Fostering Success


The noted poet and author Maya Angelou eloquently and
poignantly stated that "children’s talents to endure stems from their
ignorance of alternatives."
I could not agree more. The capacity of young people to persevere, even under the most adverse conditions, never ceases to amaze me. If we as a nation are to break the cycle of poverty, crime and the growing underclass of young people ill equipped to be productive citizens, we cannot ignore our most vulnerable youth.

There are approximately 500,000 young people in foster care
in the U.S., most of whom suffered severe physical, sexual, and emotional abuse and neglect at the hands of family member. These young people are at a greater risk of an early pregnancy. Nearly half of the girls in foster care become
pregnant by age 19.

Children born to teens have less supportive and stimulating
environments, poorer health, lower cognitive development, and worse educational
outcomes. Children of teen mothers are at increased risk of being in foster
care and becoming teen parents themselves, thereby repeating the cycle.

We at the Georgia Campaign for Adolescent Pregnancy
Prevention,
an organization I founded in 1995, are committed to eliminating
adolescent pregnancy in Georgia and hope that our relentless campaign sets an
example for the entire nation. One of our stalwart programs is the G-CAPP
Second Chance Homes Network (SCH), established in 2001 to provide safe and
stable housing to teen mothers, many of whom are in the state foster care
system.

Before we started the SCH network, there were only 10 beds
in the entire state available for a teen mother in need of a safe living
environment. Now, thanks to the generous investment of the Georgia Department
of Human Resources, G-CAPP operates 11 homes throughout the state with 58 beds
for teen mothers and their children. We have helped over 400 teen mothers with their children. The
overarching goal of SCH is to build strong families and break the cycle of
persistent poverty and dependency associated with teen childbearing. From our
experience, the challenges facing this particular group of adolescents are
daunting and pronounced.

Fortunately, our SCH Network is transforming the lives of
each young mother and her child who stays in the homes. With love, dignity, and
hope we empower young mothers to take ownership of their lives. Evaluation
findings of our SCH Network have consistently shown that providing a safe and
supportive living environment for teen mothers and their children can help
mothers stay free of repeat teen pregnancies, stay in school, rebuild
relationships with their families and the fathers of their children, learn and
practice parenting and life skills, and make better life choices.

Two years after leaving the program, 63 percent of teens age
18 and over were employed. Most important, only 16 percent of the mothers
became pregnant again with about half of the births occurring when the mother
was 20 years old or older.

Simply put, we are creating solutions for young women who
want to be great parents, citizens and role models. Think of it, young women
who did not have a stable family of their own are now matriarchs of their own
families, breaking the cycle of abuse, neglect, low education attainment and
poverty.

With so much talk about teen pregnancy prevention at the
federal level, I hope special consideration will be given to children in the
foster care system. Investing in the prevention of early parenthood can save
our country billions of dollars annually. It is estimated that teen
childbearing cost the child welfare system at least 2.3 billion dollars in 2004
alone. Imagine reinvesting that money into the future of our young people by
preventing teen pregnancy, increasing graduation rates in the U.S. and
preparing our young people to lead this country into the 21st
century equipped with skills necessary to stay competitive in the fast changing
global market. There are no more tomorrows. We have to act today. Our young
people are assets to be cultivated and nurtured, let’s begin treating them that
way.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with contact director of communications Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • paul-bradford

    Children born to teens have less supportive and stimulating environments, poorer health, lower cognitive development, and worse educational outcomes. Children of teen mothers are at increased risk of being in foster care and becoming teen parents themselves, thereby repeating the cycle.

     

    There are far too many impoverished, neglected and abused children as it is.  We don’t need more.

     

    One way to approach the problem is to do nothing.  Pregnant young women who do not want to give birth to one more impoverished, neglected and abused child will figure out how to get an abortion.  Problem solved!  Well, it’s solved if you think that people’s problems can be solved by eliminating people.

     

    Another way to approach the problem is to do the kinds of things that Jane highlighted in this article.  If we want to protect young women from unwanted birth we ought to protect them from unwanted pregnancy.  African American women (who are disproportionately among the disadvantaged) have abortion rates that are five times the rate of white women.  I’ll bet someone has already pointed that out to you.  What I bet you DON’T realize is that African American women have a birth (fertility) rate that’s higher than white women as well.

     

    If abortion is the problem, the ‘problem behind the problem’ is unwanted pregnancy.  We have to do more than explain to young girls how a condom works — we have to actually do the kinds of things that will make their lives better! 

     

    Paul Bradford

    Pro-Life Catholics for Choice

  • crowepps

    There are approximately 500,000 young people in foster care in the U.S., most of whom suffered severe physical, sexual, and emotional abuse and neglect at the hands of family member.

    Evaluation findings of our SCH Network have consistently shown that providing a safe and supportive living environment for teen mothers and their children can help mothers stay free of repeat teen pregnancies, stay in school, rebuild relationships with their families and the fathers of their children, learn and practice parenting and life skills, and make better life choices.

    If the first statement is true and these young women have “suffered severe physical, sexual, and emotional abuse and neglect at the hands of family members” then I find it a little hard to understand why one of the goals is “rebuild relationships with their families”. What is the benefit to them of reestablishing contact with their toxic family? Doesn’t this expose their children to the possibility of those same family members inflicting “severe physical, sexual, and emotional abuse and neglect” on the next generation?