Utah Legislator Willing to Give Up “Gender-Based Abortion” Ban, But Wants Increased “Information Collection”


State Senator Margaret Dayton has been working since the summer on her bill that would ban so-called gender-selection abortion in the state of Utah. Now, as the session is finally beginning, she’s decided that the ban may not be necessary at all.

However, just because she is giving up on her ban doesn’t mean she’s just going to leave everything in the state as it is. Instead, she will propose as bill that will provide more tracking of abortions, such as who is receiving them, how many are done, and at what gestational age. 

Via the Daily Herald:

“I had requests from several legislators that we get all the data and keep it in state and then we will address other issues,” Dayton explained.

Dayton said the data is collected on a federal level but there are concerns that the reports will not produce the numbers Utah is seeking. She went on to explain that this bill will allow the state to gather the numbers to help policymakers when creating abortion legislation.

“Right now the focus is on the information,” she said.

Sen. Dayton has amended SB 60 to require “the race and ethnicity of the women on whom the abortions were performed.” Perhaps a race-based abortion ban is still on her radar?

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Follow Robin Marty on twitter: @robinmarty

  • http://www.facebook.com/marna.foss Marna Foss

    It’s a shame her mother did not consider one….or maybe she did but was unable to have one. Regardless, we have a whole generation of religious fanatics obsessed with the female anatomy….if only they went past an eighth grade education, perhaps they would comprehend.

  • Went Rogue

    Well, the data collection isn’t free, but “race and ethnicity” are both reported for every single abortion provided in the state of Minnesota (along with city and county of residence, level of education attained, and reason for seeking abortion), and have been since 1998 when the law passed with broad bi-partisan support. Certainly this kind of questioning and targeting of providers is not limited to red states.