Roundup: Carhart’s Maryland Clinic Opens to a “Pray Out”


Dr. Leroy Carhart has announced his plans to open multiple new clinics throughout the country now that his Nebraska clinic will no longer be allowed to provide abortions to women past 22 weeks gestation.  The first of these, in Maryland, opens its doors today, and the reception is, frankly, about what you would expect.

Via the Baltimore Sun:

Anti- abortion activists say they plan to protest at a Germantown clinic staffed by a Nebraska late-term abortion doctor.

Organizers say activists, clergy and others plan to picket Monday morning at the Reproductive Health Services clinic in Germantown.

Dr. LeRoy Carhart has said he wants to ensure more women have access to the procedure by expanding to states where it remains legal. A new Nebraska law does not allow abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

The protesters will be a regular feature in front of the clinic site in the hopes that they can force the new startup to close through pressure from other businesses in the area, who they will also try to disrupt business for, according to the Washington Post.

Organizers said they plan to stage regular, peaceful demonstrations as long as Carhart is working at the clinic. By holding regular protests, they hope other businesses in the office park will put pressure on Carhart to leave, [Rev. Patrick Mahoney, director of the Christian Defense Coalition] said.

Some business owners in the office park said news of Carhart’s planned arrival took them by surprise. They said they were unhappy about the planned protests.

“I don’t like looking at those bloody signs,” said lawyer Alice Pare, whose office faces the public sidewalk where demonstrators are allowed to gather. “They get kind of vulgar.”

Dentist Leslie Sabo, whose office faces the same sidewalk, said he was concerned about “the type of notoriety” associated with Carhart and the business impact of prolonged protests.

Mahoney, of the Christian Defense Coalition, said his organization has been contacted by business owners in the office condominium association who are upset about publicity surrounding Carhart. He declined to identify them.

At their request, his organization is providing legal assistance to the condo association to determine whether it can block Carhart from working at the clinic, he said.

Meanwhile, anti-abortion activists are planning to “pray out Carhart,” but they will also hit his condo association board meeting today, just in case that helps, too.

Keep up the prayers! We found out last night that the Condo Association
that controls the Business Park where Carhart will be practicing is having an
EMERGENCY
meeting on Monday at 12noon…DURING OUR PRAYER VIGIL!
Ask God to move on that meeting and lead the association to not only
Kick Out Carhart, but Kick Out the Abortion Center.

Please join us at the event on Monday, 11am in Germantown.

In Maryland, abortions are only legal after viability in cases of health problems for fetus and/or mother.  So who would Dr. Carhart be assisting at this new clinic?  Couples like this:

As the article opened, the husband, whom we’ll call Hank, described the three weeks leading up to his and his wife’s final decision that an abortion was necessary. As he depicted his wife, whom we’ll call Molly, grief seemed to seep out of his words. Hank noted her incessant tears in the weeks prior, and it was evident that his heart broke as he watched Molly’s heart break.

The morning finally came in which they were to go to the local women’s clinic. As Hank and Molly stepped out of their car upon their arrival, they were horrified to hear a group of protesters across the street labeling Molly a murderer.

Hank did not go into much detail about the protestors other than to make it clear they were Christians; however, he wrote something I will never forget. “I’ve never believed in heaven or hell. But there is a hell on Earth. Hell is sitting next to the person you love most and listening to her wail hysterically because her heart just broke into a million pieces. Hell is watching her entire body convulse with sobs because she’s being tortured with grief.”

Upon reading this, I was at a loss for words, and my eyes filled with tears.

As I continued reading, my tears only intensified. You see, Molly and Hank had not originally planned on having an abortion at all. Three weeks prior, their unborn baby had been diagnosed with Sirenomelia, a congenital deformity in which the baby’s legs were fused together. What’s worse, the baby would have been born without a kidney or bladder—a zero percent chance of survival. They had finally come to the conclusion that an abortion was necessary, because Molly couldn’t bear the thought of birthing a precious baby only to watch it die hours later.

Mini Roundup:  Need some “different” birth control ideas?  How about a tummy tattoo, or some crocodile poop?

December 6, 2010

December 5, 2010

December 4, 2010

December 3, 2010

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Follow Robin Marty on Twitter: @robinmarty

To schedule an interview with Robin Marty please contact Communications Director Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • erintothemax

    The idea that Dr. Carhart, rather than the protesters themselves, should leave because area residents and workers do not want to see protesters is ludicrous.

  • crowepps

    The article about the New Zealand decision doesn’t make it clear just exactly what is going to happen next.  The Court ordered ” the guidelines be amended to  “make clear the doctor’s ability to decline to become medically involved.”

     

    The article sounded as though the representative of the doctors is asserting that “medically involved” includes allowing the patient to find another doctor per this:

    Paragraph 13 of its code states: “Doctors should accept the right of a patient to be referred for further management in situations where there is a moral or clinical disagreement about the most appropriate course to take.” 

    “Right to Life contends that the judgment upholds the supremacy of an informed conscience. Abortion is a crime against humanity, it is a violent assault on a woman and her child that no law can legitimize. Doctors are the guardians and servants of human life,” Orr added.

    Is there any more information available about just what precisely it is that they are asserting the “supremacy of an informed conscience” allows the doctor to do?

  • crowepps

    The group claims Driehaus, who has campaigned as an anti-abortion candidate, supports taxpayer-funded abortions because he voted for the national health care law. Driehaus said the claim is false and that the law bars any federal funding of abortion.

    “A lie is a lie,” Driehaus’ lawyers wrote in his federal defamation lawsuit. “The First Amendment is not and never has been an invitation to concoct falsehoods aimed at depriving a person of his livelihood.”

    Since Driehaus is actually an anti-abortion Democrat, and it’s possible the lies in their campaign ads contributed to his losing the election, it will be interesting to see what the court does.  Is there a ‘free speech’ right to lie?