Repro-Briefs: The Lesser-Noticed Abortion Battles

Mandatory ultrasounds, fetal pain bills, and ridiculous waiting periods.  We watched a lot of anti-choice legislation get passed in the 2010 session, but here are a few losses and victories that may have been missed among the more headline-grabbing fights for reproductive choice.

North Dakota

It’s been a while since the Dakotas have had a ballot measure to get them fired up against abortion.  That appears to be the plan with the recently introduced “Skull Crushing and Decapitation Ban Act.”  The ban is an effort to save a “living unborn child,” according to the initiative petition, and has such wonderfully vague language as:

1. “Decapitation” means serious bodily injury in which a person uses any instrument or procedure to grasp the skull or neck of a living unborn child for the purpose of separating the skull from the neck

2. “Skull Crushing” means seriously bodily injury in which a person uses any instrument or procedure to grasp the skull of a living unborn child for the purpose of compressing or collapsing the skull in a life-endangering manner.

that it could likely be applied to almost any procedure that isn’t a medical abortion.

The Secretary of State approved the proposed petition, which now needs approximately 13,000 valid local registered voter signatures to make it onto the ballot.


Although Wisconsin has some terrific programs in place like Compassionate Care and now the Healthy Youth Initiative, getting them implemented properly can still be a problem.  Compassionate Care, a program to ensure victims of sexual assault have access to emergency contraception, was passed two years ago, but it appears some hospitals still aren’t getting with the program, according to the Wisconsin Radio Network.

Emergency contraception is still not available at all Wisconsin hospitals, according to a new survey. Two years after Compassionate Care for Rape Victims became law, a survey by the Wisconsin Alliance for Women’s Health finds twenty-two percent of state hospitals are not complying.

“We weren’t totally surprised that many hospitals were lacking resources they needed, to truly comply with the law,” says the Alliance’s Sara Finger. “It just goes to show that there’s more work to be done, to educate and empower hospitals.”

Sara Finger with the Alliance says they’re distributing a comprehensive compliance tool kit to every emergency room and sexual assault nurse examiner in the state to help overcome a lack of resources. Other hospitals continue to object to the law, citing “provider beliefs.” Finger says that’s a matter for education. “The AMA, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Public Health Association, the AMA, all agree that emergency contraception is the standard of care to provide a rape victim in preventing a pregnancy from her attacker.”

South Carolina

Still, we do get to find some small victories here and there.  In South Carolina, an attempt to pass a personhood amendment via bureaucratic hocus pocus after it had been stalled in the legislature got completely shut down, with even Republican leaders chastising the maneuvering.

The Senate put turned back a bid Tuesday to bring anti-abortion legislation to debate on the Senate floor – an effort by an Upstate Republican to bypass stalled hearings at both the subcommittee and full committee levels.

The action, led by Sen. Lee Bright, R-Spartanburg, stalled Senate business, delaying final passage of a cigarette tax increase to 50 cents a pack.

Bright, who has emerged as the Senate’s most vocal opponent of abortion rights, tried to force a vote on bypassing the committee hearings.

“This is one of those gotcha votes,” McConnell protested. “You’re for abortion or you’re against it.”

Bright said he took the step because his bill, S450, which seeks to establish fetal personhood, was introduced in February 2009 but had not yet come up for debate.

“Never debating the cause – I don’t see how that helps,” Bright said.

An irritated Senate president pro-tempore Glenn McConnell, R-Charleston, blasted the move, however, which he said not only breaks Senate procedure, but also would wind up costing the state money.

“It is unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution,” said McConnell, an attorney. “Let me tell you what he is trying to push on us: This bill would make a doctor guilty of manslaughter or murder if it goes forward.”

McConnell, who described himself as “pro-life,” scolded Bright for attempting to change U.S. law established by the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade case, by passing a conflicting state law.

McConnell also blasted Bright for attempting to force senators either to support that effort or look as if they favor abortions.


Much attention is still on Florida for passing a new restrictive mandatory ultrasound bill.  But one thing that went mostly unnoticed was a push for more onerous rules around judicial bypass for parental consent, including only being able to go to your local judge, a higher level of evidence to prove the teen is “mature enough” and host of waiting roadblocks intended to, among other things, delay the teen until she is too pregnant to obtain the abortion itself or force her to have a more invasive procedure.

The best part?  This add on measure from the committee:

The House Criminal and Civil Justice Policy Committee added a measure to mandate a judge determine whether a minor is aware of the “shortage of unborn babies available for adoption.” It passed 11-4, but defied party lines with a moderate Republican and a Catholic Democrat switching sides.

