• crowepps

    “Garrett said the bill would make Virginia law more consistent with the federal Hyde Amendment”…

    I did not know the Hyde Amendment excluded futile pregnancies.  Looks to me like the Hyde Amendment needs to be changed.

     

  • amy-phillips-bursch

    There’s no other way to put it. I can’t imagine anything worse than being forced by the state to carry a nonviable fetus to term. I expect, too, that if the fetus somehow survives, Virginia will pick up the bill for a lifetime of advanced medical care, right? ARGH.

Mobile Theme