Fortnight for Freedom – Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing


The Catholic bishops have begun a two-week campaign leading up to July 4th with the central focus of removing contraceptive coverage from health insurance reform. Of course, the Supreme Court any minute now may end or modify the Affordable Care Act, which may make this debate moot.

The bishops are calling their campaign a “Fortnight for Freedom” and cloaking their objection to modern methods of contraception in a religious liberty argument. It is a classic example of those on the religious right who would restrict individual freedom to make private sexual choices co-opting language to confuse and gain supporters. It is reminiscent of the right’s coinage of “partial-birth abortion” for abortion procedures after 20 weeks and the use of the term “death panels” in health care debates.

As a religious leader and as a person of faith, I of course support religious freedom. So does the U.S. Constitution and so, I presume, do you. To me, and millions of people of faith, religious freedom means that all persons should be free to make their own personal decisions about their sexual and reproductive lives, including their decisions about when, whether, or if to have children. These decisions are optimally informed by their conscience, faith tradition, religious beliefs and families, but ultimately they are deeply personal decisions that individuals can and should have the freedom to make for themselves.

Religious freedom means that the government should not privilege the teachings of one religion over another or deny individual religious freedom. Individuals must have the right to accept or reject the principles of their own faith without legal restrictions. The Catholic bishops do not speak for all faith traditions on contraception; indeed they don’t even speak for the people in their pews who use and support family planning in overwhelming majorities. It is past time for the Vatican and the American Bishops to understand that they cannot claim final moral authority in domestic or (as we saw in Rio last week) international discourse.

It is up to each of us to not allow the Catholic bishops or anyone else to co-opt religious freedom. Universal access to family planning does not require anyone to use contraception – rather it assures that individual moral agency and conscience are respected. Supporting religious freedom means supporting the right of all of us to make our own moral decisions. We know a wolf in sheep’s clothing when we see it. 

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

  • rnevsimal

    Freedom of religion was intended to protect churches from government oppression.  The mandate threatens all churches by forcing people of faith to do things against their religion.  It doesn’t protect the freedom of unbelievers.  The mandate threatens to make the government almost totalitarian by telling people they can’t prctice their religion.  The mandate borders on facsism. 

  • jennifer-starr

    No, what the mandate does is keep people from imposing their faith on others who don’t follow their religious rules.  And that’s not totalitarian. 

  • crowepps

    Freedom of religion also was intended to protect people from the government being coopted by religious authorities to institute pogroms or harass heretics, and to protect people from being forced to follow the religious tenets of others religions merely because they are the local majority.

    People are absolutely free to practice their religion.  They aren’t free to use their economic power to require others who believe differently to practice their religious beliefs.

     

  • mhinch

    It amazes me that for the issue of birth control pills people think this is about “religious freedom”.

     

    It is perfectly okay for some that insurance companies, employers, doctors, pharmacists, and even the check out girl at Walmart can impose their personal religious beliefs on me. (I live in Oklahoma and ALL of these people can refuse to provide, prescribe or sell birth control to me without consequence.)

    Does that work for all religions?  Are you okay with your employer who is a Jehovah’s Witness not providing insurance that covers blood transfusions?  Or how about a Scientologist that doesn’t cover mental health issues – including ADHD and depression medication?

    You are okay with going to the pharmacy and having the pharmacist tell you that they do not believe in ADHD medication, so they won’t fill your child’s prescription?

    Freedom of religion protects the church from government oppression, but it also protects the people from religious oppression.