Michigan Legislators Reintroduce Forced Ultrasound Bill


Tuesday, anti-choice Michigan legislators re-introduced a piece of legislation I wrote about last session, that will force all women seeking safe abortion care to undergo an ultrasound with the most technologically-advanced imaging equipment available, a minimum of two hours prior to obtaining an abortion.

At Talking Points Memo, Sahil Kapur referred to the bill as one that would mandate transvaginal ultrasounds, similar to bills that were defeated in Virginia and Alabama last year. But Michigan’s HB 4187 goes beyond mandating transvaginal ultrasound. It’s true that the bill would mandate transvaginal ultrasound in a de-facto sense in very early pregnancy, when the vast majority of abortions are performed, as transvaginal ultrasound would be the most visually-accurate technology available at that point. But at later stages in pregnancy, it’s likely that the advanced “3D’ ultrasound equipment would be required, assuming that a clinic had such equipment on-site. Additionally, while the bill claims to be giving women the “option” of viewing the ultrasound images, it also mandates that the monitors be turned in the woman’s direction, so that the only way she can exercise her choice to not view the images is by closing her eyes.

As I said of this legislation last year, this is about more than just the physical violation of a woman’s body with a transvaginal ultrasound wand. It is also about the mental and emotional violation of forcing women to view the most visually-detailed ultrasound images possible, in what is clearly an attempt to cause guilt and shame.

Forced ultrasounds are especially excessive considering that Michigan’s “informed consent” law already mandates that women receive information detailing their current stage of embryonic/fetal development 24-hours in advance of receiving an abortion.

HB 4187 is now awaiting a recommendation from the House Committee on Health Policy, where Republicans outnumber Democrats 11 to 6.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with Angi Becker Stevens please contact Communications Director Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • Lori

    If a woman has an abortion, the use of the probe is no more invasive than the abortion process itself, and can prevent the woman from having to deal with the terrible guilt and shame afterwards, that she may live for the rest of her life, from causing the death of a perfectly healthy baby.