Culture of Lies: 2008 Politics


Editors Note: This is the first part of the four part Culture of Lies series; read the entire series here

Social conservatives cannot complain that their issues have not been heard in the 2008 campaign, in exactly the fashion they wanted.

John McCain selected the far-right’s hand-picked candidate as his running mate, Sarah Palin, instead of either of his preferred choices, Joe Lieberman or Tom Ridge. McCain used one of the far-right’s most egregious and most thoroughly debunked attacks, that Barack Obama supports infanticide, in the final presidential debate. The Republican Party platform is recognized as the most extreme platform in history on cultural issues. Palin has talked up "Culture of Life" issues in her very few interviews, and John McCain has as well, going on record saying he believes life begins at conception. The Republican National Committee, several pro-life lobbying groups, at least two independent expenditure campaigns and the McCain campaign have used television, radio, mail, internet and robo-calls to deliver what appears to be a coordinated message on the "Born Alive" infanticide charge.

The McCain-Palin campaign attacked comprehensive sexuality education, supported bans on gay marriage, and several fundamentalist Christian churches openly defied tax and election law by endorsing the ticket from their pulpits to further energize their base. Everyone is talking about the importance of the Supreme Court and attacks from the far-right have intensified as the campaign progressed.  In every possible way, the Republican Party and the McCain-Palin campaign embraced the far-right’s "Culture of Life."

Social conservatives could not possibly ask for more.

If McCain and Palin win, the appeal to the far-right base will be heralded as the reason, and he will owe them far more than just the Supreme Court justices he has promised.  If they lose, the recriminations, which have already started, will be fierce and the Culture War will likely turn into an un-Civil War within the Grand Old Party. Already the Palinistas on the far-right are suggesting she was "mishandled" by the campaign. Others will say with the economic crisis, there was just no way for McCain to win, even with a more experienced vice-president that appealed to independents.  

You can bet that none of the Culture Warriors on the far-right will take even one moment to consider that they have moved too far outside the mainstream of American culture. Either they are heroes for having delivered victory to McCain-Palin, or
if they lose, they’ll argue that McCain wasn’t strong enough on social
issues from the beginning. Will any brave and clear-sighted Republicans realize that rather than
throwing McCain a lifeline in this election, far-right extremism has
further isolated McCain, and the party, from mainstream Americans?

It is hard to imagine how much meaner and nastier a campaign can get than distorting someone’s record and accusing them of infanticide, but I have faith that the far-right could. That is what they will argue if they face defeat.

Yet there are actual facts that tell a different story from the one social-cons will believe, and argues against crediting them with victory should that come.

Since 2004, when equal numbers (37 percent) of Americans identified with each of the two major political parties, Democrats have held steady while the Republicans have dropped to 29 percent. New registrations, especially in swing states, have dramatically favored the Democrats. Across the board, polling has indicated that the Culture War issues of abortion and gay rights matter to a very small percentage of the electorate, usually less than five percent, often less than three.  Similarly, polling consistently indicates Americans reject far-right social conservative policies like abstinence-only-until-marriage, banning abortion and stem cell research, and discriminating against homosexuals.

VIDEO: Comprehensive Sex Ed vs. Abstinence-OnlyVIDEO: Comprehensive Sex Ed vs. Abstinence-Only
Barack Obama and Joe Biden have unflinchingly discussed their pro-education, pro-prevention and pro-choice values, from a position of public policy as well as personal morality. Obama put together a platform that has been praised by pro-choice and pro-life Democrats, and openly talks about working to reduce unintended pregnancies while respecting different opinions on abortion. The ticket supports stem cell research and does not believe in discrimination.

The far-right cannot complain that the Obama campaign has somehow "hidden" its agenda.

Could it be that Americans are rejecting the far-right Culture War? Could it be that they see through the tactical misinformation and manipulation of the "Culture of Life" and recognize it instead as a Culture of Lies? Even with a McCain victory the trend lines are obvious, the Culture War issues no longer resonate, especially with younger voters. 

Let’s be clear. I don’t know anyone who would take away the right for a person to believe what they choose, to follow their faith, however they interpret it.  The Culture of Lies is not about what the far-right believes or their right to believe it. The lies are about how they distort facts trying to impose what they believe on everyone else, taking away other Americans’ rights in the process.

If you want to believe dinosaurs and man walked the Earth together 6,000 years ago, when the Earth allegedly began, go right ahead — but let’s not teach that in public schools. If you hold, as a matter of faith, that pregnancy begins at an unknowable moment of conception, most people I know will fight for your right to believe that, but will oppose any effort to impose that ideology over basic medical facts in public policy. If you believe that teens really will remain abstinent and thus need no knowledge of prevention methods, that may work for you, but to continue wasting $1.5 billion dollars on programs that don’t achieve that goal, and actually put teens at risk, seems odd to many taxpayers. You believe that gay people "choose" to live a "lifestyle" that subjects them to discrimination, fine. You believe that women should not be allowed to make their own personal life decisions — that’s your choice — no one is forcing you to use contraception, plan your family, have an abortion, or work outside the home. And at death, should you suffer from a terminal illness and want every possible technology and treatment to keep you alive, no one — other than your insurance company — would deny you your belief that only God can end life, no matter how much science you use to keep yourself alive. The question on the table is whether your personal, individual beliefs should apply to everyone else, regardless of their personal, individual and deeply held beliefs.

