Senate Committee Votes to Lift Ban on Abortions for Peace Corps Volunteers in Cases of Rape, Life Endangerment

The Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Affairs, and Related Programs has passed a bill that would amend the current total ban on abortion care for Peace Corps volunteers by allowing the Corps to provide access to safe abortion services in cases of sexual assault, incest or life endangerment.

This Fiscal Year 2012 provision was included in the State and Foreign Operations funding measure approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee yesterday evening.  Current Peace Corps policy denies all coverage for abortion care services, even in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman is endangered. A wide range of advocacy and public health groups have condemned and fought to remove this ban.

Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) introduced the language amending the ban.

Women’s health organizations applauded the vote. “As a former Peace Corps volunteer, I am heartened by this small step forward in rectifying the Peace Corps’ discriminatory policies against female volunteers,” said Latanya Mapp Frett, vice president – Global, Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

“The women of the Peace Corps put themselves at increased risk of sexual assault in service to their country.  It is high time the U.S. recognizes the reproductive rights of its volunteers by providing them with comprehensive medical care in such critical moments.”

The bill also includes a modest increase in U.S. spending for family planning — from $615 to $700 million.  The additional funding would help make up for the disproportionate cuts the program faced this fiscal year.

This is one of several bills, including one on which we reported earlier this week that includes language banning the Global Gag Rule, that will become part of an omnibus spending bill in which all or parts may or may not pass in the final round.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact

Follow Jodi Jacobson on twitter: @jljacobson

  • crowepps

    Current Peace Corps policy denies all coverage for abortion care services, even in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman is endangered.

    Reading this, it’s hard to believe this policy was every put into place.  There is absolutely no excuse whatsoever for not covering necessary abortions to save a woman’s life.  It’s appalling anyone could have ever voted for that in the first place.  Pregnancy is not a capital crime.

  • seabisquick39

    It is hard to imagine what it would be like to be pregnant because of rape or incest.

    The pain of having to deal with an unwanted pregnancy is tough enough. Pregancies that come out of force are not an ideal situation for the mother or the child.  This lift of an incredibly unfair policy is a step in the right direction. 


  • sidnora

    Is the ban being modified on abortion care or abortion coverage?

    While I have, unfortunately, a very easy time believing that the federal government would withhold coverage from a PC volunteer seeking an abortion, withholding care implies that the volunteer is prohibited from seeking an abortion even at her own expense. Are they required to resign from the PC if they choose to seek an abortion?