Roundup: Pro-Choice Begich Wins Alaska Senate Seat; Tiller Trial Continues

Pro-choice Paul Begich wins Alaska Senate seat; will anti-choicers fighting Roe be marginalized?; Ross Douthat says anti-choicers should drop war on contraception; Dr. George Tiller's lawyers argue that charges should be dismissed.

Anti-Choice Sen. Ted Stevens Loses Seat
Anti-choice Alaska Senator Ted Stevens has lost his re-election race to Anchorage mayor Paul Begich, a pro-choice Democrat endorsed by NARAL Pro-Choice America. The Democrats are now two seats shy of a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.

Writes Politico,
"Begich defeated the Senate giant by a 3,724-vote margin after absentee
and early votes were counted, a stunning end to a 40-year Senate career
marred by Stevens’ conviction on corruption charges a week before the
election."

Anti-Choicers Fighting Roe Marginalized?
Reacting to yesterday’s Washington Post story on anti-choicers
switching gears to work on programs to support women bringing
pregnancies to term rather than overturning Roe, Catholic News Agency worried
about tactics employed to "marginalize both pro-lifers who favor
outlawing abortion and people who oppose homosexual politics."  The CNA
piece extensively covers the work of the Third Way Foundation, a
center-left think tank that has produced a memo suggesting politicians say,
"“Conservatives want to tear this country apart and throw people in
jail. I want to reduce the need for abortions by preventing unintended
pregnancies and supporting pregnant women.”

Ross Douthat Says Anti-Choice Movement Should Stop Waging War on Contraception
Conservative commentator Ross Douthat endorses a variety of abortion bans and limitations in a recent blog post at the Atlantic,
but says that the right-to-life movement should drop its fight against
contraception, acknowledging that the right to use contraception is
fundamental to the "post-Sexual Revolution human heart." 

 

I don’t find
the argument that either pill should be classified as an abortifacent
particularly convincing, and I don’t think the pro-life movement is
helping its cause by blurring the lines between actual abortifacents,
like RU-486, which are taken with the intent to abort an embryo, and
contraceptives that are designed to prevent conception, but may have
the secondary effect of preventing implantations on rare occasions. (At
the moment, moreover, the evidence that this ever actually happens is
relatively thin.) I think a pro-life movement that expends a great deal
of energy campaigning against the pill is essentially assuming the
permanence of Roe and Casey, and placing its hopes in a much broader
cultural transformation that seems extremely unlikely at the present
pass. It’s behaving like a Church, in a sense, rather than a political
movement, and I already have a Church: The point of the pro-life
movement, as I see it, is to seek discrete and plausible political
change, not to seek a revolution in the post-Sexual Revolution human
heart.


Tiller’s Lawyers Argue that Charges Should Be Dismissed
The trial against Dr. George Tiller, an abortion provider charged with
misdemeanors based on abortion care provided to women with fetuses
viable outside the womb, is underway in Wichita, Kansas.  Tiller’s
lawyers are trying to convince the judge to throw out the allegations
because the case is "based on evidence that Kline collected through
abuse of his authority as the state’s top law enforcement officer," writes Ron Sylvester in the Wichita Eagle
Kline gathered evidence by conducting an investigation to determine
whether abortion providers like Tiller were properly reporting sexual
abuse among teens.  He later announced that his definition of
indications of sexual abuse included any sex among underage patients,
including consensual sex among teens of similar ages. Writes Sylvester,
"The broad ruling so outraged health care providers and social workers
that a group sued Kline in federal court and won." (Sylvester is also Twittering the case.)