Roundup: What Will Brown Do For You?


Yes, it’s over.  Scott Brown is senator-elect from the state of Massachusetts (Trust me, I’m from Minnesota.  I know ALL about proper terminology for a senator that has won the election but has yet to be sworn in.) Anti-abortion groups across the nation are cheering the victory of their new standard bearer.  But once they get to know him, will there be any buyers remorse?

According to Catholic News Agency, Brown’s victory over his Democratic challenger Martha Coakley was in effect a win FOR women.

Several prominent pro-life leaders are responding to Scott Brown’s
Senate victory in Massachusetts last night, with one saying that
Brown’s success is a “win” for American women.

Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the pro-life political action
group Susan B. Anthony List said on Wednesday that “The election of
Scott Brown is no accident,” and that “The American people have spoken
tonight.”

“Martha Coakley’s defeat is not a setback for women in politics, it is a victory,” the SBA List president said.

She went on to call Scott Brown’s success “a win for the majority of
American women who demand authentic representation that reflects
commonsense pro-life views, like abortion funding restrictions and
conscience protections.”

“Abortion is never good for women,” Dannenfelser asserted , “and it
should never be a legitimate aspect of any ‘health care’ debate.”

However, as the Washington Post reminds us, Brown really isn’t an anti-abortion candidate, and abortion really had little to do with his election.

Ron Kaufman, the longtime Republican National Committee member from
Massachusetts, said that "it was a perfect storm" that made it
possible.

"We had a really good candidate," Kaufman said. "A military veteran,
a family guy, a fiscal conservative, moderate on social issues, a
pro-choice Catholic. But it was bigger than that. The Democrats didn’t
understand that people here are very upset with the way things are
going in Washington, just as they are elsewhere. They see big sums
being spent, big deficits piling up, and they want to send a message."

In fact, he had a tendancy to waver when actually supporting some key anti-choice legislation.

He once proposed an amendment which would have allowed emergency room
doctors to deny emergency contraception to rape victims based on the
doctor’s religious beliefs, which drew the ire of fellow Republicans.
But, Brown voted for the final version of the bill without the
amendment. 

Some columnists are already warning the right that their newest poster boy might not be the all they were hoping for.

Scott Brown will join the Senate’s small abortion rights Republican
caucus — he supports Roe v. Wade, though he also backs some
restrictions on abortion — but his win is still being welcomed by a
long list of anti-abortion groups, whose statements you can read here.

“Martha Coakley’s extreme embrace of abortion may have endeared her to
EMILY’s List and the abortion lobby, but it did little to win votes
today," said Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser,
rubbing in the defeat in a race that Coakley tried to make about
reproductive rights.

There’s a limit to this, of course: Brown shares far more with
Coakley than with Dannenfelser, as far as his positions go, and his
defense wasn’t to reassert anti-abortion values — it was that he
supports abortion rights.

I guess we will see how long the anti-choice activists enjoy their newest addition.

 

Mini Roundup: This is how to talk about abortion. This is how to not talk about abortion.  Better luck next time, Sen. Hutchison.

 

January 21, 2010

 

Turning
a blind eye to
abortion
stats?
Chicago
Daily Herald

Kline’s
questionable actions resurface
Kansas City Star

The Abortion
Answer
Texas
Tribune

NARAL
Va. Investigates Pro-Life Pregancy Centers
WAMU

 

January 20, 2010

Roe
v. Wade anniversary to be marked with flags
Coshocton Tribune

At
84,
pro-life
leader and March for Life pioneer Nellie Gray marches on
Catholic San Francisco

Pro-life
leaders cheer Brown’s win over Coakley

Catholic News Agency

CBS
Agrees To Air
Pro-Life
Focus on the Family Superbowl Spot

Huffington Post

Pro-Life is
a misdirection
Amador
Ledger-Dispatch

2010
Pro-Life
Marches Take on New Significance
Christian Post

Idea
of the Day: Integrate Reproductive Health Services and
Family Planning
Center For American Progress

Sugar-coated
lie
Daily
Pioneer

Canada
fast-tracks
adoptions of
Haiti children
AFP

New adoptions in
Haiti must stop: British charities

AFP

Brown
record doesn’t always match everyman image
Washington Post

Virginia
Pro-Abortion Group Attacks Pregnancy Centers Helping Pregnant Women
LifeNews.com

Entering
the
Abortion
Debate at Notre Dame
TIME

Anti-abortion
groups welcome Brown
Politico

Law
and Order Actors Pitch
Abortion in Health Care for Planned
Parenthood Video
LifeNews.com

Pro Choice,
Anti Abortion Groups To Square Off By Ferry Building Saturday
The San Francisco Appeal

Massachusetts
election is a wake-up call for Democrats
Washington Post

Stupak
is Back: Why Abortion Will Be A Key Issue as Health Care Reform Moves
Newsweek

 

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with contact director of communications Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

Follow Robin Marty on twitter: @robinmarty

  • progo35

    Whatever Brown’s position is, I know it’s better than Martha Coakly’s who supported abortion at any stage payed for by the tax payer and didn’t respect the conscience rights of healthcare providers. Even if he is pro choice, I would rather have someone who was somewhat pro choice in charge than someone who was militantly pro choice.

    "Well behaved women seldom make history."-Laurel Thatcher Ulrich