Angry But Not Surprised About Stupak


I want to be happy that the
House passed its version of Health Care Reform. Really. I believe so
strongly about making health care a right not a privilege.

But the House version included a last minute amendment — the Pitt-Stupak
amendment — which if included in the final law, will basically mean
that any insurance company who wants to be part of the federal program
will not be able to include abortion as a covered service. If passed,
it’s the greatest restriction on women’s access to abortion since the
Hyde Amendment passed more than two decades ago.

I feel betrayed. Betrayed by the 64 Democrats who voted for it. Betrayed by Nancy Pelosi
who let it be brought to the floor. Betrayed by those in the pro-choice
community who asked too early for us to get behind the Capps
amendment which would have continued to deny women who needed abortion
coverage in the public option but was ‘abortion neutral’. We gave up
too much ground too soon. And angry that our pro-choice President was
willing to go along with trading the rights of women to get anti-choice
legislators to go along with it, despite the fact that not a single
Republican actually voted yes on health care reform.

I can’t say
that I’m surprised. I’ve been writing for more than the past two years
about my concern about religious leaders who call themselves
progressive but don’t support LGBT rights or the rights of women to
make their own decisions about their pregnancies. I’ve continually
called for sexual justice to be an integral part of a progressive
religious agenda. I’ve been asked far too many times to stop raising
these issues, to recognize that they are divisive to a common ground
agenda, that reaching out to Catholics and evangelical leaders is more
important than working for justice to LGBT persons and women. I can’t
count how many times I’ve written here — and in other articles — that
women’s and LGBT’s lives shouldn’t be traded for political gains.

Some
of those so-called progressive folks helped deliver health care reform
in the House — but they did it at the expense of hundreds of thousands
of women who will now have even a more difficult time accessing safe
abortion services. Removing abortion from covered insurance plans won’t
keep women from having abortions — it will just mean that they happen
later in pregnancies as women struggle to find the money to pay for
them — or they will resort once again to unsafe procedures.

The
bottom line: women’s lives got buried under common ground on Saturday
night. And to those who said the religious right was dead, I wish it
felt better to say, "I told you so."

 

http://www.religiousinstitute.org/sexuality-and-religion

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with contact director of communications Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

Follow ReligiousInstitute on twitter: @ReligiousInst RevDebra

  • emmetti

    I do understand your sentiments and I am a supporter of your beliefs.Let us just hope that this bill, will benefit many people and help many lives. We are just ordinary people, the only thing that we can do is to voice our opinion and make them hear our pleads. let us just pray that they will hear us. the government has a lot of problems to deal with. They must do it very soon. People talk about the average credit limit on cards being too high, and encourages irresponsible spending – but that pales in comparison to the limit on U.S. debt. U.S. debt is record high, and the American government is staring down the barrel of a $1.2 TRILLION debt load, for this fiscal year alone. Legislators have imposed a limit on things – no more borrowing after we hit about $12 trillion in debt – but keep in mind that as of now, an estimated 90% of our GDP is debt – which means that for every dollar that exists, about 90 cents of it is owed to someone else. We need U.S. debt relief, and we need it in a hurry.

  • kw114

    “And angry that our pro-choice President was
    willing to go along with trading the rights of women to get anti-choice
    legislators to go along with it, despite the fact that not a single
    Republican actually voted yes on health care reform.”

    There was one republican that voted yes: Rep. Ahn “Joseph” Cao.