How to Stop the Right’s Campaign Against Rape Victims

This post was originally published at New Deal 2.0, a project of the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute.

The Republican leadership is at it again. House Republicans rode into office on claims that President Obama and the Democratic Congress were promoting a “liberal” agenda rather than focusing on the real task at hand — job creation. Yet the first act of the new Republican House was a symbolic repeal of health care followed by a focus on the true conservative passion: regulating the sex lives of the most vulnerable and politically powerless women. The latest proposal, which would limit benefits for rape victims unless they could show that the rape was “forcible,” reintroduces a distinction that women fought for decades to eliminate — the notion that “real rape” can only occur when a stranger jumps out of the bushes and holds a woman at gunpoint. Otherwise, the woman must necessarily be complicit in the resulting pregnancy and should be forced to bear the child.

Anyone who seriously cares about women’s lives will oppose the measure. Merely trying to defeat it, however, is not enough. It continues the practice of letting the far right define the reproductive debate while those who champion reproductive justice play defense. It is time to turn the tables and propose practical changes that would actually cut public expenditures, protect rape victims and make the anti-women animus that motivates these proposals visible for all to see.

Wisconsin offers an inspiring example. It joined sixteen other states and the District of Columbia in signing a “Compassionate Care for Rape Victims” act into law in 2008. (For other states, see here.) The law, passed with significant support from pro-life legislators, requires that emergency rooms provide rape victims with information about and access to emergency contraception. The contraception, better known as “the morning after pill,” involves administering a high dose of progestin, the active ingredient in the birth control pill. The hormone prevents or delays ovulation but cannot dislodge an existing pregnancy. The treatment is relatively inexpensive, effective up to 72 hours after intercourse, and part of the ordinary standard of care for emergency room treatment. Yet a 2006 study indicated that 66% of Wisconsin emergency rooms failed to mention it to patients seeking assistance after a rape.

It took an impressive coalition of legislators, rape victims, and reproductive justice advocates to pass the bill. The victims testified movingly — and courageously — about their experiences. Doctrinaire conservatives, not unlike the Congressional Republicans urging the current restrictions, used intemperate language that referred to the “alleged” victims and questioned whether the rapes were “real.” Their callousness in the face of women testifying to terrifying experiences exposed the extremism of the opposition, which objects not just to abortion, but to contraception. The heartlessness embarrassed and split pro-life ranks and led to the passage of a measure that provided a real service to rape victims and reduced both abortions and government spending. Most importantly, it spared already traumatized women an unnecessary pregnancy or later abortion.

Women’s groups can gain ground only if we change the terms of the debate. We need to make compassion for victims the issue, not some abstract debate about whether rape is real. The only way to do so is to find a way to get what should be consensus proposals a hearing — proposals that take the trauma of rape seriously, make the real problem visible, offer workable solutions and expose the pro-life posturing in Congress for what it is: an ideological crusade that succeeds only so long as true victims remain invisible.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact

  • jennellen

    It chills my blood that they would have defined my (not even a date because he was a friend of my roommate) date rape as ‘oops, he got you drunk, waited till you passed out and you came to you were on the floor and he had had sex with you already’…because really….that’s rape.

    Legal wrangling to keep from paying for medical procedures is disgusting and beneath us as human beings. Not to mention that by defining it based on the experiences of lawmakers you essentially take a life changing experience and make it a legislative footnote. I still frequently engage in arguments about how it is beyond wrong that the rapist can have visitation rights to visit the child that came from their rape…exposing their victim to a lifetime of facing them and the child to the possibility of the same experience.

    To me the biggest problem with this whole need to define it as one thing and not another is that every rape is different but what they all have in common is that the person being raped did not have a choice. It’s not like I asked to be raped, it’s not my fault, I didn’t do anything wrong…but some people still act like it’s some kind of dirty little secret. It’s not. It happened to me but there is no need for me to excuse MY part in it. What I do need though is for people to realize how often it happens and how many people it happens to. I could bet money on the number of people who think it hasn’t happened to someone they know…and 99% of them would be wrong. It isn’t just happening to one race, one class, one age group, one religion, one country, or even one sex. It’s something that we need to bring out into the light of day so rapists know that people are going to talk about them and they WILL get caught and so that victims know they can get help and not be judged.

  • kenziewa

    Just to keep things straight, the following Democrats also co-sponsored the bill:

    Dan Boren (OK)

    Jerry Costello (IL)

    Mark Critz (PA)

    Joe Donnelly (IN)

    Daniel Lipinski (IL)

    Mike McIntyre (NC)

    Collin Peterson (MN)

    Nick Rahall (WV)

    Mike Ross (AR)

    Heath Shuler (NC)

    If one of these representatives is from your state, please contact them immediately and express your outrage that they would co-sponsor such a horrendous piece of legislation.

  • catseye71352

    All “blue dog” men, I notice. AKA DINO’s.