Proposed Hospital Buyout Could Limit Reproductive, End-of-Life Care

contentious transfer of two Colorado-based Exempla hospitals to a
Catholic health care network is likely to further shrink comprehensive
health care services for Denver-area patients because they violate
church doctrine.

Local patients seeking reproductive health care or termination of
invasive life support could soon face health care professionals
invoking conscience clauses, should the transfer of Exempla Lutheran
Hospital in Wheat Ridge and Exempla Good Samaritan Hospital in
Lafayette to the Kansas-based Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health
System be approved.


As the Denver Business Journal reported over the weekend, an arbitrator blocked the sale of the Exempla hospitals
by the Arvada-based Community First Foundation to the Sisters of
Charity over a legal technicality. But the actual transfer of
operational control of the facilities, which are jointly owned in a
complex membership agreement between the two organizations, continues
to move forward albeit without the $311 million buyout windfall to the

Arbitrator William Meyer ruled Friday in a binding decision that the Sisters of Charity cannot buy the foundation’s stake in the two hospitals
according to the Exempla bylaws that govern the membership agreement
between the two organizations that founded the Exempla system in 1997
from the ashes of two Lutheran hospitals.

The Exempla board filed suit in 2008 to block the sale citing, in
part, concerns over that non-sectarian medical policies would be
discontinued under a Roman Catholic health care system.

Issues of religious doctrinal interference in physician-patient
decision making came to a head in 2007 when Gov. Bill Ritter signed a
law requiring hospitals and pharmacies to provide sexual assault victims information about emergency contraception.
A conscience clause was added to the bill that provides a right for
health care providers who object on moral grounds to opt out. Likewise,
during the 2009 legislative session, Catholic church lobbying forced a more narrow legal definition of contraception
in the state’s landmark Birth Control Protection Act to exclude
mifespristone, also known as RU-486, and other federally approved
pharmaceuticals that induce abortion.

However, none of those safeguards are in place for other
reproductive health services, like sterilization or abortion, or in
end-of-life care procedures that require the removal of feeding tubes
or ventilators.

Currently, Catholic health organizations currently operate 11 hospitals and a dozen skilled nursing, hospice and outpatient facilities in Colorado.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

For more information or to schedule an interview with contact

  • invalid-0

    Correct leaving and protection of reproductive system is the higher display of care of the woman about itself.

    The matter is that any pharmacological means has collateral actions. By-effects of hormonal contraceptives are described in the medical literature, but are unknown to general public. In summaries applied on these preparations and in advertising their advantages, often doubtful are mentioned only. Meanwhile at use of hormonal contraceptives there are numerous complications which transform the healthy woman in fruitless and sick.
    Now there is variety of the publications, containing data on real consequences of use of the hormonal contraceptives, received as a result of scientific researches. In some countries there have passed successful litigations against manufacturers of hormonal contraceptives. Nevertheless «a preparation Approaching for you the doctor» will help to pick up an advertising stamp operates magically, maintaining your trust to the doctor.