Florida Supreme Court Battle Could Set Dangerous Political Precedent

When it works, our judiciary system is the final gatekeeper between citizens and state power run amok. And while the judicial branch has had its own history of scandal and political patronage, its largely stayed out of partisan electoral politics. But now that’s all changing.

The latest evidence of the blurring line between partisan electoral politics and our courts comes courtesy of Florida where conservatives in the state are making a play for the state’s high court.

As the Orlando Sentinel first reported, the state Republican party voted to oppose the retention of Supreme Court Justices Fred Lewis, Barbara Pariente and Peggy Quince. All three were appointed by Democratic former Governor Lawton Chiles and all three ruled in 2010 to remove from Florida’s ballot a non-binding amendment that would have allowed Floridians to refuse to buy mandatory health insurance in opposition to Obamacare.

In Florida, judges are appointed by the governor then face a “merit retention” vote every six years. Florida hasn’t removed a justice from the court in 40 years since adopting this system of judicial appointment. The decision to remove a sitting justice is normally based on misconduct or incompetence. But here it’s being driven on partisan disagreement.

Normally judicial elections are low-campaigning, low-money affairs, but not any more.  A conservative group founded by the Koch brothers is the funding the Florida campaign against the justices, just like they did in Iowa during the 2010 election. There, conservatives backed by the Koch brothers launched a campaign against three justices who ruled in favor of same sex marriage in the state. A fourth Iowa justice who also ruled in favor of same sex marriage is being targeted this election.

Should conservatives succeed in ousting these judges in Florida the results would be significant and long-lasting. Most immediately, Gov. Rick Scott would have the opportunity to appoint three justices to the seven justice bench and with it drive the court even harder to the right. Long-term the success of these kinds of campaigns present serious problems for our judiciary. In Iowa outside groups like those funded by the Koch brothers spent almost $700,000 to unseat those three justices. In 2010 a little more than $12 million was spent nationally on TV ad time in state supreme court elections. That means that judges now have to raise funds, an activity that can call into question impartiality, a key component of judicial ethics.

The more our judicial candidates are forced to campaign, the more beholden they will be to their political donors, or at least that will be the unavoidable conclusion many in the public will draw. And when the public loses faith in the impartiality of the judiciary then the system of checks and balances really does crumble away.

Judicial appointments have always existed in tension with partisan politics; the judicial branch is supposed to be non-partisan but it is unavoidable that governors and presidents appoint justices in line with their political beliefs in addition to the particular skill and experience of the candidate. But there’s a difference between our judges existing as creatures of politics versus partisan candidates, and the campaigns in Iowa and Florida are threatening that distinction in very real and very dangerous ways.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact press@rhrealitycheck.org.

Follow Jessica Mason Pieklo on twitter: @hegemommy

  • freetobe

    This is not just a hate Obama thing or a hate dems thing. This is something that started in  the Reagan days. The plan is for conservatives to take over the entire country, by winning every government seat.

     It will become a  one party oligarchy,theocratic ruled country.

    They have a lot of patience and will not stop until the job has been accomplished. People be warned we need to stop them altogether!

    Keeping women in the kitchen and in poverty is also part of the plan.( Much like the Handmaids Tale come to life. )

    In the constitution there is a clause that says that the slavery  can also be reopened for review. Now if Romney gets elected he can very well and will elect the worst conservative judge or judges  to the Supreme court which would rapidly pave the way to inequality for all people not white,straight and male.  Yes folks they want us to go backwards to the 1800’s.

    Yes it is that scary get out and VOTE in every election no matter what. We have to stop them!


  • julie-watkins

    Slavery is already currently legal for convicted prisoners. That happened in reaction of freeing the slaves when labor still needed to be done & former owners didn’t want to pay fair wages. So the prison population exploded (is still exploding).


    Re: the judge retention vote: one more sign that certain people don’t like checks and balances. The “justice” system is problematical (especially concerning War on (Some) Drugs & mass incarceration), but sometimes can do the right thing — especially if there’s a lot of grassroots social justice pushing.