The Anti-Choice Movement: A Dangerous Place for African American Women


In 2010 I had the honor of participating in the founding of the Trust Black Women Partnership, when I was invited to a meeting of women of color in Atlanta Georgia.  Reproductive justice activists had recently defeated race-baiting anti-choice legislation that came on the heels of a billboard campaign that advertised “black children are an endangered species” and “the most dangerous place for an African-American baby is in the womb.”  The Trust Black Women Partnership is a long-term strategy to ensure that black women can mobilize wherever such campaigns appear in African American communities, and to generate deeper discussions about black women’s autonomy and human rights.  Instinct fueled me to action, since I knew my home state of Missouri was likely to see a similar campaign in the future.  So, I returned home and immediately reached out to the reproductive justice community to share what we learned from the Georgia campaign and to organize women of color in St. Louis city and Missouri.

On March 21 Missouri Right to Life posted a copy of a new billboard campaign on Facebook. The billboard copy read “The Most Dangerous Place for an African-American Baby is in the Womb” and the description asked for donations to help Missouri Right to Life spread that message widely throughout Missouri.  I sat in front of my computer and stared at it a long time, disgusted that not only was Missouri Right to Life planning to put this disgusting advertisement up but that the organization was fundraising by indicting the humanity of black women.  Our Missouri reproductive justice committee came together, armed with the lessons learned from members of the Trust Black Women Partnership in Atlanta, Los Angeles, Milwaukee, Chicago and New York.  We organized and waited to see where Missouri Right to Life would launch their race-baiting fundraising campaign.  Two weeks ago, I received a text that the billboard was up in North St. Louis city.

I know the North St. Louis city neighborhood where the billboard has been placed well.  I’ve volunteered at a shelter for homeless teenage mothers, located just blocks from the intersection where the billboard was placed, for years.  I have friends and colleagues who live in the ward and I seriously considered reaching out to one of them to see if they could take a picture.  But I decided to drive over myself, parked on a street just past the billboard and got out of my car.  I stood there, shielding my eyes from the sun’s glare, for what must have been an hour.  It’s hard to put into words what I was thinking. I’ve faced a lot of insults in my life, walked through crowds of protestors shouting that I am a race traitor, an Uncle Tom, and chanting that I am participating in genocide against black people. Now a billboard making those charges against black women has been placed in my city, in a neighborhood less than 20 minutes from my home. Yeah, it’s hard to put into words just how disgusted and insulted I am.

Our local committee came together and developed our strategy.  Members reached out to Alderwoman April Ford-Griffin, who represents Ward 5 where the billboard was placed. A letter condemning the billboard campaign and demanding that the ad be removed has been sent to the owner of the billboard.  I’m proud to say that every member of the African-American caucus of the St. Louis Board of Alderman signed the letter, including the president of the board Lewis Reed.  We are still waiting for a response from owner of the billboard.  While we wait, women of color continue to organize and St. Louisans have reached out to share their disgust and offer their support.  Several people who identify as anti-choice have also expressed their dislike of this campaign and their concern over how it plays on long standing prejudices toward black women.

It is important to note that there are anti-choice billboards up all over St. Louis city and Missouri.  Some advertise the 40 Days campaign against abortion that takes place during Lent while others simply denounce abortion and are up throughout the year.  Our committee has taken no action against these other campaigns, although we disagree with the anti-choice message they advertise.  But there is a huge difference between advertising against abortion rights and a race-baiting fundraising campaign that advertises that black women are genocidal and violent.

It is also important to note that Missouri Right to Life’s concern for communities of color ends at birth.  Missouri Right to Life endorsed candidates have legislated against the best interests of Missourians in general and communities of color specifically for years.  Former Missouri state Rep. Cynthia Davis, who opposed funding for a program that provides food for thousands of low-income children during the summer by claiming that “Hunger can be a positive motivator”, was a Missouri Right to Life endorsed legislator. When Davis chaired the Missouri House Standing Committee on Children and Families, she refused to hear a child safety bill because abortion legislation was a higher priority.  Missouri Right to Life issued no statement reprimanding Davis nor did the organization speak out in support of the program funding food for low-income children through the summer.

Missouri Right to Life endorsed State Senator Brian Nieves, who used his filibuster of an extension of unemployment benefits to accuse out-of-work Missourians seeking benefits of enslaving working people.  Nieves eventually ended his filibuster after weeks of delay.  Missouri Right to Life issued no statement of support for the thousands of unemployed Missourians who would have been unable to feed their families had his stunt succeeded.

