Separate and Uninformed: Discrimination Against Pregnant and Young Latina Mothers in California Schools


Separate is not equal.  We know that to be true in many contexts, including historically segregated schools, neighborhoods, and institutions.  The young people in our communities seeking an equal opportunity to learn, be healthy and thrive face countless challenges as the policies created to support them are but a faint backdrop, if present at all, in their lives.  

This is especially true if you are a young person of color in California.  And if you happen to be pregnant, or a young mom, the promise of an equal education is made even more obscure by our institutions. Separate schools for pregnant and parenting youth are not equal.

According to a new report by California Latinas for Reproductive Justice, Young Women Speak Out!, pregnant and parenting young Latinas face systemic discrimination in educational institutions, lack access to equal educational opportunities and experience a dearth of social supports in their communities.

In a series of focus groups conducted in key regions of California, we learned that pregnant and parenting youth experience persistent discrimination and bias from teachers and school officials.  This includes pressure to transfer out of comprehensive high schools into alternative programs and being relegated to substandard instruction, despite federal and state legal protections. 

One young woman shared her own experience:  “I had to leave; my principal or superintendent told me ‘you can’t stay here while you are pregnant.  You have to go to another school, because the pregnant school is required for pregnant people.”  Another young woman described the “academics” she received at the so-called “pregnancy school” she attended:  “my teachers…didn’t even teach the class she just gave us work that we had to work out of our workbooks… She didn’t teach us anything academic wise.”

Other focus group participants stated that, even though they weren’t forced to leave their schools, they were ostracized within their institutions by being “kept in one corner of the school.”  At the same time, Latina youth reported to CLRJ a lack of social supports in schools and their communities for continuing their education and accessing positive opportunities.  “Maybe if I would have been more exposed to colleges and stuff like that at a young age, maybe it would have motivated me to do good in school,” reflected one young woman.

We also learned that young people aren’t receiving the full information and resources they need to make well-informed decisions about their health and lives. Even in a progressive state like California, where longstanding policies require comprehensive, medically-accurate instruction by schools that choose to teach sex ed, young people are still at risk of receiving biased and inadequate information.

Young Latinas reported that sex education was more of an afterthought rather than a class designed to give adolescents the opportunity to learn about contraceptive usage, resources and referrals for STI testing, among other provisions that promote youth sexual health.  Others reported hearing shame-based, abstinence-only messages.

These experiences send a strong message that schools are failing to monitor the implementation of comprehensive sexuality education required under California law.  Our educational systems must do a better job of ensuring that every student receives medically accurate, culturally-competent information in a setting where they feel comfortable asking questions.  

We know from research and our own experience that Latina/o parents strongly support comprehensive sexuality education.  A recent study by the Public Health Institute found that 90 percent of Latina/o parents in California support comprehensive sexuality education.  At the same time, the focus group participants encouraged the availability of sexuality education for their parents and more communication about sexuality within their families. Why aren’t educational institutions listening to our youth and their families?

If we really want to support young people, particularly the most disenfranchised youth, we need to start by examining their realities and ensuring that our policies are promoting their health and educational opportunities.  Keeping them in the dark about critical information they need, then blaming them for the consequences, is not the answer.  And relegating young women who are pregnant to a corner of the school — or to another school altogether – is not only counter to civil rights laws, it is a shocking denial of young people’s dignity. 

It is time for our educational institutions to take action and ensure that all young people – including pregnant youth and young families – have equal opportunities to learn, be healthy and parent with dignity. Separate and uninformed has never been equal.  Not then, not now.  Not ever.  

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with Rocio Córdoba please contact Communications Director Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • j-parker

    Thank you, Rocio and CLRJ, for this important work! The way we treat mothers and families – particularly those who are young, low-income or people of color – speaks volumes about our commitment to reproductive justice. True reproductive freedom requires the information and services needed to understand and take care of your body, the right and opportunity to make the decisions that are right for your life, and the support needed to live out those decisions with dignity. Listening to the voices of young people and young mothers will help guide us toward better meeting the needs of all women and families.

  • mechashiva

    I went to high school in CA, and I hate to say it, but I got practically no sex ed there. I was in the San Francisco Bay Area, to boot.

     

    Once a year, volunteers would go to a few classrooms and put on a 5-10 minute presentation about HIV that was less in-depth than what was covered in the puberty-talk we got in Alabama’s 5th grade. Nothing about pregnancy. Nothing about other STDs. Nothing about consent. Nothing about abuse in relationships. Nothing about sexual orientation. Nothing about birth control. (I’m serious… I didn’t know what “the pill” was until my friends who were already sexually active told me about it, and I didn’t believe them. Emergency contraception sounded even more unbelievable to me, because I just didn’t think it was possible to prevent pregnancy. I’d never heard of the concept.) It was pathetic.

     

    In my four years, I saw the HIV presentation twice, and I am willing to bet some kids never saw it (they didn’t go to every class, and when kids switch rooms every period it is hard to make sure you get to everyone). You’d think CA’s most notoriously liberal metropolis would do a better job. Unfortunately, I suspect that prop 13 has had an influence on the level of sex ed offered, just as it has effected most subjects. California might be liberal, but its school system is horrible compared to what I have seen in other states. Most people haven’t seen what schools are like in differen areas, though, so they don’t know just how bad things are.