The Significance For Women and the Environment of a World Population of Seven Billion


This month the UN reports that the world population will hit a significant population milestone, 7 billion people. This has meaning for us all, especially in its environment and development impacts – and women are key. Women play a central role from two opposing perspectives: on one side they are especially vulnerable to the environmental changes now occurring (such as drought, sea level rise and/or more frequent, severe storms caused by human-induced climatic change), yet on the flip side, they can also be powerful change agents, with strong leadership roles in addressing the issues.

Women and girls are uniquely affected by these environmental changes in several ways, for example:

  • Women farmers grow more than half of all food in developing countries, up to 80 percent in parts of Africa, generally in small-scale crops for household consumption. Climate change impacts in the form of drought, increased desertification and soil erosion are negatively affecting agricultural production in Africa and, consequently, women’s livelihoods and their ability to support their families’ nutritional needs. In Kenya and Somalia, for example, women are facing the worst drought in six decades which is destroying their crops, and requiring them to walk even further than usual to fetch clean water. And, increased time spent on securing water and fuel wood is related to decreasing girls’ enrollment in school and lower literacy levels there.
  • Women and girls are also disproportionately vulnerable to climate change-related natural disasters and face a significant risk of disaster-related fatalities. Following the 2004 Asian tsunami, three-quarters of the fatalities in eight Indonesian villages were women and girls. In the second most affected district in India, Cuddalore, the proportion of female fatalities was nearly 90 percent due to lack of preparedness which is focused more on men and boys.

On the flip side, women can also be powerful agents for leadership and change on these issues, not only in their own communities, but also in the international arena if given the opportunity.

  • For example: Local grassroots women worldwide are implementing effective programs in their villages to address local environment and public health issues. Dr. Gladys Kalema-Zikusoka of Uganda does just that with the innovative NGO she founded, “Conservation Through Public Health”, where she integrates the needs of local villagers to co-exist successfully with the nearby native gorilla population. She helps villagers to not only protect the species and its habitat, but also realize the linked benefits of their own public and reproductive health, education, and livelihoods. Dr. Kalema’s powerful story also resonates loudly with UN and US “influentials” as they deliberate on related global development policies. The compelling personal narratives of such leading “global south” activists help us connect the dots between seemingly remote climate and other environmental occurrences, with the daily realities of the US and global communities’ policies and actions that affect us all.
  • At the international level, women are under-represented in deliberations and the decision making processes at key global forums such as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, UN “Rio +20″ meetings, and the UN’s Millennium Development Goals (MDG) process. Leading grassroots women activists from developing country NGOs such as the Green Belt Movement in Kenya and others, should be part of the official caucuses and country delegations to make that “local to global” link, so their unique perspectives are included first-hand in the global policy-making bodies that affect the villagers, too.

As an example, Dr. Wangari Maathai, Nobel Prize Laureate, utilized her message of women’s empowerment and environmental sustainability through the Green Belt Movement (GBM), which she founded to encourage Kenyan women to plant trees as both a livelihood, and to reforest the denuded countryside. Eventually her community-based model of extensive networks of women planters reached well beyond her nation’s borders, and is now an international movement encompassing tree planting, grassroots organization, and women and girl’s empowerment through conservation and development. Prof. Maathai said, “Women’s voices are largely absent from policy discussions and negotiations over global warming. Their experiences, creativity and leadership must be part of the solution.” She did something about it, with much success – an example of a woman leader who understood the power of grassroots change and organization, political savvy, and local to global linkages for messages that resonate at the global level on key environment and development issues.

So what can be done to empower women and girls in the face of a growing planetary population, with multiple pressures? A multi-faceted approach for all countries and global development initiatives come to mind: to empower women and girls through universal access to education, concrete political and economic opportunities, and good quality reproductive health. These are not now undertaken as a matter of course in most developing nations. In rural Africa, for example, 70% of girls do not complete primary school; regarding reproductive health, about 215 million women in developing countries who would like it lack access to effective family planning.

There is plenty of hard evidence that shows investing in women and girls is both cost-effective and essential, to solving the challenges facing today’s world. When women and girls are healthy, educated and can contribute fully to society, they become effective change agents, triggering progress in themselves, their families, communities and nations, improving prospects for current and future generations.

With our world now at 7 billion, we live in a place that our forbearers would not recognize; we must respond with new, better-honed awareness and strategic actions that respond to the new numbers and their implications, highlighting women as key players in meeting the needs of all, for a sustainable and equitable planet that is 7 billion-strong, and growing.

Sources: UNFPA, Center for Environment and Population (CEP), Climate Wise Women, National Geographic Society, WEDO, Population Action International, IUCN, UNFAO, World Bank, Oxfam International.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with contact director of communications Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • valeri

    With the actual long term sustainability going down rapidly with pollution and depletion of various kinds, 7 billion means we are 7 times sustainable long term at a “Euro” standard of living if living green and consuming an average of 2,500 calories per person per day ( generally acceptable world wide).  Any amount of children per family above 2.11 either keeps us reducing sustainability, or decrease the average standard of living (there are 1.4 billion extremely poor people right now).  The world average is at least 2.5 children per family.

    It is obvious that women need equal rights, education about sustainability, and free contraception, on a world wide scale.  The population needs to decrease rapidly as humanly possible to stop the decline in sustainability, and intercept the new long term level at where it will be at some point in the future, and level off there.

    If not, nature will do it for us, the hard way.