Surge in Need Taxes Abortion Funds


The New
York Abortion Access Fund
,
an all-volunteer organization that provides funds for women who can’t
afford the abortions they need, is going broke, literally. In recent
months, we have received a record number of calls from low-income women
and health clinics representing them asking for our help to pay for
their abortions and our eight-woman board is struggling to raise funds
fast enough to keep up with the demand. Last week, NYAAF‘s assets dipped below $3000. If
current trends continue, as we suspect they will, that may not last
through the end of the month.

Since its inception in 2001, NYAAF has given out over $100,000, nearly
half of it in the last year alone. We suspect two factors have led to
the dramatic increase in requests for our funding. First, our visibility
has increased. Though NYAAF began as New York City’s abortion
fund, it is also one of few resources in the state for low-income women
who need but cannot afford an abortion. Over the past year, NYAAF has reached out to health care providers
beyond the five boroughs, asking abortion clinics throughout the state
of New York not to turn away patients who lack the funds for their procedures,
but to call us instead. The result has led to greater access to abortion
services for low-income women outside of New York City. It also means
we are giving out more money than ever before.

The second, and considerably more dramatic, factor driving women to
call NYAAF is the global economic downturn. The
Associated Press reported
recently
that financial
troubles make it more difficult for women to purchase birth control
to avoid unintended pregnancies and to obtain timely abortions if they
do become pregnant. Not having enough money means women facing unintended
pregnancies wait longer to have abortions as they scrounge to raise
funds. And waiting longer means more complicated, more expensive procedures
and an even greater need for funds like NYAAF

Indeed, the women and clinic staff we speak to each week cite fundraising
as a major barrier to booking appointments for earlier and less expensive
procedures. Consequently, the number of women calling us in their 22nd,
23rd and even 24th week of pregnancy has increased.
While helping women obtain later term procedures is not new for NYAAF-New York has long served as a safe
haven for women seeking abortions from other states with more restrictive
abortion policies-these procedures are expensive and, along with an
overall increase in requests for NYAAF assistance, have rapidly drained our
funds.  

For those of us fielding calls
from women and clinics, this frustrating situation is heartbreaking.
The longer it takes a woman to secure funding, the more expensive the
procedure becomes and the fewer women we are able to help. The cost
of a procedure increases dramatically with each passing week, ranging
from a couple hundred dollars for an early, medical abortion to several
thousand dollars to terminate a pregnancy nearing the legal limit. After
twenty weeks, the cost of an abortion rises even more quickly: the difference
between a procedure done at 22 weeks versus 23 can be a thousand dollars.  

At NYAAF, our philosophy is simple. We aim
to pledge money to clinics as quickly as possible to ensure that women
are able to keep their earliest appointments and receive the safest
and most affordable care available. We maximize our funds by working
directly with clinics, negotiating discounts and payment plans for low-income
women and matching eligible women to public assistance. In the last
year, we helped 77 women pay for their abortions. Others we were able
to help apply for emergency Medicaid, assistance available in New York
but not all of our neighboring states. 

The economic downturn threatens
to wipe out our fund and pressures women all over the country to seek
later abortions. Communities need to invest in local grassroots abortion
funds like NYAAF and Americans nationwide need to pressure
the Obama administration to repeal the Hyde
Amendment
, which
prohibits federal funding for abortion. Those of us on the frontlines
of abortion funding can report: early funding makes all the difference.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with contact director of communications Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • progo35

    Planned parenthood states that viability occurs at 24 weeks. Shouldn’t this mean that 24 weeks is too late to have an abortion at all, barring some severe medical emergency?

    quot;Well behaved women seldom make history."-Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

  • invalid-0

    24 weeks is the legal limit, and also the procedure becomes even more expensive and dangerous after that point.

    Do notice the part where women want to have the procedure done earlier in their term, but can’t, because they haven’t collected enough funds to pay for it. Nobody’s running up to the limit just because they can.

  • progo35

    “Nobody’s running up to the limit just because they can.” Yes, I realize that. But if someone is that far along, like I’ve said before, abortion is taking the life of a developed fetus, not a clump of cells, and this seems to fly in the face of the claim that late term abortions are rare and done for catastrophic health reasons.

    "Well behaved women seldom make history."-Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

  • invalid-0

    and this seems to fly in the face of the claim that late term abortions are rare and done for catastrophic health reasons.

    Late-term abortions are as such when early-term abortions are not put out of reach by financial and other barriers. Are you going to tell me, with a straight face, that women postponing abortion due to anti-choice legislation and funding restrictions is an argument against the pro-choice side?

  • invalid-0

    –wait a second, how exactly does this fly in the face of the claim that late-term abortions are rare? Late-term abortions *are* rare. According to the most recent CDC report (from 2005), only 1.3 percent of all abortions performed in the U.S. are performed at over 21 weeks. And if I’m reading this Guttmacher publication correctly, an estimated .0008 percent of all abortions are performed at over 24 weeks.

  • invalid-0

    Thank God your abortion funds are drying up and babies’ lives will be spared.

    “Choose life so that you and your children may live.” Deut. 30:19

  • invalid-0

    …but because New York allows later-term abortions than its neighboring states, we see a disproportionate number of cases here. And because later cases are more expensive and women who have been forced to delay their abortion are often poorer women with the least access to medical care, these are some of the women most likely to look to the New York Abortion Access Fund for support.

    Based on the experiences of the women and clinic staff we talk to, it seems clear to us that increased funding for safe and early abortion services would reduce the number of later-term abortion cases in the United States. As the commenter above noted, few women want to delay having an abortion. Those who do face delays are often up against a number of odds, including a lack of funds.

    Leila Darabi

    Two things to note: First, the best way to reduce abortion is to reduce unintended pregnancy in the first place. Increased funding for abortion services should go hand and hand with increased public funding for the full range of prevention services including contraception and realistic sex education in schools.

    Second, it should be noted that NYAAF is the local chapter of the National Network of Abortion Funds (NNAF). For more information about how the national network helps women all over the country, the Web site is http://www.nnaf.org/

  • progo35

    But Leila-if abortion providers care so much about women, making abortion available, and reducing later abortions,why don’t they provide free early abortions to those women so that later ones don’t occur? Seriously, this would be the work of a true nonprofit, charity organization, would it not?

    "Well behaved women seldom make history."-Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

  • invalid-0

    But Leila-if abortion providers care so much about women, making abortion available, and reducing later abortions,why don’t they provide free early abortions to those women so that later ones don’t occur?

    Because “caring so much about women” doesn’t pay the rent. Now, if we were to repeal the Hyde Amendment, and federal funding entered the picture, then we would have a different story….

    Seriously, this would be the work of a true nonprofit, charity organization, would it not?

    That would be the work of an organization that can’t stay open past the end of the month. As great as free abortions would be, PP’s current funding structure doesn’t allow it.