GOP Loves Government-Sponsored Health Care…For Themselves

If you are in Congress today, watching the floor debate on C-Span or otherwise following the debate over the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act (PPACA) in the House of Representatives, you know that the members of the new Republican majority really want to get rid of the health reform bill signed into law last year.  You also know the are really against government-sponsored health care.

Except, of course, for them. No matter what happens today, those crafty guys are keeping their own benefits, you can be sure.

Scott Keyes of ThinkProgress writes:

With the Republican legislative agenda increasingly focused on repealing health care reform, many observers are beginning to question whether GOPers in Congress will personally abide by their beliefs and take the next step of forgoing government-sponsored health insurance for themselves.

So far, according to ThinkProgress, only seven GOP congressman, or three percent of all 242 House Republicans, have opted out of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan.  In other words, 235 GOP congressmen will vote to repeal the health reform bill that insures coverage for millions of Americans currently uninsured, under-insured, or struggling with premium payments, but will go home at the end of the day safe in the knowledge that they will still receive all of the same health benefits and then some that they voted to take away from you.  And they are fully covered by the good ol’ government against which they spend most of their working days railing.

During the Congressional orientation last fall, one Republican loudly complained about having his own government-sponsored health insurance delayed approximately four weeks. But, notes Keyes, most GOPers have quietly continued to accept government-sponsored health care while loudly decrying the government’s role in helping provide health care to a segment of the American public.

ThinkProgress interviewed a few of these Congresspersons to ask them whether they plan to continue receiving those dreaded federal government health benefits, and why.

Their reasons for continuing to take government-subsidized health insurance ran the gamut, writes Keyes, “from Rep. Aaron Schock (R-IL), whose justification was that he was “actually lowering” premiums for older members of Congress [I really like that one], to Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), who admitted that accepting government-sponsored health care “could be” hypocritical, but shrugged it off nonetheless.”  At least he admitted it. 

ThinkProgress compiled a video of other Republican congressmen explaining why they want to repeal health care reform for the nation but plan to keep government-subsidized health care for themselves. Watch it:

On average, writes Keyes:

congressmen receive $700 per month in taxpayer subsidies to help pay for their health insurance. Members use these subsidies to choose a health insurance plan available through a government-sponsored exchange which, among other regulations, bars discrimination based on preexisting conditions.

As Lee Fang of ThinkProgress notes, “The federal system mirrors the reforms enacted by Democrats and President Obama, which end health insurance abuses by regulating coverage through an exchange, while offering subsidies to individuals and small businesses to make coverage more affordable.”

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact

Follow Jodi Jacobson on twitter: @jljacobson

  • puma

    thank you for examining the sick state of healthcare in America. 

    as an officially designated disabled person I have learned the hard way that the sickest joke the healthcare industry plays on us is a kin to pulling the wheelchair out from under a parapalegic then laughing, “if you really wanted to get up you would find a way.” this is exactly what congress is doing right now: trying to keep for themselves the resources that others need simply to survive. The free hand of the health care market should be compelled to take the physicians’ oath before it is allowed to euthanize the bill.

  • equalist

    I noticed that several of those interviewed mentioned that the American taxpayers are paying their salaries too. It brought up a thought. I wonder if the congress and the senate and other positions of great influence in the government were required to be done without pay or kickbacks from lobbyists, how likely would we be to get some honest people in office for a change?