Red States’ Porn Rates: You Were Surprised?


A
recent study that finds that states hospitable to disapproving anti-sex scolds
are the same states in which more online porn is consumed
is the sort of link bait that editors stay up nights dreaming about. 
People guffawing about conservative hypocrites, people defending conservative
hypocrites, and dudes who want to make it clear that every other dude
looks at as much porn as they do are all sure to weigh in on something
like that.  Echidne of the Snakes had my favorite response, wondering why the
study didn’t break down by gender

when every other variable came into play.  The enormous gender
gap in who gives money over to the porn industry (which is not the same
as who watches porn) is the sort of thing that’s sure to embarrass
the men of America, and so I see why it slid off the radar as a relevant
data point.  

One aspect of this study that’s getting obscured in much of the coverage is that they didn’t actually measure who consumes online porn at all.  If they did, they’d find a much higher average than some measly 5.42 out of 1000, which is the proportion of people in the conservative, religious state of Utah who subscribe to porn sites (the highest proportion of all states).  The study merely measured these subscribers, a much different and more dedicated group of porn users than the rest of Americans, who tend to pay to play on occasion or, most likely, just use the myriad of free porn sites to get a quick fix before moving onto other things.  

Presumably, the small percentage
of the population that gives over money to have a
steady, uninterrupted flow of mountains of pornographic videos are people
that aren’t getting their needs and desires met elsewhere on a regular
enough basis to compete with what porn offers.  Having seen, like pretty
much all Americans, plenty of porn in my time and, unlike many
Americans, having tried to analyze what it means in our culture for quite a
long time, I’ve concluded that porn basically appeals to a presumably
male audience (women watch porn, but most porn is not made with a female
audience in mind) for two reasons. There’s the plain old sexual fantasy
that appeals to 100% of porn users, and for a smaller but probably more
devoted group, there’s the appeal of seeing women degraded by sex
in order to make up for the indignity of having to treat women with
respect in real life.   

It’s human nature to respond
strongly to sexual fantasy, at least portrayals of our sexual fantasies,
and so that explains the appeal of porn to men, whether they’re misogynists
or not.  Silly but relatively harmless fantasies like insatiable
women and consensual voyeurism proliferate through porn in response
to this.  Unfortunately, there’s also a large and possibly growing
market of porn that’s main selling point is its vicious misogyny. 
Websites like the infamous Bang Bus make all their money by showing
men insulting, spitting upon, and having coerced sex with women, all
with a tone of revenge fantasy for some imagined slight delivered by
women in real life.  By no means do I think that this kind of stuff
appeals to all men, but there’s a misogynist audience out there who
happily will pay to see this sort of thing. 

Everyone giggles over the "hypocrisy"
of conservative porn use, but I fail to see how it’s really
that hypocritical.  The allergy towards sex that defines cultural
conservatism is more about judging women’s morality on what we do
with our genitals than any other factor, and a quick perusal of the horrific gender stereotyping in abstinence-only materials will prove
that in a minute.  Men, in this world view, are the ones who truly
want sex, and women are just softies who use sex to get to the romance.  Women who aggressively seek out sexual pleasure
for its own sake–a behavior designated as male-only–are sluts who
deserve to be used and tossed away by men for violating gender codes. 
In other words, the much-vaunted conservative morality is better known
as the "virgin/whore" dichotomy, where good girls you want to marry
don’t really like sex and bad girls you want to have sex with get
down and dirty and don’t deserve respect. 

This world view permeates both
purity balls and porn videos, especially the more misogynist ones that
I described.  If you’re a man who buys into the right
wing world view on gender, odds are you married a good girl and you know she’s a good girl because she’s a little hostile towards
sex, and really hostile towards sexual experimentation.  But you’re
a man, and you’re supposed to want those experimental behaviors.  You can’t do it with your good girl wife, and you don’t really
want to, either, because you know that women who do that don’t deserve
respect.  So there’s porn, mediating the conflict for you. 
You get your fun and freaky sex acts, like a man wants, and you have
porn actresses to disrespect so that you don’t have to put that on
your wife.  It’s the classic virgin/whore dichotomy, except done with a
credit card on the internet instead of down at the brothel with cash,
like in the past. 

