Our Little Wizards Are All Grown Up

Critics reviewing the latest installment in the wildly popular Harry Potter franchise have been distracted to no end by the spell of attraction that has been added into the magic mix.  They can’t get over the fact that the films’ three young stars, once gawky misfits, are now good-looking young adults worthy of cover shots.  And it’s true: in the sixth book and film, Harry, Hermione, Ron and sundry others are caught up in a tangled web of hormones and confusion.  They have to figure out where making out (or "snogging") can fit into their schedule of conquering evil, saving the world and puzzling out the cryptic, possibly universe-altering, intentions of the adults around them.

What’s fascinating about the rather gentle sexification of the characters–and it would certainly be weird if it they remained chaste, let’s be honest–is mostly how it brings out the anxieties in their muggle (human) observers.  A number of reviewers have been particularly put off by the lovely and lithe Emma Watson, who plays brainiac Hermione, complaining that her good looks make it impossible to accept her character’s nerdy persona.  It’s as though we live in a society where women aren’t supposed to be sexy and sharply intelligent at the same time–oh wait, we do live in that society.  Indeed, those who aren’t complaining about Watson’s sexuality are exploiting it, as the stories from her 18th birthday, when the paparazzi decided she was "fair game," demonstrate.

But both the folks crying foul and salivating over Hermione’s good looks ought to go back to the source material and feel thoroughly ashamed of themselves.  JK Rowling may not be perfect in terms of writing gender roles, but she does a great job illustrating how Hermione’s intellectual assertiveness blinds the men around her to her growing attractiveness. In the fourth book, when Hermione dresses up in a gown, the boys who are her best friends literally don’t recognize her because they’ve de-sexualized her.  That’s why Hermione’s blossoming, and the other characters’ eventual acceptance of her as both brilliant and womanly, has made her into a patron saint for girl geeks around the world who want to be proud of who they are without being pigeonholed as asexual.

On the other end of the spectrum from the hand-wringing, we have those who lament the lack of "real" sexuality and depth in Rowling’s depiction of romantic love.  Alyssa Rosenberg wrote last week:

First, in Rowling’s universe, everyone ends up with their first real love, and I mean everyone…There is not a single example in the entire series of a serious relationship that does not end in marriage or life-long devotion.

Second, Rowling never gives readers a single detailed description of an adult sexual relationship.

The problem with her interpretation is that Rowling is writing within a specific genre–young-reader fantasy–that always uses kissing as shorthand for sex and features characters forming deep, life-long attachments at early ages (well, except for pious C.S. Lewis who locked his one sexual female character out of heaven as punishment. But that’s another story.)  Go back and think about books like A Wrinkle in Time or His Dark Materials to see those conventions at work; even Twilight uses biting as an allegory for sex, never showing its characters doing more than lie together kissing until they’re legally wed. In this kind of fantasy novel, sexual maturation is often expressed under the surface, as characters accompany each other on perilous but necessary journeys involving unbearable tension and an uncertain fate, a metaphor for both coming-of-age and falling in love.

Given that Rowling is trying to keep the very young age of some of her readers in mind while also enticing adults, I’d say she and film-maker Richard Yates in turn manage that balancing act incredibly well.  They focus on the feelings produced by budding sexuality: the shock felt by teenagers who suddenly discover their romantic inclinations, and the self-consciousness of teens weighing those desires with social expectations.   In this latest installment Ron is torn between his surface attraction to the very amorous Lavender–and the social status having a girlfriend conveys–and his deeper, more confusing feelings towards Hermione. Hermione is smart enough to recognize her own feelings for Ron, but also angry at herself for caring so much about a boy who seems so clueless.  She resorts to flirting with an arrogant jock to make him jealous.  And Harry has woken up to his affection for Ron’s sister Ginny after years of being amused by her unrequited crush on him–but now she’s moved on.  And he knows that even if he did win her back, he’d alienate his best friend.

The truth is, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince contains a few basic, poignant truths about teenage psychological development: the conflict of individual desires with group rules, the heightened electricity of previously platonic friendships, the exploration of relationships that are more sexual than emotional to see what they’re like, and the sheer ridiculous awkwardness of it all.  Sure, if necking couples in the enchanted halls of Hogwarts were real teenagers they might be experimenting more explicitly and risking pregnancy and disease–but on the other hand real teenagers don’t face hexes and deadly potions.  Real teenagers aren’t doomed to face down the Dark Lord in a final confrontation that will leave one of them dead, either. So perhaps the real and fictional perils pretty much even out. Rowling leaves in enough joking hints about the juicy stuff to satisfy her grown-up fans and provide fodder for erotic fanfic, but she does it subtly enough not to confuse the kids, which is quite a feat.

But all that juggling on her part is in the service of something bigger. Another prevalent theme of YA novels besides budding romance is the inevitability of death, and the two themes are often quite intentionally paired by authors as a way of teaching characters and readers alike about the bittersweet nature of the human life cycle.  Rowling, as many have said, is very much part of this tradition.  Throughout the Harry Potter books but most pointedly in the last few, Rowling is preparing her young characters to understand both love and death.  She has them learn that love can’t conquer death but it can transcend death, a piece of wisdom that will help them face their entrance into the wider world with courage.  This may not involve sex education, but it’s the ultimate lesson about growing up, a lesson even jaded adult readers have been all-too-happy to absorb from Harry’s tale.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact press@rhrealitycheck.org.

