Texas’ Conservative Legislative Leader Says Even He Doesn’t Share Perry’s Anti-Choice Priorities


Enveloped in the pink, womb-like glow of a Source For Women crisis pregnancy center in Houston, Texas Governor Rick Perry spoke this week about his goal to “to make abortion at any stage a thing of the past,” supporting a ban on abortions after 20 weeks in the state. His enthusiasm has been shared by Texas Right To Life, which is currently shopping around a bill on the ban, though it’s yet to find official sponsorship in the legislature. Perry has made his intentions clear: he wants abortion to be illegal. Period.

“While Roe vs. Wade prevents us from taking that step, it does allow us, the states, to do some things to protect life if they can show there is a compelling state interest. I don’t think there is any issue that better fits the definition of compelling state interest than preventing the suffering of our state’s unborn.”

But Texas’ legislative leadership has a different take on what constitutes a “compelling state interest” for legislators. Texas House Speaker Joe Straus said Wednesday that he’s more concerned about “serious issues,” and that he doesn’t see how an abortion bill “directly affects the agenda of education and transportation and water resources and budget transparency and manufacturing jobs.” He continued, via the Texas Tribune:

“… there are thousands of bills that will be filed as there always are and it sounds like that may be one of them. But the top of the agenda for me will be education, resources, infrastructure, the things that will help Texans cope with the tremendous growth we’re seeing in this state.”

A number of unsuccessful attempts have been made to “oust Straus” from his position as speaker; he’s unpopular with far-right Republicans and Tea Partiers, but so far has been able to hold on to his title since taking it on in 2009, and it’s unlikely he’ll be unseated in 2013.

If even the voice of the Texas Legislature thinks Perry’s got mixed-up priorities in championing a 20-week ban, what are the real chances of its success in the lege? Especially when science and common sense doesn’t lend itself to extreme legislation like this?

Much of the rhetoric surrounding a 20-week ban centers on the issue of fetal pain despite the fact that no credible, objective medical evidence supports its existence before the third trimester. And only a small percentage of abortions happen at 20+ weeks, the vast majority for a variety of systemic, sad, and important reasons that do not generally, as anti-choice legislators seem to believe, include “Ignorant, heartless floozies changing their mind because today ends in ‘y.’”

As NARAL Pro-Choice Texas executive director Heather Busby told RH Reality Check:

“The circumstances are usually something tragic. There are any number of fetal anomalies, health problems that come up that could be life threatening. It’s impossible for any lawmaker to contemplate every exception that could be needed.”

RH Reality Check contacted Gov. Perry’s office to find out whether he supported any exceptions to a 20-week abortion ban, such as those for rape, incest or the life of the pregnant person, but his office demurred, saying only that “those details will be worked out by the Legislature.”

It’s appropriate, then, that Perry would lend his support for this yet-to-be-filed bill at the Source for Women, the crisis pregnancy center that he called the “future” of the Texas Women’s Health Program … despite the fact that it provides no medical care whatsoever. Why get into silly things like details that affect the lives of living, breathing Texans when political pandering looks so much better?

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Follow Andrea Grimes on twitter: @andreagrimes

  • divine-oubliette

    A ban on ‘late’ term aboritons would have left my sister with a damaged baby, she’s in college nad experiements with loads of drugs while unknowing was pregnant – drugs that can cause massive deformities and cause the brain to devlop inadaquately (this is putting it mildly). She did heavy damage to that pregnancy unknowingly, in addition to this she has irrelgualr period and didn’t find out she was pregnant until quickening (20 weeks), her pegnnacy was terminated to spare it an agonizingly unbearable life, to spare her from the guilt of having to raise a chidl she had damaged beyonf belief, she also needs to finsih college and get away from the abusive man who impregnanted her. I cringe when I think of the situation she and it would be in now if she hadn’t been able to terminate said pregnancy. It would have been beyong the pale to have to go out of state to termiante the pregnancy but we would have if it had been necessary.

     

    Vote Perry out of office lady Texans! Vote his opinions out of our uterus’.