What Is the Message From This Election? Ultraconservatives Are Emboldened


It’s  often
useless to draw sweeping conclusions from any off-year or special
election.  Turnout can be a little
wacky (for example, it was much lower in VA than in 2008), and is often
dominated by older and high-frequency voters.  At this writing, all the data aren’t in, so it’s too early to
delve too deeply into whether or how to project voter sentiment onto the course of future
elections.

That said, I believe that for supporters of reproductive
rights and justice, there is one important take-away from yesterday’s elections: 
ultra-conservatives are emboldened
.  It has nothing to do with trends—it’s now a reality.

What will this mean?

First,  we will see more challenges in Republican primaries.  Despite losing the election in NY-23, conservatives
feel they took down a traitor, pro-choice Republican Dede Scozzafava.  She was even considered by some to be more liberal than the Democrat,
though both she and Owens were pro-choice. Already, right-wing activists and tea-baggers,
led by FreedomWorks’ chair and former GOP House majority leader Dick Armey, are
preparing to challenge Republican candidates in more than a dozen House and
Senate races in 2010." "What you’re going to see," said Armey,
"is moderates
and conservatives across the country in primaries."

It’s not just those anti-tax, socialist-fearing
FreedomWorks folks, but anti-choice activists who feel buoyed by the election.  The Susan B. Anthony List, which
supports anti-choice women candidates, teamed up with the National Organization
for Marriage to mobilize votes for Conservative Party Candidate Doug
Hoffman.  They spent
$142,000 in the race,
including $11,000 in bundled contributions from organization members and sent nine
field staffers to the district.
Their reason for this
investment?  The road to a GOP
majority is not paved with taxpayer-funded abortion, same-sex marriage and
government-run healthcare
."

Neither FreedomWorks nor SBA care that a House seat that
has been in Republican hands for more than 100 years is now held by a
Democrat.  They would rather see a
Democrat than a moderate Republican hold the seat.  One scenario that could result is that these emboldened
ultra-conservatives and the moderates keep fighting amongst themselves,
nominating unelectable candidates in races across the country. 
Will what is left of moderate Republicans disappear?  Is that a good or a bad thing?

But this brings me to my other main concern about this
bolder, more visible ultra-conservative push.  How will elected Democrats react?   In the same breath that they were trumpeting their
so-called success, SBA used their election work to warn Congress about health
care:  “Such success should serve
as a cautionary tale to Congress and the White House, whose overreach on health
care could experience a similar demise.”  This of course is referring, in part at least, as “no
abortion coverage in health care.”

A problematic scenario that could result is that moderate Democrats,
too many of whom are already weak-in-the-spine on abortion rights,  will use this as an excuse to throw
reproductive health under the bus—on health care coverage and beyond.  This is avoidable if Democrats actually
look at real data.  Exit polls show that NJ and VA elections were dominated by bread-and-butter issues of
economy and jobs, health care, and taxes. 
There is no need to begin compromising on issues like reproductive
health in an attempt to placate voters.

It’s also avoidable if we can re-energize our base,
especially pro-choice and pro-health care women.   Noted, it’s hard to motivate a base through
compromise, or when our president is shying away from reproductive rights so
publicly.  But just as our
opponents are openly partnering with anti-gay marriage groups, we can form
partnerships with LGBT and other progressive partners to create a broader,
motivated core of advocates who can hold pro-choice officials accountable
before and after election day.

Only time will tell how this new phase of
ultra-conservatism among Republicans will play out over the next year.  What do you predict–and how
should pro-choice, pro-reproductive justice advocates prepare and respond to
increased pressure from the teabag wing of the Republican party?

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with Margaret Conway please contact Communications Director Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • kater7

    What we need to know is that we can’t be lazy – voter turnout is important…and everyone (not just the conservatives!) needs to get out there and vote!

  • edward-craig

    You should see challengers coming out of the woodwork for both parties. Lots of primary challengers promised for 2010 to Blue Dogs as well as to RINOs. Both extremes are mobilizing.

    I wonder whether the next second party can arise out of the middle.

  • margaret-conway

    kater7: I agree that turnout is essential, but one of the challenges on the pro-choice side is getting voters out.  It seems that the anti-choice folks are more motivated (and will vote single issue). 

    One of my big questions is how we can work with other issues and movements to motivate younger Obama voters (or keep them motivated) since they seem to have stayed home in this past election.

    • kater7

      Yes, I know – I wish we could figure out a way…it seems to be some sort of apathy…or ignorance about how dangerous it can be to not vote.

  • mrsyrt19

    videolar Emeginize saglık….
    Video
    Ncfor
    Youtube
    İzlesene
    Video izle