Is it possible that a more
sexually liberated, feminist culture has less need for huge amounts
of porn, particularly of the sort that promotes objectionable views about women’s
humanity?  Seems like it.  Maybe there’s an inverse relationship
between the number of feminist sex shops in an area and the number of
subscriptions to porn websites.  It makes sense. The more sexually
liberated a culture is, the more the people in it are able to access sexual fantasies in diverse ways than
people in more repressed parts of the country.  And perhaps when
straight men aren’t crippled by virgin/whore complexes that cause
them to seek out some of the more hostile porn, they get to have more
sexual adventures for real, because they don’t give off the vibe to
partners that they’re going to call you names for experimenting with
them. 

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

Follow Amanda Marcotte on twitter: @amandamarcotte

  • invalid-0

    There is tremendous freedom in being married to a man who enjoys experimenting, but also respects when the wife becomes uncomfortable with that experiment… a little more “ok, let’s try something a little differently”.
    This allows the woman to act out fnatasies too, and to do them with someone she *should* feel safe with – her husband.
    If something suddenly feels freaky in a bad way, there is a respect. I know that when there is mutual understanding and respect, and the saint/whore thing is let go of, the relationship deepens,there’s more fun sexually, and the “need” for porn goes away or diminishes.
    Thank you for writing about this, and I completely agree that it is no wonder at all that the cultures that are outwardly sexually repressed are the ones who use internet porn the most, and, I would venture are more likely to have violent fantasies because it is UN Natural to repress sexual desires, frustration produces violence.

  • http://www.nazilieskill.us invalid-0

    The real problems with porn have to do with its sordid production and the enormous amount of time spent trying to masturbate. Like TV, it keeps people from talking, reading, writing and thinking. It keeps people from comparing notes.

  • invalid-0

    learn about methodology.

  • invalid-0

    “The real problems with porn have to do with its sordid production and the enormous amount of time spent trying to masturbate. Like TV, it keeps people from talking, reading, writing and thinking. It keeps people from comparing notes.”
    I would have to COMPLETELY and TOTALLY disagree! I’m female, I watch porn with and without my fiance, and yes I masturbate, as does he. I also talk a lot with a wide variety of people (not just gossip but actual intelligent conversations), I read on a daily basis (and not just the comics in a news paper!) and I have no problem thinking, especially for myself though your post sounds like it came straight from a church that TELLS you what you should be thinking.
    I don’t hide my sexuality, the fact that I watch porn or that I masturbate as I feel there is nothing there to hide, it is not some deep, dark, shameful secret to keep from the rest of the world. Mind you I don’t tell every person I pass on the street but if they were to ask I would answer honestly, as I said, I feel there is nothing to hide about my sexuality because it is part of me, part of who I am and part of what makes me, me.

  • invalid-0

    This from the same website where authors argue that abstience sex education “stereotypes” males for being visual? Honestly, would there be a porn industry if men weren’t visually aroused? Vasopressin (ADH), theorized to play a role in the formation of emmotionally charged (erotic) memories is released from a man’s posterior pituitary gland in response visual sexual stimulation. Most of the women I know don’t have a clue about how common porn viewing is among guys. Young boys become addicted to porn without knowing “why do I like this?” because they haven’t been taught their own physiology. Young girls drive them to seek release in porn because no one warned them that instead of looking cute and feminine in scant, provocative, uncomfortable, degrading clothing forces a young boy’s mind to fill in her complete surface anatomy so she’s as good as naked. Please choose to continue to truly educate young boys and girls about solid physiology, psychology and (I know this is a bad word these days) propriety.

  • invalid-0

    “Conservatives” constantly claim to be perfectly chaste, the “moral values” party, free of taint and label everybody else as immoral, godless degenerates while they themselves violate every principal they claim they’re fighting against and this is not hypocritical?

    If/when any “liberal” behaves this way, “conservatives” are the first to shout out at how it proves how morally bankrupt they are, but they don’t even raise an eyebrow when that person is “conservative”.

    Demonizing others for what oneself is guilty of is the literal definition of hypocrisy. “Conservatives” have made this a science and their main focus for at least 20 years.

  • invalid-0

    This article is simply one person’s opinion, unsupported by any factual evidence.

    For instance, the author mentions “…the infamous Bang Bus.” Um, I’ve never heard of it.

    She fails to mention any data supporting any of her theories. She states that “if you’re a man who buys into the right-wing world view of gender, adds are that you married a good girl…” without quoting any reference material, field studies, or even anecdotal evidence.

    Basically, this article is simply warmed-over Dworkinism. While the author has the right to espouse her views, I think that everyone who reads it should be aware that it is simply one person’s opinion, unsupported by any factual evidence.

  • http://www.redtube-cam.com/ invalid-0
  • http://www.pornaddict.fr/ invalid-0

    Porn is good for sexuality but not alone…