“Abortion Doesn’t Unrape You:” Following Election Disaster, Anti-Choice Activists Look to Re-frame Discussion of Rape


Published in partnership with The American Independent.

After two GOP Senate candidates saw their campaigns implode when they made controversial comments about abortion and rape, Republicans like Sen. John McCain have been asking their party to just shut up about abortion.

But anti-choice movement leaders disagree. Faced with polls saying that eight in 10 Americans think abortion should be legal when a pregnancy results from rape, these activists are actually pushing for more public discussion of the issue. It’s part of a long-term campaign to try to change Americans’ minds and to bring the country closer to banning abortion in nearly all cases.

One part of the plan is to train politicians how to answer difficult questions about the issue while also attacking pro-choice politicians. Another is to emphasize the humanity of the rape survivor and her unborn baby.

On a webcast two days after the election, Billy Valentine—the policy director of the Susan B. Anthony List, which supports anti-choice rights candidates—lauded failed Senate candidates Todd Akin (who said, “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down”) and Richard Mourdock (who said that “even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen”) as being “courageous.”

“What Todd Akin and what Richard Mourdock said, what they meant was not wrong,” Valentine said. “In fact, they were taking a very courageous stand. But it’s how they said it. So one thing we’re going to be working on is making sure that candidates the pro-life movement gets behind are well-versed in our messaging and know how to answer the tough abortion questions.”

A day earlier, SBA List President Marjorie Dannenfelser made a similar point during a speech in Washington, D.C.

“We’re going to relook at how we endorse and train candidates,” Dannenfelser said. “From now on they will not be sent in the field with our support without knowing how to actually discuss the issue with compassion and love and to exploit the other candidate’s extremes.”

Part of the group’s strategy is to recruit more women candidates. The SBA List has celebrated Nebraska Republican Deb Fischer’s election to the Senate, which, says Valentine, makes her one of two pro-life female senators. “It was clear with some of the messaging problems we had on our end that had we had more women candidates, we wouldn’t have those problems,” he said.

Another group that has been particularly vocal about the rape exception issue is Students for Life of America, which was founded in the late 1970s for the purpose of training high school and college students to engage in anti-choice activism and advocacy.

One of the things SFLA currently does is sell postcards that “explore rape and incest arguments for the unborn” for anti-choice advocates to distribute. “Can you tell which child has a criminal father?” the cards read. “Should a child die for his or her father’s crimes?”

A couple of weeks after Akin’s “legitimate rape” comment went viral, SFLA President Kristan Hawkins wrote a blog post explaining why her anti-choice stance has evolved to opposing abortions in all circumstances, even in “those most awful of circumstances, rape and incest.”

“As pro-lifers, we believe that all human life should be treated with dignity and respect, no matter what your parentage may be,” she writes. “If my father goes out today and commits an act of mass murder, does that justify someone killing me? If the mother, a victim or rape, chooses to carry her child through her pregnancy and then decides at age 2 that the child reminds her too much of the rapist, should she be then allowed to kill the toddler?”

Personal testimonials

On Nov. 15, SFLA sponsored a rape-focused panel discussion at the University of St. Thomas in Houston. The discussion, which was broadcast online, featured Rebekah Berg, a rape survivor. Berg said that after briefly considering abortion, she decided to parent her child who was conceived as a result of the rape. The panel also included Ryan Bomberger, an anti-choice activist conceived in rape and placed for adoption. Berg gave a tearful testimony about how her son helped her heal from the trauma of being raped. Bomberger argued that abortion does not help rape survivors.

“Abortion doesn’t unrape you,” said Bomberger, who co-founded the Radiance Foundation, a marketing nonprofit that creates ad campaigns criticizing abortion. Some of the group’s billboards and videos, which are displayed on TooManyAborted.com, suggest that Planned Parenthood targets African-Americans for abortion, with messages like “The #1 killer of black Americans is Planned Parenthood and the abortuaries that target us” and “Stop Planned Parenthood End the Genocide.”

Bomberger often speaks at anti-choice conferences about his birth mother undergoing a traumatic pregnancy and allowing him to be adopted into a happy family with 15 kids, as he did last week, at a press briefing held by anti-choice movement leaders in Washington, D.C., ahead of the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade next month.

After the briefing, Bomberger told me the anti-choice movement should be using people’s personal stories when addressing the rape exception issue.

Okay, but should women have the option to have an abortion if they have been raped? I asked.