This year legislators endorsed by Missouri Right to Life overturned the voter supported automatic minimum wage escalator.  Missouri Right to Life issued no statement to explain how overturning the decision by Missouri voters to increase the minimum wage in the state and thus improve the standard of living for thousands of Missourians would benefit children or families or working people.

Missouri Right to Life opposes legislation that would ensure rape survivors be provided with information about emergency contraception in emergency rooms, legislation that would return comprehensive sex education to Missouri schools, and legislation that would support programs to provide treatment for and prevention of sexually transmitted infections.  Missouri Right to Life opposes the federal health care reform law, which would extend health care coverage to thousands of Missourians including many women of color who are currently uninsured.  The organization has instead advocated for the erosion of access to reproductive health care in Missouri. 

Oh, and they also launched a fundraising effort through a billboard campaign in a predominately black neighborhood that charges women of color with being dangerous violent genocidal threats to black children.

Reproductive justice did not happen to women of color.  We have been part of the movement to protect our right to decide whether to have children and how to raise the children we have from the beginning.  Women of color are capable of making decisions about our reproductive health care and, more to the point, are not required to register our qualifications with Missouri Right to Life or any other organization.  This racist billboard campaign resonates with some because they already lack respect for women of color, they buy into the theme that women of color are lesser than and threatening, and they find comfort in the belief that they are going to rescue us from ourselves by educating us about ourselves. 

This racist tactic of condemnation followed by oppression is not new.  Throughout this nation’s history, our call for reproductive justice has been a call for those who claim to want the best for us to trust us to know what is best for us. Sadly, trusting black women continues to be a challenge for Missouri Right to Life and anti-choice organizations. Trust that we will not set aside our rights while they work through their fear of empowered women of color.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Follow Pamela Merritt on Twitter: @SharkFu

To schedule an interview with Pamela Merritt please contact Communications Director Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • bkfamily1

    Pamela,

    You are disgusted by the billboards.  But you have no problem with an abortion rate among black women 3 times that of whites?  And you are OK with over half of the black women in New York City being killed before they are born?  So many black babies are aborted that the black community no longer represents the largest non-white community in our country.  And you think that by having the black population decimated by abortion, that is empowering to you, women of color and the black community?  It is OK with you that 4 out of every 10 black men and women are killed in their mother’s womb without any chance at life?  How exactly is that empowering?

  • starrsitter

    I’ve said it before, but how much sexual health education and access to contraception choices could be offered for the cost of these billboards?  Again, these people belie their supposed intent through their actions.

    Second, how do they completely ignore the disparity in access to health care when talking about the differences in rates of abortion in terms of race?  I’d bet a pretty good chunk of change that if you compare rates of abortion across similar economic groups, rather than racial groups, you’ll see a very different picture than the one that they’re presenting. 

    How about we change the slogan to “The Most Dangerous Place for Women is in States Where Republicans are Pushing Extremist Right-Wing Social Agendas.”

  • forced-birth-rape

    ~ American women do not have to be pregnant, give birth, live in poverty, be at the mercy of an abusive man, were republicans will have more soldiers for all the future wars they are glutton for.

    White women do not have to give birth so someone who cannot have kids, can adobt a white baby.

    Black women do not have to give birth were there will be more black people in America.

    Black women, white women, white little girls, and black little girls bodies, and vaginas do not owe anyone, anything, ever!

    Why dont you help black women have all the children they want?

    Answer, because the republican pro-lifers call them welfare queens.

    Pro-choice anti-force, because we do not like to heap misery, poverty, abuse, and helplessness on women, little girls, raped women, and raped little girls. ~

     

  • bkfamily1

    This comment has been removed.

     

    RH Reality Check is an unapologetically pro-choice publication, and the majority of our readers supports the struggle for sexual and reproductive rights, health, and justice.  We realize that some of our readers and commenters do not support these goals.  We embrace and encourage vigorous debate and civil discourse on the site and welcome comments representing diverse points of view that are evidence-based and reasonably engage the debate.  We reserve the right to delete, without further explanation, comments that misrepresent evidence or promote misinformation, that threaten or demean others, undermine the civility of discussion or seek to divert conversation from the topic of the original article.  We reserve the right to ban users who repeatedly abuse commenting privileges.

     

    RH Reality Check staff

  • saltyc

     if they were not being exploited for sex, they wouldn’t be pregnant until they had someone that was committed to their well-being for the rest of their lives

    Two people have sex. One of them is exploited, the other is exploiting. How can you tell? The exploited is the woman, the exploiter is the man? That’s infantilizing to women, and hateful to men. Reflect.

