tamara Williams Van Horn

      Yes.

      Signed, a Black feminist RH scholar fed up with lazy journalism. #HeadlineIsViolent

  • BlueTigress

    Girls need to learn that when they’re at the “wait, I don’t want this” point to kick the guy physically out of bed, then leave, if you’re at his place. If he’s at your place, you keep kicking until he leaves.
    I did it, and at the time I was 5’2″ and 115 pounds. He never spoke to me again and there were no repercussions. I think I scared him.

    • Geoff Merritt

      Boys need to learn that if the girl is at the “wait, I don’t want this point” is to accept what she is saying and don’t rape her.

  • http://www.facebook.com/lydaness Lyda Ness

    The inane notion that guns will prevent rape highlights the miconceptions about rape. Guns wont prevent rape because the majority of rapes are not SVU strangers breaking into your house but a man you know where a gun will do not use. Regardless, guns are more likely going to beu sed against you in a situation like this. Stupid stupid stupid.

  • http://twitter.com/Pisthetaerus Aggh

    Why should only men be taught not to rape?

    Also, I don’t know about others, but in high school and middle school we were taught about what rape is.