A New Generation of Abortion Rights Activists


The following was first published at ChoiceUSA.org

—–

This week Newsweek published a new article claiming younger generations are more “lukewarm” to abortion rights issues. Using polls, surveys of young Democrats’ voting issues, and the ages of abortion rights groups’ directors, author Sarah Kliff suggests us twenty-somethings are just not as interested in protecting our right to choose.

What interests me here are not the possible reasons why young people might not see anti-choice legislation as much of a threat. Blogger and activist Elise Higgins combats that claim full on:

Some say that millennials don’t view abortion as imperiled or in need of defense. I beg to differ with this massive generalization. Do I think we need to be defensive about our abortion rights? No. I think we need to launch some offense. From the Hyde Amendment to the Nelson Amendment, universal rights to safe abortions have eroded since Roe, and no one knows that better than young people. We are on the front lines; we’re victims of policies that marginalize poor people, queer people, people of color and people with disabilities. We’re more than aware that abortion rights are imperiled. We live that reality every day.

What interests me mostly is the methodology of Kliff’s observations. She notes that mainstream reproductive rights groups like NARAL and NOW are mostly made up of a “postmenopausal militia,” that Democrats aren’t as uniform on abortion as they used to be, and quotes polls that surely reflect a growing misunderstanding of abortion in general. So in this sense she is absolutely correct: young people don’t run organizations that focus solely on abortion. The Democrats aren’t trustworthy protectors of abortion rights. And anti-choice propaganda, ever-present in any suburban conservative upbringing, does indeed ingrain a wealth of misinformation into the psyches of the newer generations.

What Kliff ignores, however, is monumental. We may not be heading up established organizations that write letters and lobby, but we are starting our own, grassroots organizations that are taking on barriers to abortion access on the ground. We protest, we escort, and most importantly, we listen. For far too long organizations that used catchphrases like “abortion is a personal decision” have ignored the experiences of women who have had them. We’ve seen women who have had abortions go to “the dark side” because it allowed women to feel anger, shame, guilt, and sadness over their abortions; Norma McCorvey or “Jane Roe” is a prime example. When pro-choice groups refuse to take on the more complex side of what we fight for, we close off these experiences instead of addressing them head on. Fortunately, the rise of the “pro-voice” movement, right from within our own generation, has stepped up to the plate to make sure we do not make that mistake again.

We have also evolved in our understanding of feminism in general. The second-wavers who founded NARAL and NOW paved the way for us to have and protect the legal right to abortion, but what of the personal ability? My generation has seen legal abortion fail countless times as Roe gets hammered away at, and we have seen what happens when access is limited. My generation is one that has began to take into account the racial differences within reproductive issues, and we are beginning to mainstream discussions about reproductive justice: a far cry from wealthy white women not wanting to have babies, we see that, throughout history, women of color have been coerced into not having babies. We’ve begun to recognize that access to abortion is tangled up in a web of restriction in all matters reproductive, from contraception to abortion, from coerced sterilization to birthing options.

Public opinion is always a tricky battleground. By the time we grow to understand the reasons why people are dissuaded from supporting abortion rights, anti-choice factions have already launched new attacks. They’ve been successful in playing the “compassion” card, for example. Crisis pregnancy centers work to the detriment of true choice by manipulating a vulnerable woman’s options, and they do it all in the vain of “supporting women.” That abortion doesn’t really cause breast cancer, infertility, or depression is beyond importance; all it really takes is a woman in a white lab coat in a clinic-like environment, and suddenly her claim is legitimate.

Abortion rights activism has not waned, it has evolved. Even in the “good old days” that brought us such fantastic mother organizations such as NARAL and NOW, there was a struggle to find women who would give their lives to the cause. Abortion has always been a battleground issue in Congress, and it will continue to be; that several anti-choice legislators dominate the debate is nothing new. And though public opinion about abortion is continually manipulated with nonfacts and reframing, I can assure the postmenopausal militia that we are not giving up. As legislative obstacles were your battleground, public opinion and access campaigns are ours, and like you, we do not plan on losing.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with contact director of communications Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • truth

    Part of the reason the younger generation is waking up to the fact that killing an innocent human being in the mother’s womb is wrong is due to our technological advances and availability of that technology. CPCs around the nation have made it their mission to get the woman “considering her options” to view what is being “knitted in her womb” through the use of ultrasound technology. Even talking about it with them is powerful enough sometimes because they already know what is growing inside even if they don’t want to “see” it for themselves because they may still want to kill and get “the problem” over with…

     

    Another example is when a woman gets pregnate, and is excited about the baby coming into the world. She gets a regularly scheduled sonogram and what does she do next? That’s right…she shares the images of her baby with everyone. It is sooo exciting… This natural spreading of excitement of the new life entering the world cannot be subdued by misinformation and lies. So when this woman later gets pregnant “accidently” she remembers those photos of that young life growing (now) inside of her.

