Roundup: Evangelicals Seek Common Ground On Contraception

Common ground.  It’s something we often like to talk about, but, it seems that when it comes to pro-choice and anti-choice discussions, there isn’t a lot of space both sides seem comfortable sharing.

But that may be about to change.  The National Association of Evangelicals has signaled that they are ready to begin to work on reducing the number of unintended pregnancies in one of the few ways we know actually works — access to contraception.  From the Pocono Record:

The NAE represents 40 denominations, many evangelical organizations and millions of American evangelicals. The NAE board of directors unanimously adopted a resolution that supports a wide range of efforts to decrease the number of abortions in the United States. According to a statement, the NAE noted results of a Gallup poll of evangelicals that “Significant majorities of (evangelical) respondents indicated support for a wide range of possible methods for decreasing the abortion rate — from parental consent and waiting periods before abortions to efforts at making adoption, pre- and post-natal care, and contraceptive services more accessible.”

NAE president Leith Anderson said the group will continue its active opposition to legal abortion, but members feel that despite this opposition they wish to “seek honest conversation” about ways to reduce the number of abortions. Such conversations “should build on our shared concerns for human dignity, protecting children and promoting healthy families and communities,” the resolution said.

Of course, taking this step isn’t going to be easy for the Evangelicals, who are already being harried by their “nothing but abstinence” counterparts for appearing weak. (LSN) asked Aaron Mercer, the project director for NAE Generation Forum, whether the NAE felt that advocating contraceptives could drive a wedge between the pro-life efforts of evangelicals and the Catholic church, whose teachings reject contraception as part of the modern-day attack on the family.

Mercer replied that the issue was “a subject that needs more exploration right now.” “We haven’t made any statements on that front,” he added, saying that the group had thus far merely pointed to what the Gallup poll indicated most evangelicals believed.

When it was pointed out that the “common ground” approach is often interpreted as a softened stance against legalized abortion, Mercer insisted that NAE officials “see it as part of the same effort” as previous pro-life advocacy. “The resolution makes that clear and we’ve stated all along that we continue to oppose abortion firmly, and we’re going to continue in that vein just as we have all along,” he said. “We know that ultimately abortion is going to be a problem if Roe v. Wade is on the books or off the books… and so we want to look at what are some practical ways that we can bring down that rate.”

Asked if the NAE considered making abortion illegal one of its goals, Mercer replied, “Yes. We haven’t changed our goals at all.”

The announcement couldn’t have had better timing.  Later this week, American Life League will be doing their annual “Pill Kills” protest, this time claiming that the pill doesn’t just abort babies, but destroys the environment, too. And at the same time, the Catholic Bishops continue to use their strict and often incorrect medical interpretations to try and stop most contraceptives from being more easily accessible in new healthcare plans, according to Politico.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, for example, opposes categorizing birth control among preventive services.

“Congressional debate on the need to cover ‘preventive services’ in health care reform centered on services needed to prevent life-threatening diseases like breast cancer, not on a need to prevent the birth of new recipients of health care,” Richard Doerflinger of the conference’s Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities e-mailed POLITICO.

“Requiring contraception and sterilization in all private health plans would be an enormous imposition on the consciences of religious organizations and others who now have the right to purchase a health plan in accord with their moral and religious values.”

With all of these factions at work, can common ground ever be reached?  One can only hope.

Mini Roundup: An HIV positive woman about to give birth allegedly could not get admitted in multiple hospitals in Suryapet, and instead gave birth on the side of the road.  She was said to be removed from her original hospital once her HIV status was disclosed, subjecting both her, her child and her attendants to additional risks.

May 31, 2010

Christian conservatives target seated judges – The Associated Press

Online only – Of abortions and Sister Margaret McBride… – TODAYonline

Mexico: Supreme Court Protects Rape Victims – Bikya Masr

Burris Amendment Will Repeal Ban on Abortions for Servicewomen – Firedoglake

Crisis Pregnancy Center In Maryland Sues County So They Can Keep Lying To Women – Blue Wave News

Montana Personhood Amendment Backers Trying Again for Abortion Ballot Vote –

Indiana Abortion Advocates Challenge Fort Wayne Measure for Women’s Safety –

Antidepressants during pregnancy increase risk of sponaneous abortion, study finds – Los Angeles Times

Dr. Tiller’s Murder: A Year Later – Opposing Views

William McGurn: Gallup’s Pro-Life America – Wall Street Journal

Some progress on the thorny abortion issue – Pocono Record

Evangelicals Launch Effort to ‘Reduce Abortions,’ Float Contraceptive Advocacy – Lifesite

HIV woman refused admission, gives birth by roadside – Times of India

Australia Launches Sixth National HIV Strategy – Gov Monitor

HIV woman gives birth by the road  – The Hindu

Vaginal Gel That Kills Herpes, HIV May Be Available by 2012 – BusinessWeek

HIV patient delivers baby on roadside –

Human Trials Next for Promising Breast Cancer Vaccine – One News Page

Breast Cancer Vaccine Shows Promising Results– CBS News

More women using midwives in the hospital – KPNX-12

Safe motherhood day observed – The New Nation

NHIS vows to improve maternal, child health – Vanguard

June 1, 2010

Don’t condemn abortion choice –

Letters: Abortion overshadows women’s movement – Appleton Post Crescent

Pro-Choice Media – Big Think

Teens need access to contraceptives – Press & Sun-Bulletin

Birth control now a flash point – Politico

1300 dying of Aids every week – The Zimbabwe Guardian

Namibia HIV women sue over forced sterilisation – BBC News

Canada ready to spend $1 billion on maternal health – Hamilton Spectator

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact

Follow Robin Marty on twitter: @robinmarty

  • rachel-larris

    If you read the original press release by NAE they only mention contraception exactly once as part of a gallup poll.

    “Significant majorities of the respondents indicated support for a wide range of possible methods for decreasing the abortion rate – from parental consent and waiting periods before abortions to efforts at making adoption, pre- and post-natal care, and contraceptive services more accessible.”

    Even if regular church-attending evangelical Christians would generally support efforts to expand access to contraception it will be a cold day in Hell before an institution like NAE would endorse such efforts. Their leadership would never allow such a policy stance to be endorsed.

    Time and time again I have never seen any christian group truly endorse a compromise on contraception as a means to reduce abortion rates. Look at that list from the Gallup poll, with the exception of contraception every single one of those items is about preventing women from CHOOSING TO HAVE AN ABORTION, even though NAE admits in their own press release:

    “Particular focus will be placed on young adults since they, not teenagers, have the majority of abortions.”

    So parental consent wouldn’t matter anyway in this context.

  • colleen

    It’ll be a cold day in hell before the NAE endorses the use of contraceptives. They aren’t primarily interested in reducing the number of abortions, they’re interested in keeping women in our place as masturbatory aids, incubators and a reliable source of cheap or free labor. Indeed, their religious authority depends on it.

  • ahunt

    as masturbatory aids, incubators and a reliable source of cheap or free labor. Indeed, their religious authority depends on it.


    Succinct. And whenever a woman so much as questions her role…she is selfish, unwomanly, displeasing to God, displeasing to men (read God)… her salvation is revoked…by men who are the primary beneficiaries of her sexual , personal, iintellectual, economic and public self denial.


    Gotta love it.