Happily, the Florida senate killed the proposed new regulations.

A controversial bill to expand parental notification for abortion appears dead this session after the Senate Health Regulation Committee failed to consider the measure Monday. It is still moving in the House, so critics are careful not to celebrate yet.

But it’s the legislation’s supporters who are throwing in the towel — and blaming bill sponsor Sen. Andy Gardiner.

In an e-mail titled “UNBELIEVABLE,” the Christian Family Coalition said Gardiner “ran out on his bill” and “lost all credibility” with supporters. He left the room before it was considered and asked committee Chairman Don Gaetz to postpone it. The committee won’t meet again this session.

“This is the biggest act of COWARDICE that I have seen a public official display in all of my years in statewide politics, he didn’t even have the decency to stay in the committee hearing room and postpone his own bill,” said Anthony Verdugo, the founder of Christian Family Coalition in a statement. “Someone needs to get the message to Gardiner that politics is a contact sport and NOT for the faint at heart!”

Not for the faint of heart, sure. But it’s nice to see some politicians remembering to have a heart at all.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact

Follow Robin Marty on twitter: @robinmarty

  • prochoiceferret

    The House Criminal and Civil Justice Policy Committee added a measure to mandate a judge determine whether a minor is aware of the “shortage of unborn babies available for adoption.”

    What’s next, a mandatory viewing of Juno?

  • crowepps

    Must say, though, just exactly how does one go about adopting an unborn baby? Do you adopt the pregnant woman?

  • educated-rants

    On the last day of the 2010 Legislative Session, the Florida Legislature passed HB 1143 – sweeping anti-choice legislation that restricts women’s access to reproductive health care and drastically chips away at Roe v. Wade.

    House Republicans rammed through a measure  to require women seeking an abortion to pay for an ultrasound and hear a doctor give a description of the fetus. The cost of an ultrasound exam can vary between $200 and $1,000.


    The bill also restricts businesses that receive tax credits from providing their employees with health insurance that covers abortion, even if they don’t use federal or state subsidies to purchase their plans.


    This goes far beyond the Hyde Amendment by prohibiting abortion from being covered in private health insurance plans.


    This attack on women’s health care  by anti-choice Republicans passed both chambers despite never being vetted through a single committee, and never allowing for public comment.  


    Help us urge Governor Crist to veto HB 1143, which interferes with private health care decisions and restricts private health insurance from offering abortion coverage.


    HB 1143 currently awaits the Governor’s decision.


    Women will not stand for legislation that takes away our rights and leaves us worse off than we are today.


    Tell Governor Crist to veto HB 1143. 

  • princess-rot

    Odds on that the minors told about this, ahem, “shortage” of adoptable fetuses will be white minors?

  • crowepps

    After all, it’s pretty fashionable to adopt a ‘minority’ baby so that all your acquaintances can see visible proof that you are ProLife and have ‘snatched a brand from the burning’.

  • think4urself

     Louisiana: In an effort to advance his bill (HB 1247), state Rep. Frank Hoffmann on Wednesday agreed to remove a provision that would have banned private insurance companies from covering most abortions, the Baton Rouge Advocate reports. The revised version of the bill would prevent insurance plans participating in the state’s health insurance exchange from covering abortion procedures, except to save the woman’s life. The bill also would not apply to procedures after miscarriages. No exceptions would be made for victims of rape or incest. The bill passed the Senate Committee on Health and Welfare 5-2 and now heads to the full Senate for debate (Millhollon, Baton Rouge Advocate, 5/27). The committee also passed a House bill (HB 1370) that would give the state’s heath secretary increased authority to revoke or deny an abortion clinic’s license because of safety concerns. The measure now goes to the Senate floor (Deslatte, AP/WAFB, 5/26).
    -From Daily Women’s Health Report email

    My niece and myself both have had to have a D&C following what my doctor called (in 1993) a “missed miscarriage”. The fetus was dead but the body was not expelling it on its own. The D&C was done due to the fetus’ eventual decomposing that could lead to a serious infection. According to this new law in Louisiana, the procedure my niece and I had to have would not have been covered. I guess in Louisiana they would prefer for the woman to go into septic shock from a massive infection in her uterus due to a decomposing fetus before they would ever consider it as needed to save the mother’s life.

    I’m so glad that I don’t live in Louisiana today!

  • robin-marty

    it looks like they have changed the bill to allow miscarriage management now, but I totally understand what you are saying.  I also had a D&C after a missed miscarriage in October, actually few days before Stupak-Pitts was first announced.  My first thought in hearing it was that miscarriage management would lose coverage as well.