     

    You are fighting the uphill battle of eradicating human life – the most innocent of human life – …and…so…you’ve already lost.

    • wendy-banks

      @ ‘truth’ You are so full of it I don’t even know where to begin. How can you lie so much and think it’s the truth? It blows my mind– You can look at hard, cold FACTS and say it’s not real. Or say’My church said this and this and this’ Or ‘This pro-life website said this’. You don’t even have a CLUE do you? Man, I hate liers. Worse yet, ideologs spouting garbage and calling it the truth. You sound just like a Faux News talking head at it’s very worst.

      At least pro-choicers admit when then don’t know something, and get the facts.

  • prochoiceferret

    CPCs around the nation have made it their mission to get the woman “considering her options” to view what is being “knitted in her womb” through the use of ultrasound technology.

    Yes, along with emotional pressure (“Of course you don’t want to abort! Now let’s give your unborn baby a name!”) and outright misinformation (“Abortion causes breast cancer!”). We know how they work.

    Even talking about it with them is powerful enough sometimes because they already know what is growing inside even if they don’t want to “see” it for themselves because they may still want to kill and get “the problem” over with…

    Yes, because women are too stupid to be aware of what happens in pregnancy unless you tell them and/or show them what’s going on. “Gosh, I didn’t know there was a whole little person inside of me!”

    This natural spreading of excitement of the new life entering the world cannot be subdued by misinformation and lies. So when this woman later gets pregnant “accidently” she remembers those photos of that young life growing (now) inside of her.

    Yes, it’s not like women who have already had children ever decide to abort, after all. Even if they can’t afford to raise another child, the pregnancy makes her so “excited” that she finds a way to make it work.

    You are fighting the uphill battle of eradicating human life – the most innocent of human life – …and…so…you’ve already lost.

    No, we’re fighting the (alas, sometimes uphill) battle of getting people to respect womens’ choices regarding their own bodies and lives. The reproductive-rights movement is a part of the womens’ rights movement—you know, the one that got them the right to vote, to get a higher education, to not be treated as property? And if you think the same forces that the movement has prevailed over in the past aren’t the ones we’re fighting against now, then I’ve got a slightly-used bridge to sell you.

  • princess-rot

    Of course, it’s entirely impossible to feel anything other than delirious happiness at the thought of pregnancy, and all women are stupid sheep who don’t know what “pregnant” means. There is no such thing as patriarchy, CPCs totally don’t practice coercive adoption policies, and women are totally equal in society. Nobody views us as baby dispensers if we are white, and money-grubbing welfare queens if we are of color. Pro-lifers are only concerned with protecting fetal life from the selfish actions of misguided women in a fallen world. There is no such thing as unwanted pregnancy. Only bad girls have sex. Childbirth and parenting is really, really easy and anyone who feels incapable of doing it is just selfish and childish. That totally isn’t creepy and has nothing at all to do with making women abide by a rigid set of gender roles. Totally not.

    • cpcwatcher

      Thanks for that one, PR.  Made me smile. 

      • wendy-banks

        Yep, me too! You go Princess Rot!

  • rebellious-grrl

    I really appreciated reading you response to the article in Newsweek. I think is key and will quote you in the future on this,

    We have also evolved in our understanding of feminism in general. The second-wavers who founded NARAL and NOW paved the way for us to have and protect the legal right to abortion, but what of the personal ability? My generation has seen legal abortion fail countless times as Roe gets hammered away at, and we have seen what happens when access is limited. My generation is one that has began to take into account the racial differences within reproductive issues, and we are beginning to mainstream discussions about reproductive justice: a far cry from wealthy white women not wanting to have babies, we see that, throughout history, women of color have been coerced into not having babies. We’ve begun to recognize that access to abortion is tangled up in a web of restriction in all matters reproductive, from contraception to abortion, from coerced sterilization to birthing options.

    It’s important to remember that it’s not just about abortion, but about reproductive freedom. Women will never reach full equality until we can control our own bodies.

     

    Yours in solidarity.

  • pheasantweber

    Loved the post! Don’t let the negative comments get ya down. I sure get my fill of them.