Illinois — Less Preventing Unwanted Pregnancies, More Mandatory Ultrasounds


A recent judge’s ruling in Illinois will make it more difficult for women to obtain Plan B, an emergency contraception that works to prevent pregnancy if taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex. 

Via CBN.com:

On Tuesday, Sangamon County Circuit Court Judge John Belz struck down a 6-year-old state law that required Illinois pharmacies to dispense emergency contraception.

“We’re thrilled,” Mark Rienzi, a Catholic University law professor and one of the pharmacy owners lawyers, said after the ruling.  

“The law of Illinois and the law of the United States make it clear that people can enter the health care profession without having to check their conscience or religion at the door,” he said.

Glen Kosirog and Luke Vander Bleek, the pharmacists in the case, told CBN News they believe “Plan B” is an abortion pill. They pointed out that while the drug is designed to prevent fertilization, it can also kill a fertilized egg.

The circuit court judge appeared to sympathize with the pharmacists, ruling that forcing them to sell the pill would violate their right-of-conscience under Illinois law, and their religious rights under the U.S. Constitution.

Plan B is actually not an “abortion pill” but works to prevent fertilization.  It has no effect on women who are already pregnant.

The ruling is expected to be appealed.

Meanwhile, Catholic groups in the state are also pushing to force women seeking abortions to have to have mandatory ultrasounds and provide them to pregnant women prior to the procedure as a “courtesy.”  According to the Chicago Tribune:

[Catholic Conference of Illinois] would like to require women to view ultrasounds when considering abortion, but it says that wouldn’t pass in Illinois.

Opponents say the legislation would create an unnecessary hour of waiting time that is meant to be used to change a woman’s mind about the abortion.

Less prevention, more restrictions.  Sounds right.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Follow Robin Marty on Twitter: @robinmarty

To schedule an interview with Robin Marty please contact Communications Director Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • princess-jourdan

    I don’t understand this…doctors ALREADY perform ultrasounds prior to every abortion so that they can see the gestation and location of the zygote/embryo/fetus. So why do we need a law mandating something that is already done??

  • squirrely-girl

    … anti-choice legislators can look “tough on abortion” to their constituents who like that sort of thing. :/

  • equalist

    Because those silly women must not be looking hard enough at the ultrasounds, since they’re still having the abortion.  If only they’d look hard enough at that blob on the screen, they’d see the perfect blonde haired, blue eyed, heterosexual, christian male those cells could become.  You know, if natural spontaneous abortion, birth defects, race and traits of the parents, genetics, poverty, and free will are assumed to not exist.

  • goatini

    If you squint and cross your eyes, you’ll see a magical picture that isn’t there!

  • goatini

    dupe

  • equalist