“See the problem is that’s not really the issue, though,” he told me. “The issue really is that 99 percent of all abortions have nothing to do with this act of violence, with rape, incest, or the physical endangerment of the mother. So it allows too often, I think, politicians like Mourdock and Akin to be taken off track and away from the reality. The reality is we have 1.21 million abortions, and 99 percent plus have nothing to do with the act of rape.

“I’m always called a rapist’s child,” he added. “Well, I’m also the child of my mother, and many women believe that that child has been their only healing grace, their only redemption. So I think any time we talk about this issue, we have to talk more about what happens beyond the act of rape.”

This type of personal appeal was also employed last year, with the “Rape Victim’s Child Tour,” an event sponsored by a national group pushing Mississippi’s failed “personhood” amendment, which would have outlawed abortion by defining a fertilized egg as a person.

While abortion-rights groups seek to expose lawmakers and candidates who oppose abortion even in the case of rape and incest, anti-choice advocacy groups are trying to figure out how to sell the argument that abortion should be banned. 

But some, like Teresa Collett, a law professor at the University of St. Thomas at Minneapolis, thinks most Americans are not ready to ban abortion without rape exceptions.

And public opinion polling tends to agree with her.

In late August, shortly after Akin’s comments, a nationwide poll produced by CNN and ORC International found that 83 percent of Americans polled said abortion should be legal “when the pregnancy was caused by rape or incest.” Periodic polling from Gallup since 1996 has found that between 75 and 78 percent of Americans say abortion should be legal in the case of rape or incest. 

Collett spoke at a recent anti-Roe lecture at Harvard University that was co-sponsored by Law Students for Life, an affiliate of SFLA. She suggested that most women who become pregnant through rape do not choose abortion. She cited a study published in the late 1970s, often promoted by the anti-choice community, “that found that 75 to 85 percent of those choose against abortion.”

However, a longitudinal survey published in 1996 in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology—which estimated that more than 32,000 pregnancies result from rape annually—found that about 50 percent of pregnant rape victims chose abortions, 32 percent opted to keep the baby, six percent opted for adoption, and 12 percent miscarried. Overall, 32 percent of the rape victims did not discover they were pregnant until the second trimester.

In her talk, Collett explained why the majority of Americans believe abortion is acceptable in the case of non-consensual sex. As an example, she brought up South Dakota’s recent attempts to ban abortion, beginning in 2006, when the state legislature passed a bill that banned all abortions except those to save the life of the mother. That law was overturned by a referendum.

“At the time that Roe versus Wade was decided, though, many abortion bans contained a rape exception,” Collett said. “And Roe struck that down. That certainly would be a law that I believe, were we to try to pass a ban, politically, as they did in South Dakota, a majority of Americans would require that there be an exception for victims of rape, and yet that would affect only 2 percent of the abortions in this country. Only 2 percent.”

She went on to say that many Americans who are against abortion believe in the rape exception because “they have an innate jurisprudential sense that law is about requiring people to live up to their duties more than it is about affirming people’s rights.

“And so they believe that when women have consensually engaged in sexual intercourse, the natural consequence is, on occasion, pregnancy, and there is no injustice in forbidding them in terminating that pregnancy. But where a woman has not consensually engaged in the activity that we know can result in pregnancy, that we ought to at least allow her some window of opportunity.”

“Not arguing for it,” she added. “I’m trying to explain why so many of our fellow citizens, who even self-identify as pro-life, think the rape cases are different, think the responsibility of people who did not even engage in the activity they know could be procreative should be excused for some brief period of time. Although even among those who would support a rape exception, I question whether they would accept it after the fourth or fifth month. There’s some sort of idea that you’ve waited long enough, you’ve made your decision.”

After the lecture, one audience member asked a question apparently related to rape exceptions.

“No, I think there will always be a rape exception,” Collett responded.

“I think that is likely, just politically,” agreed Alliance Defending Freedom attorney Steven Aden.

“I think that’s sad,” Collett added, “but we saw in South Dakota… it was unsuccessful.”

“As you saw Professor Collett’s stat that most women who are subjected to rape decide to keep the baby,” Aden said. “And those babies provide joy and fulfillment to other couples. But until there’s a place in the heart in this society for every person, even those conceived in horrible, indefensible circumstances, I think that politically perhaps there always will be.”

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Follow Sofia Resnick on Twitter: @SofiaResnick

To schedule an interview with Sofia Resnick please contact Communications Director Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • jennifer-starr

    “Well, I’m also the child of my mother, and many women believe that that child has been their only healing grace, their only redemption.”

