“28 Days On The Pill:” A Growing Schism in the Anti-Choice Movement


There was no reason to expect “28 Days on the Pill” to be an even-handed, unbiased documentary looking at scientific facts of contraceptive pills, and in that respect I was not disappointed. After all, the film’s introduction declares:

Christian worker, his family and a nurse friend investigate throughout North America to uncover the truth about the birth control pill. The debate has been raging for a decade and yet so few people know about it.

How could this be? How does the pill really work? Can everyday oral contraceptives really cause abortions? Why are so many people uninformed?

Discover how this could be a deadly silence. Find out what has shocked doctors and nurses. Be informed! Inform others!

Yet I did find myself surprised by the documentary over all, not because of the “facts” it presented, but because of the obvious intentions it had to persuade other Christians away from birth control, exposing a schism within the pro-life movement that so far has gone mostly unnoticed.

The documentary itself actually debuted over a year ago, but appears to be on a second set of legs due to its recent release on DVD, as well as streaming video. In the video, a Canadian couple pack their children into a car to wander across the U.S. and Canada, filming college girls who can’t explain how the pill works and doctors who for the most part state that since it can’t be proven that the pill doesn’t allow “fertilized eggs to starve to death,” that the pro-life community needs to avoid it all all costs.

But what is actually quite compelling about the documentary is that the blame for this apparent abortifacient Holocaust isn’t placed at the feet of the pro-choice movement, as usually happens.  Instead, it is presented as a clear and deliberate conspiracy by the pro-life movement, especially their medical professionals, who know that the pill causes abortions but are willfully misleading their patients to minimize controversy and absolve the parents of their guilt.

A large portion of the documentary is dedicated to Drs. Walter Larimore and Joe Stanford, two doctors who formerly served on the Focus on the Family’s Physician’s Resource Council, and whose work has become the cornerstone of the “birth control as abortifacient” movement. They argue that women are being deceived by their doctors, who aren’t allowing them the full information that progesterone that thins their uterine lining could possibly stop an egg from implanting, and that those doctors are violating doctor/patient relationship. “One of the things that is lost in this debate,” says Dr. Stafford in an interview, “Is ‘What do women think?  What do women believe? What do women want?  What is important for women to know?’”

Dr. Larimore agrees, stating, that the “vast majority of women” want to know that the pill could possibly cause and abortion “even if it is unproven, even if it is just a theory.” Why?  Because, Larimore claims, the women say, “We are good girls. We can make our own decisions because after all, it involves our bodies, and our baby.”

Those “good girls” come with a rather surprising statistic.  According to the doctors, of all women who believe that life begins at the moment of fertilization, only 70 percent of them say they would chose another form of birth control, a somewhat small number if they truly believe that the pill potentially causing abortions.

Although the villains in this documentary are the doctors, it’s not just any doctors on which the filmmakers focus their ire.  Pro-choice doctors are sharing the potential abortifacient information, the narrator tells us, saying that they have no problems with the nature of the drug or the potentially endless abortions.  It is the Pro-life doctors who are willfully leading their patients down a road of possible damnation by not sharing the true nature of the drug.

The doctors most at fault here, the filmmakers seem to believe, are those who form the scientific majority in the Physicians’ Resource Council, a board of physicians gathered to advise Focus on the Family on medical issues.  The filmmakers stopped by the Focus on the Family compound in Colorado Springs, attempting to get a “physician’s statement” on the birth control pill, but were denied such a statement.  The narrator then explained that a majority of the council members stated that they believe the pill has no abortifacient effects on women, and that Focus on the Family has never done a publication nor any radio broadcasts in which it covered the topic of birth control pills.

In an interview with Dr. W.D. Hager, the only pro-birth control pill doctor willing to speak with the filmcrew, the doctor stated unequivocally, “These pills still very effectively inhibit ovulation…If I felt that birth control pills were altering the ability of the pregnancy, which I’ve already stated begins at fertilization, to implant, then I would not be prescribing birth control pills.” Dr. Hager, a current member of the Physician’s Resource Council and a former member of the Bush FDA advisory committee regarding Emergency Contraception (Hager came out against E.C), spoke as a firm advocate of the drug, stating that all families concerned that life begins at conception can feel free to use the pill without worry.

Still, even having pro-life doctors tell then that the pill will not cause abortions doesn’t relieve these messengers from their duty to tell other Christians that taking the pill could potentially be murdering their children.  Dr. Stafford argues against Dr. Hager’s conclusion, stating, “There is no absolute proof either way, so you have to look at the majority of the evidence, and the majority of the evidence says that it is an abortifacient.”

