Removal of Ban on Needle Exchange Faces Opposition


Last Friday, House Appropriations Committee Chair David Obey (D-WI), took the first — and courageous — step toward ending the 20-year ban on federal funding of needle exchange.

For two decades now, a culture war has taken place, one pitting science against ideology and public health against politics. This prohibition has done nothing but impede efforts to address the global HIV/AIDS crisis. In its markup of the Labor-HHS-Education spending bill, the Subcommittee removed the ban on federal funding of needle exchange programs (NEPs).

Lifting the ban provides greater options for States and local jurisdictions that require new and effective tools to prevent the spread of HIV. The ban equips those on the front lines to decide if, how, and where they want to implement syringe access and disposal services.

Though the ban language was first introduced in 1988, evidence in support of funding NEPs has been piling up since well before 1998, when then Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala and Surgeon General David Satcher detailed the effectiveness of these programs. Research has proven that needle exchange programs:

1)Reduce HIV transmission;

2)Do NOT increase drug use;

3)Provide entry points for drug treatment and other support services; and

4)Do NOT increase local crime rates.

The World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations coordinating authority on international public health, has also indicated similar findings.

Domestic and International Support

There are a host of domestic and international organizations and agencies that support NEPs including: the WHO, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), American Medical Association (AMA), American Public Health Association (APHA), American Bar Association (ABA), and National Institutes on Drug Abuse (NIDA), among others. For a longer list of supporting organizations, check out this link from House Government Oversight and Reform Committee.

Drug Czar Support

In April 2009, Gil Kerlikowske, former Seattle Police Chief and the new Director of the White House Office of Drug Control Policy, responded to Congressional questions regarding national needle exchange policy. He stated:

“Needle exchange programs have been proven to reduce the transmission of blood borne diseases. A number of studies conducted in the U.S. have shown needle exchange programs do not increase drug use. I understand that research has shown these programs when implemented in the context of a comprehensive program that offers other services such as referral to counseling, healthcare, drug treatment, HIV/AIDS Prevention, counseling and testing are effective at connecting addicted users to drug treatment.”

Opposition Aims to Sustain Culture War

Health experts almost universally agree that NEPs reduce transmission of HIV and protect not only drug users but also the general population. Unfortunately, some members of Congress still refuse to accept the overwhelming scientific evidence. They are mounting opposition to removing the federal ban. The Washington Post recently reported Ranking Sub-committee Member Todd Tiahrt (R-KS) as saying,

"I am very concerned that we would use federal tax dollars to support the drug habits of people who desperately need help."

In 1998, Former Surgeon General David Satcher warned,

“One of the worst things that can happen in this country is for us to say, if the science doesn’t agree with our perspective, then we want to suppress the science.’’

Representative Tiahrt and others on the opposition are doing just that. They are blatantly ignoring the evidence and preparing to wage yet another battle in the culture war. As the legislation moves through Congress – maybe as early as this Friday (July 17th) — they will try to restore the ban to the bill and sustain the status quo which has until now hampered a more comprehensive response to the HIV/AIDS crisis, domestically and abroad. Undoubtedly, the opposition’s anachronistic anti-harm-reduction ideology has contributed to the rapid spread of the HIV epidemic. Needle sharing is a highly efficient form of HIV transmission, and the practice has led to explosive epidemics throughout our country and around the globe.

The HIV pandemic continues to grow exponentially among populations in Eastern Europe and Central and South-East Asia, where it is largely driven by unsafe injection practices. Studies in cities around the world have shown that without adequate harm-reduction polices and programs, HIV prevalence rates can rise among drug users to as high as 90% in a very short period of time. Importantly, HIV also spreads sexually beyond drug user networks, infecting non-injecting partners.

Stepping Up to Meet the Challenge

We can no longer afford to waste time. With PEPFAR, we have made significant progress in global HIV prevention and treatment in heavily AIDS-burdened nations. Yet, we still live in a world where, for every 2 individuals treated for HIV, 5 more become infected. Federally-funded needle exchange programs will help curb HIV transmission in the injecting drug user community and reduce the risk of new infections among everyone.

Thankfully, Chairman Obey took the first steps in support of this rights- and science-based prevention method last week. Yet, indications that Representative Tiahrt and his cohort will try to reintroduce the ban language into the spending bill even this week are of great concern. 

Who will get through to the opposition? Who will tell them that we need to break from politics as usual? We each must do our part to ensure Chairman Obey’s efforts are not in vain. We have an unprecedented opportunity to persuade our legislators to vote for long overdue change. Call members of the Appropriations Committee at 202-224-3121 today.

Call:

(1) Committee Members: Ask them to support Chairman Obey’s efforts and request that they vote against any amendment to the Labor, Health and Human Services Appropriations bill that would reinstate the federal ban or put further restrictions on syringe exchange. Conclude with Clean Needles Save Lives!

(2) Chairman Obey: Thank him for his commitment to ending the 20-year prohibition on this vital, science-based harm-reduction method. For more information syringe exchange programs and materials for advocacy, please visit Harm Reduction Coalition: Syringe Access.

Make your calls today and spread the word.  Lives depend on you.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with contact director of communications Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • crowepps

    Oh, geez — we don’t want to ‘encourage drug addicts’. Drug addicts who shoot up are literally willing to kill themselves to feed their addiction. They know that because they see their buddies drop over dead. These people have absolutely NO connection with any idea of being ‘encouraged’ or ‘discouraged’ by government programs. The idea of this program is to keep the side effects of their addictions like HIV status from spreading their diseases to the rest of us before they finally kill themselves.

    If the Senators REALLY want to do something about addicts, they might try fully funding the necessary treatment programs, which currently are so understaffed there is an average waiting period of almost SIX MONTHS.

  • http://www.englishlci.com/esl-classes.html invalid-0

    I can’t believe there are still people out there who think needle exchange increases drug use and crime!