     

    PS having someone who is commited to her well-being means having someone who is pro-choice. If she can get pregnant from sex, and they’re having sex, and something goes wrong with the pregnancy, will he choose her or the baby? If he chooses the baby, he is not commited to her well-being above others, is he? If he chooses her then he’s pro-choice.

  • bkfamily1

    do you just rate anyone that disagrees with you a 1 so you don’t have to see their comments?  if someone is inconvenient for you, just get rid of them?  whether it is someone with a different opinion or a baby?  how about a rational discussion?  or do you just want a place to rant about the other side of the discussion without being challenged?

  • beenthere72

    There is zero threat to the black population.  Do some homework outside of pro-life websites.   Black women have higher birth rates than white women.

     

  • beenthere72

    We still read your comments, if only to see what some other DB has said now. 

  • purplemistydez

    Your comments are still there.  Just voted down.  Anyone can still access it.

  • crowepps

    It took only one exchange of posts for you to arrive at Sex is Bad/Keep Your Legs Shut Or Be Punished With Pregnancy.  Amazing.  Most people pretend it’s all about the fetus a little longer than that.

     

    What I’d be interested is knowing is how much money was received in donations to fund the billboard?  How much did the billboard cost?  What amount of money did the organizers put in their pockets?

  • beenthere72

    How about we change the slogan to “The Most Dangerous Place for Women is in States Where Republicans are Pushing Extremist Right-Wing Social Agendas.”

     

    Where can I contribute to a fund to put up that billboard? 

  • goatini

    Autonomous female US citizens are at liberty to be as sexually active as they desire.  They may desire lots of sex, or not a lot of sex.  They may desire to have sex with men, with women, or with either men or women.  

     

    Only perverted sickos think that female sexuality = exploitation.

     

    So we’re really sure where you stand on the issue, perverted sicko.  

  • arekushieru

    They may desire to have sex with men, with women, or with either men or women.

    Or at the same time, goatini.  Polyamourous partnerships, for example.

  • elburto

    You can have a 5 if you tell me (without mentioning adoption, infertile people, or religion):

    why you don’t want every child who is born to be destined for a home where they are loved, wanted, and adequately cared for?

    Tell me why you anti-choicers value quantity over quality every single time?

    Tell me why the same people fighting to deny women the choice of when to birth, are the same people fighting to remove programs that support new and growing families?

  • kirjava

    Possibly, but certainly not necessarily.

     

    You know what is exploitation, though?  Being forced to carry a pregnancy that you don’t want to continue. 

     

    And what does it matter whether or not a woman is in a committed relationship?  There are plenty of happily married women who have abortions, too.

  • plume-assassine

    The threat to some parts of the Black population is: a cycle of poverty fueled by endemic racism and oppression. The white oppressors think to themselves, “How can we keep ‘them’ out of ‘our’ universities, out of ‘our’ powerful, high-paying careers; how can ‘we’ stay on top… while not appearing to be obviously racist?” The answer, then, is to attack the reproductive freedom of Black women; they hide behind a facade of concern about abortion rates among women of color. Why? (Why do they pretend not to know that a higher rate of abortion is a result of a higher rate of unintended pregnancies… which are a result of little to no access to funds for contraception, and failing high schools… which are in turn a result of poverty that racism has helped to create?)

    Because. Because preventing & shaming Black women from being able to plan their family, of having no control on when/whether they will have children – that fuels the cycle of poverty. She must give up her career/education goals and life aspirations for many unplanned babies — a financially expensive predicament when you are trying to rise up out of poverty. Thanks to the anti-choicers and especially the anti-contraception folk, this is just the type of predicament that fuels the cycle of poverty and of violence. If the anti-choicers can ensure that she keeps as many unwanted pregnancies as possible on a low-paying salary and no welfare or WIC, then they will have succeeded in keeping her down, and others like her.   

     

    That’s why Christian white boys (probably like bkfamily1) express so much “concern” about Black women’s bodies. That’s right, I’m on to your game. It’s incredibly transparent and I will continue to expose it.

  • rebellious-grrl

    Try reading the comment policy.

  • arekushieru

    Yup! Exploiting a woman by using her physiognomy against her, especially through foisting one of the most dangerous medical conditions for women, worldwide, on her.  

  • therealistmom

    I could use a little “exploitation”.

     

    Of course, I didn’t know having orgasms was a form of exploitation. Does that mean I, erm, am exploiting MYSELF as of late??