Instead of Inciting Blame, Young Father in Britain Should Remind Us Ab-Only Doesn’t Work


I
have always believed that sex is something deeply personal. As such,
it is up to an individual to decide what constitutes appropriate behavior
for him or herself. In other words, I know what is right for me, and
I would never use my personal standards to judge anyone else’s actions
(assuming, of course, that all parties involved are behaving legally).

That
said, every so often a story pops up that tests that belief. Most recently,
it is a sensational story out of Britain regarding a thirteen-year-old
father, Alfie (who was actually twelve when his new daughter was conceived).
Alfie’s girlfriend, the mother of baby Maisie, is only fifteen herself.

I
think about myself at thirteen compared to the person I have become
(I am now twenty-three) and the two are worlds apart. The last ten years
have been vital in developing me into the adult I have become. How would
my life be different had I been trying to raise a child while simultaneously
trying to grow up myself? Would I have had the same opportunities and
experiences? Personally, I do not want to have children and I am glad
that I have never had to ask myself those tough questions.

However,
this story is not about me or what I believe. It is about the fact that
a teenage boy in England whose voice hasn’t dropped yet, and who really
looks more like an eight-year-old, is now in charge of another person
and an entire country seems to be outraged about it. Furthermore, the
British can’t seem to decide where to point the finger of blame: the
parents? The school system? The Labour party?

In
my humble opinion, kids are going to do what they want, regardless of
what their parents or their government believe is right for them. If
there is a takeaway message that we should all learn from the last eight
years of abstinence-only education is that people – young and old – are
going to have sex whether we want them to or not. Rather than attempting
to regulate who can and cannot have sex, we should work on empowering
people to make the decisions that are right for them. In this case,
that means teaching students about sex, about contraception and relationships.
And we need to reach them while they’re still young.

Fortunately
for young people in Britain, these lessons are on the way. In October
of 2008, the British government, in an effort to reduce teen pregnancies,
has introduced a new curriculum of comprehensive sex and relationship
education that will be mandatory for all schools, public and private.
While this curriculum, known as the personal, social, and health education
(PSHE) will not be introduced until next year. You can read more about
Britain’s reforms in sexual education the US can look to for inspiration,
here
.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with Erin Wethern please contact Communications Director Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • invalid-0

    Without any moral standards, this is what you get. And where do you get moral standards, if, as you write “As such, it is up to an individual to decide what constitutes appropriate behavior for him or herself.”
    You further state that ‘legally’ is a criteria – I submit, where does the legal system come up with good morals?
    If you and your government throw the Bible out, this is what you get.

  • invalid-0

    Right, because laundries, scarlet letters, shotgun weddings, forced adoptions and back-alley abortions are not the products of religious dogma ruling law.

  • invalid-0

    Because it’s so “moral” to teach people to be ashamed of their bodies, to teach girls that their only worth resides in their hymens, to imprison and traumatize them if they “slip up” or get raped (while their impregnators get off scot-free).

    As for the Wholly Babble, it’s got some of the filthiest and *least*-moral stories imaginable. To take just one: Lot decided to protect his angel guests by giving his daughters to the mob to rape. Yep, that’s family values right there. Oh, but wait, they were just females, and therefore more or less livestock, right?

  • invalid-0

    …watched “Skins” on BBC America (ain’t cable grand?). The show depicts a cast of high school kids, whose main purpose in life seems to be various permutations of adolescent hedonism (“shagging” at the forefront) where the difference between them and adults are the adults can’t always shag who they want but given time, the kids can do almost anyone, including their teachers.
    What is surprising to me is the pregnancy reached term, as abortion services are much more plentiful and accessible, than in America. So, anyone who wants to preach morality better wake up, this 13-year-old being a dad is more the exception than the rule: the insemination by most 12-year-olds is terminated, with extreme prejudice.
    (BTW: one of the regulars on “Skins” is Dev Patel, whom you may know as the title character of the critically-acclaimed and award-winning movie “Slumdog Millionaire,” who is a Muslim in the series so conflicted with his religion, he drinks, has casual sex with a Russian teen on a field trip (maybe she’s an adult, they all look so young) and has a regular shagging partner in a girl his age(?) with the thickest cockney accent I’ve heard in ages. Patel told Jon Stewart he’s only 18 now, so these scenes in “Skins” might have been done when he was younger.)