Mysterious GOP Senator Wants To Define Flooding As Beginning at Fertilization (Oh, Rand Paul)


Updated to add that Kentucky Republican Rand Paul was apparently the “mystery senator.”

An undisclosed senator has informed Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid that he will block a bill to increase funding to the National Flood Insurance Program unless Reid allows an amendment stating that life begins at conception.

Via Politico:

[Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid] said Tuesday that a Republican senator – whom he did not name – is insisting on a vote on an amendment defining “when life begins.”

“I think some of this stuff is just – I have been very patient working with my Republican colleagues in allowing relevant amendments on issues, and sometimes we even do non-relevant amendments,” Reid said. “But really, on flood insurance?”

“After all the work that’s been put on this bill, this is ridiculous that somebody says ‘I’m not going to let this bill go forward unless I have a vote on when life begins,’” Reid continued. “I am not going to do that, and I think I speak for the majority of senators.”

Calling the request “outlandish,” Reid said he was told of the unspecified Republican senator’s demands on Monday night.

The GOP has added abortion amendments to many bills, but I believe defining life as beginning at the moment of fertilization is likely a first.

UPDATE: Our “mystery senator” has been revealed as Kentucky’s Rand Paul, according to the Huffington Post. On Monday, Paul introduced his “Life at Conception” act, and has been tacking it to everything he can find, including D.C. budget autonomy and now flood insurance.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with contact director of communications Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

Follow Robin Marty on twitter: @robinmarty

  • coralsea

    All I can say — and it’s neither articulate nor insightful — is “what an idiot!”  

     

    What is this supposed to mean in cases of miscarriage?  Are women–and their families–to be burdened not only with the loss of what will not be, in the case of wanted pregnancies, but with a concrete, legal pronouncement of death?  Is this supposed to open the door to an outright abortion ban, or to investigating women who have had miscarriages to determine whether they are at fault?

     

    And since this fool is such an Ayn Rand libertarian and proponent of “no-holds-barred” capitalism (no matter who it hurts), why does Rand Paul think it’s up to him to ask the government to make such a declaration, with all of the consequences that may come with it.

     

    I know — women don’t count to reactionary men like him, other than for bearing children, providing sex when they want it, cooking, cleaning, and otherwise slaving away. 

     

    Sorry for the intemperance of this post.  This sort of thing is driving me up the wall, since the majority of those who push for it have no real interest in the welfare of the children once they are born.