If there is no proof either way, then why do the sides chose to continue waging this battle at all? According to Robert Fleischmann of Christian Life Resources, you will find your proof, once you get to heaven.  Once you arrive, you will be greated by all of the children you ever aborted, whether you knew about them or not.

The war against birth control is a daunting and unpopular battle, even among those who consider themselves pro-life.  The “28 Days on the Pill” filmmakers focused only on pro-life doctors to interview, and found themselves unable to get any response from the majority of pro-birth control contacts they reached out to, with only 2 of their 25 requests being answered. That a majority of the Physicians Resource Council, most Catholic doctors,and now a growing number in the evangelical movement, all believe that birth control is not in fact a sin, shows that despite their tenaciousness, the anti-birth control movement has a steep hill to climb to change minds. They are truly a small, but very very vocal, minority.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Follow Robin Marty on twitter: @robinmarty

  • catseye71352

    So those who oppose it reveal their true agenda…forcing women to bear unwanted children.

  • crowepps

    Oh, golly, they don’t want women to bear unwanted children at ALL. Instead they want all women to WANT to bear children.  It’s the difference between merely usurping the uterus to the religious agenda and going to extreme lenghts and attempting to control women’s minds and emotions.

     

    Or, of course, women could remain virgins like they’re SUPPOSED to since God apparently has had second thoughts about the wisdom of giving women actual bodies.

  • colleen

    Oh, golly, they don’t want women to bear unwanted children at ALL. Instead they want all women to WANT to bear children.

    Right. Because it’s the NATURE of women to sacrifice and bear as many children as possible. The women who disagree are disordered. In sacrifice, suffering and submission lies joy.

  • crowepps

    Sounds like a paean to theory of spirituality described so well by the Marquis De Sade, doesn’t it?

  • colleen

    doctors who for the most part state that since it can’t be proven that the pill doesn’t allow “fertilized eggs to starve to death,” that the pro-life community needs to avoid it all all costs.

    These people are certifiable.

  • crowepps

    Actually, it “can’t be proven” that being ProLife causes global warming since it is impossible for science to prove a negative.

  • bornin1984

    since it is impossible for science to prove a negative.

    Prove it.

  • wendy-banks

    Rolls eyes. Ugh. *coughnitwitcough*

  • colleen

    These kids aren’t religious, they’re an army. They’ve been raised to hate.

  • rebellious-grrl

    These people are certifiable.

    Yes they are. I could only handle watching the short version of the film, and that was bad enough. I tried to watch the longer version and gave up. Seriously laughable. What’s next? Are they going to start protesting pharmacies?

  • gordon

    Ah!  Dissent within the anti-choice ranks…what music to my ears.

    Collective soul unbind and leave to rot
    Alone its all-uncomprehending shards,
    In fear and hatred of the world they once
    United to destroy; composite voice
    Disintegrate, its fragments gibber home
    To Babel, and its truthless tongues to sand.

  • princess-rot

    According to Robert Fleischmann of Christian Life Resources, you will find your proof, once you get to heaven.  Once you arrive, you will be greated by all of the children you ever aborted, whether you knew about them or not.

     

    I actually raised an eyebrow at my laptop when I read that. I think that’s all the reponse it needed, it’s just so silly. If it’s hard for us to prove a negative, then he should have to qualify his statement with peer-reviewed, documented and photographed evidence that we have magical sperm-spirit children floating around in the ether, who sadistically wait for us to die, presumably to bother MRAs for alimony.

     

    For the sake of argument, surely if you’ve been “murdering children” you won’t go to heaven, or do you get some sort of mocking party of floating blastocysts who greet you at the pearly gates, at which point a trapdoor opens under your feet and you drop into Hell? I mean, since nature itself is extremely sloppy about which eggs get to implant, then every fertile woman who is middle-aged and has been having heterosexual sex regularly for over the course of her lifetime is likely to have “aborted” a “baby” (to use their definitions of the words), whether she was contracepting or not, though implantation failure is far less likely with the pill, which suppresses ovulation. Or is it something like Dante’s Inferno*, where the shades of unbaptised, stillborn, miscarried, or aborted babies gather in the first circle to torment incoming souls?

     

    * The poem, not the PS3 game. I realise Dante, the Inferno, Purgatory and whatnot are Catholic ideas and Mr. Fleischmann does not belong to their denomination, but they make a better story than being followed around by a cloud of ethereal eggs.