    Why do these people seem to  think that a rape victim needs redemption?? She hasn’t done anything wrong. 

  • jennifer-starr

    “As you saw Professor Collett’s stat that most women who are subjected to rape decide to keep the baby,” Aden said. 

    Why do these people like Aden seem to not comprehend the idea of ‘personal choice’?  It seems to utterly escape them.  Just because some women make the CHOICE to keep their baby and either raise it or give it up for adoption does not make it the right decision for every woman. And it certainly does not mean that a woman should be forced into that decision. 

  • colleen

    Professor Collett needs to get a clue. Most rapes aren’t reported and most pregnancies due to rape aren’t reported either. I wish the right would explain why they think rapists make such great fathers and husbands. They raise their sons to have no sense of personal responsibility or self control and they raise their sons to feel contempt towards women and express that contempt as an expression of what serves Republicans for masculinity. I suppose they believe that rape is the only way they’re going to have grandchildren.

  • crowepps

    “If the mother, a victim of rape, chooses to carry her child through her pregnancy and then decides at age 2 that the child reminds her too much of the rapist, should she be then allowed to kill the toddler?”

    (Sarcasm)  Oh, sure because the mother killing the child at age two is *exactly* the same as a rape victim taking the Morning After Pill so that she never gets pregnant in the first place.

  • freetobe

    “Training them to show compassion”? Excuse me but what person in their right mind will not see through this farce? You cannot FAKE compassion and these people have anything but compassion for anything ! Newsflash: Your actions have spoken volumes to all of us and you on the forced birth side only shows us greed and self interest. Unlike these people we live in reality not a fake heaven like universe full of happy little trees that pray to a God they don’t even understand with a group of humans that created cults for human power, NOT Jesus.

    I suggest you at least TRY to see reality for what it is and face your own fears head on and leave the rest of us alone to decide what to do with our own lives. You won’t pay to support a woman or her children after they are born so you have no right to say a damn word!

    Oh and by the way pro-life is so far from the truth for most of you. To be pro-life and not a major HYPOCRITE you have to walk all the walks and “train ” your men to learn personal responsibility and learn to control their temper. No women wants her children being raised with a psycho!

    To make things fair no women who is violent should have children  around either. We will never be a sane society until there is ying and yang BALANCE of feminine and masculine. Right now the world is anything but balanced,fair or equal.

  • jennifer-starr

    It is never compassionate to force a woman to carry a pregnancy against her will–never. In fact, it is sickening. 

  • baberaham-lincoln

    NEITHER DOES BEING FORCED TO HAVE YOUR RAPIST’S BABY AGAINST YOUR WILL, FOR TOOT’S SAKE!

  • jennifer-starr

    Isn’t there some way to permanently stop these spammers?  They’re vandalizing web pages with fashions and shoes that no one wants anyway.

  • julanar

    How is telling the TOTAL LIE that women can’t get pregnant from rape “not wrong” or “courageous?” Saying something that no one else has the “courage” to say because it’s insensitive, stupid, or just plain WRONG (or all three) is not courageous. There’s a big difference between being courageous and being a jerk.

  • allotlymisy

    Its so nice to meet you guys here.I’m Jason from

    Just found this forum http://www.rhrealitycheck.org is amazing,learned a lot from the members here already.

    Its my first post on this great forum,if the “/article/2012/12/13/abortion-doesn%E2%80%99t-unrape-you-following-election-disaster-anti-abortion-activists-l” here is not the right place,pls remove it to the right board.:)

    I am a newbie to this forum. I have been visiting this forum for few months and have found some really helpful stuff here. This is undoubtedly one of the best forums around so I have now joined this forum and I hope that I will learn plenty of new things and have a great time at this wonderful platform.

    I spent 6 hours learning on this forum this two days, I think, I shall stay here for a long time!

  • jennifer-starr

    Oh for heaven’s sake. I don’t wish to complain, but my relevant comments have been stuck in moderation for over a week now without being posted and this spam still manages to make it through? *grumble grumble* :(

  • fiona-carmody

    Hi Jennifer,

    We get a very heavy load of spam every day and must manually go through the filter to pick out what is and isn’t spam. We understand your frustration and we are working on putting your comments out, but there is some back-up due to the holiday break.

    We will get them up as soon as possible, and we apologize for the delay. Please note that this filtering system is temporary.

    Thanks for your contact,

     

    Fiona

  • fiona-carmody

    They were not in the spam filter. If they are not published yet, it is not because they are filtered. Let us know, thanks.