Follow Sarah Seltzer on twitter: @sarahmseltzer

  • invalid-0

    Thanks! I’m a huge HP fan. My oldest son was 11 when the first book came out, and we’ve followed them together.

    I tend to ignore the critics, but I’m sure that the love and “snogging” J.K. Rowling wrote about is just the latest in a long line of things that humorless or unimaginative folks can find to complain about. Nuts to them.

  • invalid-0

    My concern with Hermione was that they had to prettify her. It wasn’t that Harry and Ron had “desexualized” her, it was that she had frizzy hair and buck teeth and kicked everyone’s ass, anyway. Imagine my disappointment when she made it on screen and suddenly she was sleek haired, with a perfect smile. The message I got was that it wasn’t enough to be “the cleverest witch of her age,” she had to be pretty, too. Well, damn. (True, she does sometimes decide that hey, she wants to be pretty today and she is gorgeous at the Yule Ball, but there was almost no change between normal, every day Hermione and dolled up Hermione, thereby sort-of missing the point, if you ask me.)

    Why does frizzy haired and frumpy have to mean she was “pigeon holed as asexual”? Does “sexual” have to mean “pretty”?

  • invalid-0

    I’m glad to read a well thought out article about this subject. After reading half a dozen articles from every point in the spectrum I started wondering if those people watched the same movie I did! There were people who even picked apart every scene and inserted all sorts of context that just wasn’t there, included homoerotic subtext that was way off base. Apparently guys can’t have a friendship that involves more than grunting and playing sports, and talking about their feelings must obviously mean they dig each other… Sigh. Anyway, this really echoes exactly what I was thinking and I’m glad you put this out there!

  • invalid-0

    But the homoerotic subtext between Malfoy and Harry was so obvious in the book! It’s a shame that they toned the sectumsempra scene down in the films, the blood all over the water was so beautiful.

    Also, slash is… all over the place, in all fandoms. Rule 34.

  • invalid-0

    “Does ‘sexual’ have to mean ‘pretty’?”
    THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU, this is EXACTLY my problem with the way female sexuality gets portrayed. Are my feelings for men any less valid on the day I wear sweatpants and sneakers than on the day I get all glammed up? It’s like female sexuality can never be about a woman feeling desire, only about a woman being an object of desire. It always rubbed me the wrong way.

  • http://simmeringdarkness.blogspot.com/ invalid-0

    I too have often wondered at the Hermione dynamic. I always assumed that Ron and Harry didn’t see her as a sexual being not because of her intellegence but rather because she was “one of the guys”, that being the nature of their friendship. But then when the Yule Ball rolled around, a light went off for Ron when other guys started to notice Hermione. She has always been one of my favorite sci-fi/ fantasy characters, because she is so multi-demensional. Ron and Harry’s reactions to her are both very different and both very realistic.

    Kudos on the great article.

  • invalid-0

    I’m not sure they considered her “one of the guys”, so much as just another best friend. If you look at the very first book, Ron and Harry weren’t friends with Hermione at the beginning because she was a “know-it-all”, a fact that would have bugged them had she been a girl or a boy. However, the turning point in their relationship comes when the trio encounters their very first life or death situation together (confronting a troll). I don’t have the book in front of me, but Rowling wrote something to the effect of, ‘You can’t go through that and NOT end up friends on’. Thus, she was just a part of the puzzle of love and friendship defeating hatred and evil, starting with the troll. The underlying tension between Ron and Hermione begins in that first book, because Ron has a much bigger issue with Hermione’s “annoying” intelligence than Harry does; he argues more with her, gets more annoyed at her, and has more passionate reactions to her in general than Harry does. I knew when I read the first book in 4th grade that there was something between them, because that’s what 11 year old boys and girls do when they “like” each other: they make fun of each other, argue more, and act like they don’t like each other… I would know, I was that 11 year old :-)

  • invalid-0

    First, in Rowling’s universe, everyone ends up with their first real love, and I mean everyone…There is not a single example in the entire series of a serious relationship that does not end in marriage or life-long devotion.

    Really? What about Snape? How can he possibly end up with Harry’s mother (who is dead!) Or is there some massive spoiler from not reading the books that I’m unaware of?

  • invalid-0

    ^^ that’s why she added the “life long devotion”.

  • invalid-0
  • invalid-0

    Now you’re over-sexualizing teenagers by saying that kissing is “always” a shorthand for sex in books like these. It’s not good to go to extremes in either direction. They’re only in high school. I didn’t have my first kiss till my senior year of high school, and was halfway into my freshman year of college before I did anything else. That may not be typical, but I know a number of other people that didn’t even have their first kiss until college. While I haven’t read the other series, which yes, may have idealized versions of ending up forever with your first love, sometimes a kiss is just a kiss. Don’t assume that all kids rush things. You’ll end up making those who don’t rush feel inadequate because they’re not.