For a generation, the far-right has promoted the biggest lie of all — that they are the ones fighting for individual rights, the ones whose values are threatened.

But the far-right has made a raison d’etre of opposing countless rights
critical to individuals’ freedom and self-determination, including stimatizing women who have abortions and making them more difficult to obtain; even banning procedures necessary to protect a women’s health — rather that work with common sense proposals like Prevention First promoted by progressives.

The far-right has attempted to equate contraception with abortion, which the Bush Administration will likely move toward by issuing a new ruling this week allowing trained medical professionals to deny you access to contraception. They demonized gay people and their families promoting ex-gay ministries instead of embracing God’s gay children and damned them by suggesting AIDS was God’s curse. The far-right continues to support policies that do more to promote the spread of AIDS than stop it, like increasing the abstinencce-only earmark in US global AIDS policy.

The far-right stood in the way of equal pay for women, denied family planning funding, imposed global gag rules denying free speech to doctors and medically accurate information to women, established Crisis Pregnancy Centers that promote propaganda over health, launched a war on science that delayed the approval of emergency contraception, spread misinformation about the efficacy of condoms, and so much more.

They have been unable to win these battles by arguing the truth as represented in medical facts, provable public health strategies, and science, so they lied. By manipulating genuine belief among people of faith with misinformation, they became a reliable power base within the Republican Party and as a result have had disproportionate influence on the political process, and the McCain-Palin campaign.

After eight years of being able to control the levers of power within the Bush Administration, the far-right was able to persuade John McCain to play his one shot at the White House their way. Having been beaten by their machine in 2000, he chose to follow instead of lead.

Americans have a full understanding of the Culture War the far-right has waged against their fellow Americans for a generation. We have seen their policies when they controlled Congress, we have watched the Bush Administration implement them, their judicial appointments put ideology over law, and the McCain-Palin team campaign on them.

Next week we will see if America embraces the values presented as a "Culture of Life" or sees them instead as a Culture of Lies.

Continue to Part 2, Culture of Lies: Values.

Like this story? Your $10 tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.

To schedule an interview with contact director of communications Rachel Perrone at rachel@rhrealitycheck.org.

  • http://palinhasproblems.blogspot.com/ invalid-0

    The nature and frequency of “The Odd Lies Of Sarah Palin” (at http://palinhasproblems.blogspot.com/2008/10/odd-lies-of-sarah-palin.html) suggest that she is a demagogue. “They are not the lies of a devious politician. They are much more troubling than that. They reflect a psyche unable to process fact when it conflicts with a delusional self-image. She is even worse in this psychotic denialism than Bush. She is a politician who can only survive in a propaganda state” (Sullivan, 19 Oct 2008 06:06 pm). That anyone still supports her shows the extent to which we have become an Orwellian propaganda state.

  • truth

    Sorry, I could only make it through Parts 1,2 and only a bit of 3 so far. Scott, you have a lot to say and seem to have some good core beliefs but where you stumble is that you are also supposed to be a witness and defender of your Faith. Not everyone is going to agree with you. Jesus knows that it cannot be this way (due to free will). Read your Bible, Scott. Jesus came here to Divide, "…son against father…" and so on. You are only looking at God’s forgiveness through Jesus Christ, but you have to remember that God is also All-Just. You cannot commit a sin against Him without Justice, and what comes with justice – that’s right, Punishment. But maybe even worse is a dull or eventually non-existent conscience. Look at the Homosexual community for example. It’s not enough for them to be treated like other hetero couples for social economic and tax purposes, etc… No, they want to change the word Marriage. They are asking to play on a different field – not a constitutional one but a spiritual one. Marriage is a union between one Man and one Woman sanctified by our Lord God – it has been understood this way for thousands of years. If this was simply about constitutional rights, etc, they wouldn’t care to play on the Spiritual plane – would they? This is just one example… The reason that we don’t want people commiting sins is because, Jesus teaches us to love our neighbor as ourselves. Would it be loving to stand by whilst your neighbor harms themself or others? You know the answer is an emphatic, "No!" What is the one institution on this planet that has stood the test of Modern Day Relativism? Lead your people to the Truth, Scott. Don’t be afraid to stand up for the innocent, the dignity of all human life and of course, basic common sense. Remember that the Devil works in very subtle ways so what seems to you like helping people and being "the nice guy" is really being a pushover and you are only helping the wrong side. The Kingdom of Heaven is unfortunately not all-inclusive rather, "…the path of righteousness is narrow…" However; "…the road to perdition is wide…" Don’t worry, Scott, you will find what you’re looking for if you seek with your Heart.

  • scott-swenson

    Truth:
    Thanks, but what I find true in my heart is what I follow, and I know the difference between good and evil. I do not need you to interpret politicized scripture or history for me, I have my own personal relationship with God. I appreciate that we disagree politically, that you refuse to see historically marriage included homosexual relationships in many cultures, including Christian, and that it has been about property, control, and discrimination for thousands of years. I’m happy to debate politics with you, but I’ve done and do my own spiritual work and research, as we all should, precisely because far too many people have chosen to politicize faith. People like you did it in the selection of scriptures to create and edit the Bible thousands of years ago, and in selective interpretation of scripture now. Please stop projecting your inner demons on others politically. Believe what you choose, but recognize that we are all part of God and deserve to live our lives, and make our decisions without your control, manipulation or dogma.


    Be the change you seek,

    Scott Swenson, Editor

  • invalid-0

    Amen Scott…I couldn’t have said it better myself.